RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    자료공개와 법제도적 개선을 통한 범죄통계 활용 활성화 방안 = Activating the Use of Crime Statistics Through Open Data Policy and Improvement Devices on the Law and Institution

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100095356

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    A paradigm change of opening government data demands a change in policies regarding crime statistics. The Open Government initiative in the US and the UK as well as the Government 3.0 plan in Korea pursue generating vitality and creativity in the private sector and solving a variety of social problems through opening government data on a large scale. Accordingly, the police in the US and the UK have increased the amount of raw data on crime provided to the public coupled with online crime maps. In contrast, the Korean police have maintained a negative policy toward providing raw data on crime. Justifying their policy on crime data, the Korean police rely on legal grounds such as the Freedom of Information Act and the Criminal Procedure Electronic Promoting Act. In addition, more important reasons to restrict opening data include concern for an invasion of privacy, regional stigmatization, reduction of property value, misuse of crime data, and disclosure of data problems. However, most of the reasons suggested by the police lacks validity as reasonable grounds for limiting public access to crime data. Rather providing crime data to the public is more likely to reduce groundless fear of crime, improve public confidence in police, support empowerment of citizens, promote transparency of government, and result in advancement of research. This study suggests several strategic approaches to expand a public access to crime data focusing on three aspects such as crime analysis outcomes, crime mapping, and raw data. In regard to who and how raw data on crime should be provided, we suggested three approaches: positive, negative, neutral one. Initially, raw data on crime need to be provided only to scholars who are qualified through a strict data request process and later they may be open to the general public. Finally, a law should be enacted to clarify the police``s duty to collect crime data by and a special agency exclusively charged for managing and distributing crime data need to be established.
    번역하기

    A paradigm change of opening government data demands a change in policies regarding crime statistics. The Open Government initiative in the US and the UK as well as the Government 3.0 plan in Korea pursue generating vitality and creativity in the priv...

    A paradigm change of opening government data demands a change in policies regarding crime statistics. The Open Government initiative in the US and the UK as well as the Government 3.0 plan in Korea pursue generating vitality and creativity in the private sector and solving a variety of social problems through opening government data on a large scale. Accordingly, the police in the US and the UK have increased the amount of raw data on crime provided to the public coupled with online crime maps. In contrast, the Korean police have maintained a negative policy toward providing raw data on crime. Justifying their policy on crime data, the Korean police rely on legal grounds such as the Freedom of Information Act and the Criminal Procedure Electronic Promoting Act. In addition, more important reasons to restrict opening data include concern for an invasion of privacy, regional stigmatization, reduction of property value, misuse of crime data, and disclosure of data problems. However, most of the reasons suggested by the police lacks validity as reasonable grounds for limiting public access to crime data. Rather providing crime data to the public is more likely to reduce groundless fear of crime, improve public confidence in police, support empowerment of citizens, promote transparency of government, and result in advancement of research. This study suggests several strategic approaches to expand a public access to crime data focusing on three aspects such as crime analysis outcomes, crime mapping, and raw data. In regard to who and how raw data on crime should be provided, we suggested three approaches: positive, negative, neutral one. Initially, raw data on crime need to be provided only to scholars who are qualified through a strict data request process and later they may be open to the general public. Finally, a law should be enacted to clarify the police``s duty to collect crime data by and a special agency exclusively charged for managing and distributing crime data need to be established.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼