RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    북핵 협상 20년 = 연구 쟁점과 과제

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82731473

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The current state of affairs involves a continuing conflict between efforts by the international community to solve the North Korean nuclear issue and North Korea’s refusal to comply and an increasingly pessimistic view towards the prospect of denuclearizing North Korea since the 2nd nuclear test. Looking back on the North Korean nuclear negotiations for the past 20 years, I believe that it is time we reexamine as to whether there is any fundamental limitations in the approach taken to solve the problem.
    This study does not try to analyze the major nuclear negotiation related issues raised till now simply through chronological or as a conflict between concerned parties. Rather, the paper attempts to approach the problem from the perspective of negotiation studies by examining the main factors of negotiation structure analysis such as points of dispute in the negotiation structure, strategy and results.
    Based on the research materials such as theses, government reports and published journals, this study attempts to examine individual scholar’s method of approach and the main issues regarding the North Korean nuclear issue. When there is a specific pattern in their research disposition, it is the aim of this paper to discover the usefulness of such a trend from the perspective of negotiation studies.
    It is my belief that examining how South Korean scholars have dealt with North Korean nuclear issue from a theoretical or policy related perspective can offer as important a policy suggestion as that derived from government efforts.
    번역하기

    The current state of affairs involves a continuing conflict between efforts by the international community to solve the North Korean nuclear issue and North Korea’s refusal to comply and an increasingly pessimistic view towards the prospect of denuc...

    The current state of affairs involves a continuing conflict between efforts by the international community to solve the North Korean nuclear issue and North Korea’s refusal to comply and an increasingly pessimistic view towards the prospect of denuclearizing North Korea since the 2nd nuclear test. Looking back on the North Korean nuclear negotiations for the past 20 years, I believe that it is time we reexamine as to whether there is any fundamental limitations in the approach taken to solve the problem.
    This study does not try to analyze the major nuclear negotiation related issues raised till now simply through chronological or as a conflict between concerned parties. Rather, the paper attempts to approach the problem from the perspective of negotiation studies by examining the main factors of negotiation structure analysis such as points of dispute in the negotiation structure, strategy and results.
    Based on the research materials such as theses, government reports and published journals, this study attempts to examine individual scholar’s method of approach and the main issues regarding the North Korean nuclear issue. When there is a specific pattern in their research disposition, it is the aim of this paper to discover the usefulness of such a trend from the perspective of negotiation studies.
    It is my belief that examining how South Korean scholars have dealt with North Korean nuclear issue from a theoretical or policy related perspective can offer as important a policy suggestion as that derived from government efforts.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 통일연구원, "한반도평화체제: 자료와 해제" 통일연구원 2007

    2 안대균, "약소국의 대강대국 협상: 특징과 과제" 한국협상학회 5 (5): 1999

    3 안대균, "북핵문제 구조와 과제" 2010

    4 조민, "북핵 일괄타결 방안:의의 및 추진방향, in 북핵 일괄타결 방안 추진 방안" 통일연구원 2009

    5 전성훈, "북한 핵보유 의지 확인과 대외 협상 및 위협용" 북한연구소 2009

    6 외교부, "북한 핵문제 자료집" 외교부 2011

    7 외교부, "북한 핵문제 분석자료집" 외교부 2005

    8 통일연구원, "남북관계연표 1948~2009" 통일연구원 2009

    9 Underdal, Arild, "The outcomes of Negotiation, in International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues" Jossey-Bass Company 2002

    10 Kleiboer, Marieke, "The multiple realities of International Mediation" Lynne Rienner Publishers 1999

    1 통일연구원, "한반도평화체제: 자료와 해제" 통일연구원 2007

    2 안대균, "약소국의 대강대국 협상: 특징과 과제" 한국협상학회 5 (5): 1999

    3 안대균, "북핵문제 구조와 과제" 2010

    4 조민, "북핵 일괄타결 방안:의의 및 추진방향, in 북핵 일괄타결 방안 추진 방안" 통일연구원 2009

    5 전성훈, "북한 핵보유 의지 확인과 대외 협상 및 위협용" 북한연구소 2009

    6 외교부, "북한 핵문제 자료집" 외교부 2011

    7 외교부, "북한 핵문제 분석자료집" 외교부 2005

    8 통일연구원, "남북관계연표 1948~2009" 통일연구원 2009

    9 Underdal, Arild, "The outcomes of Negotiation, in International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues" Jossey-Bass Company 2002

    10 Kleiboer, Marieke, "The multiple realities of International Mediation" Lynne Rienner Publishers 1999

    11 Zartman, I. William, "The Structure of Negotiation, in International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues" Jossey-Bass Company 2002

    12 Axelrod, Robert, "The Evolution of Cooperation" Basic Books 1984

    13 Zartman, I. William, "The Elephant and the Holograph: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis and Paradigm, in International Multilateral Negotiation" Jossey-Bass Company 2000

    14 Bolton, John R., "The Bush Adminstration’s Nonproliferation Policy: Successes and Future Challenges"

    15 Pruitt, Dean G., "Strategy in Negotiation, in International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues" Jossey-Bass Company 2002

    16 Niksch, Larry A., "North Korea’s Neclear Weapons Development and Diplomacy" CRS 2009

    17 Thompson, Alexander, "Multi-Lateralisms; Explaining Variations in Regime Instruments" 2008

    18 Rubin, Jeffrey Z., "International Negotiation" Jossey-Bass 1994

    19 Berton, Peter, "International Negotiation" Macmillan Press 1999

    20 Merrillls, J. G., "International Dispute Settlement" Cambridge University Press 2005

    21 Petsch, Frank, "Institution Matter: the European Union, in International Negotiation" Macmillan Press 2000

    22 Blum, Gabriel, "Bilateralism, Multi-lateralism, and the Architecture of International Law" 49 (49): 2008

    23 전봉근, "2차 북핵실험이후 6자회담과 비핵화 전략" 2009

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2018-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-03-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of International Studies -> Korean Journal of International Relations KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-12-01 등재 학술지 분리 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2010-06-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of International Relations -> The Korean Journal of International Studies KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.91 0.91 1.12
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.07 1.09 1.415 0.17
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼