RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    금융규제체계개편론 -은행의 업무범위에 대한 국제적 논의를 중심으로- = Financial Reform and the Banking Business Regulation

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82770048

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    It is a topic of hot debate how to regulate the permissible activities of banks after the global financial crisis. The US introduced the Volcker Rule strictly restricting the proprietary trading and private funds-related business of commercial banks. The UK Vickers Commission recommended the structural separation, or ring-fencing, of retail banking business from wholesale/investment banking business. This Article explores those issues from the standpoint of the specialty of banking business, the regulation of shadow banking, and the role of banks in developing capital markets in Korea. In spite of their negative impacts on real economy through excessive size and risk-taking, banks` functions such as deposit-taking, payment settlement business and credit extension to individuals and SMEs are positive and essential for our economic life. The answer is simple and clear. We must find the structure to prevent banks` excessive size and risk-taking from hindering positive and essential banking functions. This Article proposes a UK-style ring-fencing of retail banking from wholesale/investment banking as a way to reconcile the special roles of banking business with the purpose of controlling risks inherent in banks. We should reconsider the scope of permissible activities of financial investment firms in that they can do payment settlement business in its broad sense.
    번역하기

    It is a topic of hot debate how to regulate the permissible activities of banks after the global financial crisis. The US introduced the Volcker Rule strictly restricting the proprietary trading and private funds-related business of commercial banks. ...

    It is a topic of hot debate how to regulate the permissible activities of banks after the global financial crisis. The US introduced the Volcker Rule strictly restricting the proprietary trading and private funds-related business of commercial banks. The UK Vickers Commission recommended the structural separation, or ring-fencing, of retail banking business from wholesale/investment banking business. This Article explores those issues from the standpoint of the specialty of banking business, the regulation of shadow banking, and the role of banks in developing capital markets in Korea. In spite of their negative impacts on real economy through excessive size and risk-taking, banks` functions such as deposit-taking, payment settlement business and credit extension to individuals and SMEs are positive and essential for our economic life. The answer is simple and clear. We must find the structure to prevent banks` excessive size and risk-taking from hindering positive and essential banking functions. This Article proposes a UK-style ring-fencing of retail banking from wholesale/investment banking as a way to reconcile the special roles of banking business with the purpose of controlling risks inherent in banks. We should reconsider the scope of permissible activities of financial investment firms in that they can do payment settlement business in its broad sense.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼