RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    판례평석(判例評釋) : 거래대금의 사후감면과 법인세 과세- 대법원 2013. 12. 26. 선고, 2011두1245 판결을 중심으로 - = Modification of Sale Price and Corporate Tax- Focused on Supreme Court Decision 2011du1245

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101074692

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    It is very controversial, whether or not to approve taxpayer`s claim of reassessment by later occurring reasons(non-ordinary claim of reassessment) of Frame Work Act on National Tax. In connection with this issues, the supreme court made a very important decision in December, 2013. In this case(supreme court case, 2011du1245) it was disputed that a later reduction of sale price could be also a legitimate reason of non-ordinary claim of reassessment according to the article 45-2, paragraph 2 in Frame Work Act on National Tax. Taxpayer, who is subject to the corporate tax, signed a real estate sale contract for 110 billion won in 2004. In 2005, next tax year of 2004, the company modified the contract by mutual consents between contract partners and reduced the sale price from 110 billion won to 103 billion won. The amount of price reduction was 7 billion won. The company insisted that 7 billion won should be deducted from the profits of 2004. The supreme court accepted that argument. The court decided that the reduction of sale price in 2005 was also a legitimate reason of non-ordinary claim of reassessment. However this decision from the supreme court was not reasonable. In this article we insist that the amount of sale price reduction, 7 billion won, shoud be deducted from not the profits in 2004, but in 2005.
    번역하기

    It is very controversial, whether or not to approve taxpayer`s claim of reassessment by later occurring reasons(non-ordinary claim of reassessment) of Frame Work Act on National Tax. In connection with this issues, the supreme court made a very import...

    It is very controversial, whether or not to approve taxpayer`s claim of reassessment by later occurring reasons(non-ordinary claim of reassessment) of Frame Work Act on National Tax. In connection with this issues, the supreme court made a very important decision in December, 2013. In this case(supreme court case, 2011du1245) it was disputed that a later reduction of sale price could be also a legitimate reason of non-ordinary claim of reassessment according to the article 45-2, paragraph 2 in Frame Work Act on National Tax. Taxpayer, who is subject to the corporate tax, signed a real estate sale contract for 110 billion won in 2004. In 2005, next tax year of 2004, the company modified the contract by mutual consents between contract partners and reduced the sale price from 110 billion won to 103 billion won. The amount of price reduction was 7 billion won. The company insisted that 7 billion won should be deducted from the profits of 2004. The supreme court accepted that argument. The court decided that the reduction of sale price in 2005 was also a legitimate reason of non-ordinary claim of reassessment. However this decision from the supreme court was not reasonable. In this article we insist that the amount of sale price reduction, 7 billion won, shoud be deducted from not the profits in 2004, but in 2005.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼