RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    교실응답시스템(Classroom Response System; CRS) 활용에 대한 인식과 학업성취도에 관한 연구 = Perception and Effects of Classroom Response System Use

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959537

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examined the college students’ perceptions of Classroom Response System(CRS) and its effects on their academic achievement. Participants were divided into an experimental group and a control group. Participants were given a review quiz with five to seven questions at the end of each class for one semester. Participants in the experimental group were asked to answer the questions using CRS while their counterpartners in the control group were to answer by raising their hands. The results of the study indicated that participants in the experimental group rated their of level of satisfaction and participation higher than the participants in the control group did. There was statistically significant difference in their academic achievement between the two groups when their final exam scores were compared. Particularly a percentage of correct answers for some review questions presented during the classes were significantly higher in the experimental group. This study empirically proved the effect of CRS use in academic achievement. Based on the findings, directions for future research are suggested.
    번역하기

    This study examined the college students’ perceptions of Classroom Response System(CRS) and its effects on their academic achievement. Participants were divided into an experimental group and a control group. Participants were given a review quiz wi...

    This study examined the college students’ perceptions of Classroom Response System(CRS) and its effects on their academic achievement. Participants were divided into an experimental group and a control group. Participants were given a review quiz with five to seven questions at the end of each class for one semester. Participants in the experimental group were asked to answer the questions using CRS while their counterpartners in the control group were to answer by raising their hands. The results of the study indicated that participants in the experimental group rated their of level of satisfaction and participation higher than the participants in the control group did. There was statistically significant difference in their academic achievement between the two groups when their final exam scores were compared. Particularly a percentage of correct answers for some review questions presented during the classes were significantly higher in the experimental group. This study empirically proved the effect of CRS use in academic achievement. Based on the findings, directions for future research are suggested.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 민혜리, "학생들이 인식하는 좋은 강의의 특성 연구 : 국내 대학과 해외 대학의 강의 체험 분석을 중심으로" 한국열린교육학회 19 (19): 57-88, 2011

    2 이은화(李恩花), "좋은 대학수업의 특징과 그 의미: 한국 대학생의 관점에서" 한국교육사상연구회 22 (22): 123-146, 2008

    3 박민정, "대학에서의 좋은 수업에 대한 학생의 인식 ―다시 듣고 싶은 수업 에세이 분석―" 인문과학연구소 35 (35): 229-253, 2008

    4 정은이, "대학에서의 좋은 수업에 대한 교수자와 학습자의 인식" 한국교육방법학회 22 (22): 25-44, 2010

    5 김재건, "대학생들의 의견 조사를 통한 대학 수업 개선 영역 고찰" 한국교육학회 46 (46): 121-150, 2008

    6 윤소정, "다면적 접근을 통한 대학의 좋은 수업 특성 분석" 한국수산해양교육학회 24 (24): 963-976, 2012

    7 Strasser, N., "Who Wants to Pass Math? Using Clickers in Calculus" 7 (7): 49-52, 2010

    8 Guthrie, R. W., "Waking the dead: Using interactive technology to engage passive listeners in the classroom" 2004

    9 Parette, H. P., "Using"Clicker 5"to Enhance Emergent Literacy in Young Learners" 36 (36): 355-363, 2009

    10 Addison, S., "Using clickers to improve student engagement and performance in an introductory biochemistry class" 37 (37): 84-91, 2009

    1 민혜리, "학생들이 인식하는 좋은 강의의 특성 연구 : 국내 대학과 해외 대학의 강의 체험 분석을 중심으로" 한국열린교육학회 19 (19): 57-88, 2011

    2 이은화(李恩花), "좋은 대학수업의 특징과 그 의미: 한국 대학생의 관점에서" 한국교육사상연구회 22 (22): 123-146, 2008

    3 박민정, "대학에서의 좋은 수업에 대한 학생의 인식 ―다시 듣고 싶은 수업 에세이 분석―" 인문과학연구소 35 (35): 229-253, 2008

    4 정은이, "대학에서의 좋은 수업에 대한 교수자와 학습자의 인식" 한국교육방법학회 22 (22): 25-44, 2010

    5 김재건, "대학생들의 의견 조사를 통한 대학 수업 개선 영역 고찰" 한국교육학회 46 (46): 121-150, 2008

    6 윤소정, "다면적 접근을 통한 대학의 좋은 수업 특성 분석" 한국수산해양교육학회 24 (24): 963-976, 2012

    7 Strasser, N., "Who Wants to Pass Math? Using Clickers in Calculus" 7 (7): 49-52, 2010

    8 Guthrie, R. W., "Waking the dead: Using interactive technology to engage passive listeners in the classroom" 2004

    9 Parette, H. P., "Using"Clicker 5"to Enhance Emergent Literacy in Young Learners" 36 (36): 355-363, 2009

    10 Addison, S., "Using clickers to improve student engagement and performance in an introductory biochemistry class" 37 (37): 84-91, 2009

    11 King, D. B., "Using clickers to identify the muddiest points in large chemistry classes" 88 (88): 1485-1488, 2011

    12 Elliott, C., "Using a personal response system in economics teaching" 1 (1): 80-86, 2003

    13 Wait, R. K., "Use of an audience response system during peer teaching among physical therapy students in human gross anatomy : Perceptions of peer teachers and students" 2 (2): 286-293, 2009

    14 Ghosh, S., "Technology in support of good pedagogy: Electronic response systems and peer instruction in an economics classroom"

    15 Wolter, B. H. K., "Students’ Perceptions of Using Personal Response Systems("Clickers")with Cases in Science" 40 (40): 14-19, 2011

    16 Fifer, P., "Student perception of clicker usage in nursing education" 7 (7): 6-9, 2012

    17 Gauci, S. A., "Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system" 33 (33): 60-71, 2009

    18 Sprague, E. W., "Learning to Click : An Evaluation of the Personal Response System Clicker Technology in Introductory Marketing Courses" 32 (32): 93-103, 2010

    19 Judson, E., "Learning from past and present : Electronic response systems in college lecture halls" 21 (21): 167-181, 2002

    20 Solecki, S., "Integrating clicker technology at nursing conferences : An innovative approach to research data collection" 16 (16): 268-273, 2010

    21 Walgren, J., "Innovative Use of a Classroom Response System during Physics Lab" 49 (49): 30-32, 2011

    22 Draper, S. W., "Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system" 20 : 81-94, 2004

    23 Zimitat, C., "First year students’ perceptions of the importance of good teaching : Not all things are equal" 29 : 386-392, 2006

    24 MacArthur, J. L., "Faculty viewpoints on teaching large-enrollment science courses with clickers" 30 (30): 251-270, 2011

    25 Milner-Bolotin, M., "Facilitating engagement of pre-service elementary teachers with technology: Design and evaluation of effective multiple-choice science questions" 2011

    26 Bartsch, R. A., "Examining the effects of an electronic classroom response system on student engagement and performance" 44 (44): 25-33, 2011

    27 Shaffer, D. M., "Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Personal Response System in the Classroom" 36 (36): 273-277, 2009

    28 Hunter-Revell, S. M., "Engaging millennial learners : Effectiveness of personal response system technology with nursing students in small and large classrooms" 49 : 272-275, 2010

    29 Morling, B., "Efficacy of Personal Response Systems("Clickers")in Large, Introductory Psychology Classes" 35 (35): 45-50, 2008

    30 Karaman, S., "Effects of audience response systems on student achievement and long-term retention" 39 (39): 1431-1440, 2011

    31 Doucet, M., "Effect of using an audience response system on learning environment, motivation and long-term retention, during case-discussions in a large group of undergraduate veterinary clinical pharmacology students" 31 (31): 570-579, 2009

    32 FitzPatrick, K. A., "Effect of personal response systems on student perception and academic performance in courses in a health sciences curriculum" 35 (35): 280-289, 2011

    33 Lee, J. B., "Do clickers depersonalize the classroom? An evaluation by shy students" 2006

    34 Flynn, A. B., "Developing problem-solving skills through retrosynthetic analysis and clickers in organic chemistry" 88 (88): 1496-1500, 2011

    35 Towns, M. H., "Crossing the Chasm with Classroom Response Systems" 87 (87): 1317-1319, 2010

    36 Cooper, M., "Cooperative learning: An approach for large enrollment courses" 72 (72): 162-164, 1995

    37 Lundeberg, M. A., "Context matters : Increasing understanding with interactive clicker case studies" 59 (59): 645-671, 2011

    38 Anderson, L. S., "Conserving time in the classroom : The clicker technique" 64 (64): 1457-1462, 2011

    39 Smith, M. K., "Combining Peer Discussion with Instructor Explanation Increases Student Learning from In-Class Concept Questions" 10 (10): 55-63, 2011

    40 De Gagne, J., "Clicker를 활용한 건강교육관련 문헌 고찰" 15 : 9-17, 2011

    41 Caldwell, J. E., "Clickers in the large classroom : Current research and best-practice tips" 6 : 9-20, 2007

    42 Cheeseman, E. A., "Clickers in teacher education : Student perceptions by age and gender" 18 (18): 35-55, 2010

    43 Mayer, R. E., "Clickers in college classrooms : Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes" 34 (34): 51-57, 2009

    44 Beckert, T. E., "Clicker satisfaction for students in human development : differences for class type, prior exposure, and student talkativity" 11 (11): 599-612, 2009

    45 Salemi, M. K., "Clickenomics : Using a Classroom Response System to Increase Student Engagement in a Large-Enrollment Principles of Economics Course" 40 (40): 385-404, 2009

    46 Langman, J., "Classroom response system-mediated science learning with English language learners" 24 (24): 81-99, 2010

    47 Maikunis, G., "Changing the nature of lectures using a personal response system" 46 (46): 199-212, 2009

    48 Eastman, J. K., "Business students’ perceptions, attitudes, and satisfaction with interactive technology : An exploratory study" 86 (86): 36-43, 2011

    49 Banks, D. A., "Audience response systems in higher education: Applications and cases" Information Science Publishing 2006

    50 Donovan, W., "An electronic response system and conceptests in general chemistry courses" 27 (27): 369-389, 2008

    51 Bachman, L., "A study of classroom response system clickers : Increasing student engagement and performance in a large undergraduate lecture class on architectural research" 22 (22): 5-21, 2011

    52 Cain, J., "A primer on audience response systems : Current applications and future considerations" 72 (72): 1-6, 2008

    53 Ramsden, P., "A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education : The course experience questionnaire" 16 (16): 129-150, 1991

    54 Ruder, S. M., "A Method for Writing Open-Ended Curved Arrow Notation Questions for Multiple-Choice Exams and Electronic-Response Systems" 86 (86): 1392-1396, 2009

    55 Weerts, S. E., ""Clicker"technology promotes interactivity in an undergraduate nutrition course" 41 (41): 227-228, 2009

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 3.7 3.7 3.26
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.89 2.68 3.751 0.75
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼