RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    접촉 가설에 근거한 반편견 교수 방법 = Teaching Methods for Anti-Bias Education based on Contact Hypothesis

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102737438

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Psychologists have long been understood that properly structured intergroup contact offers substantial potential for ameliorating intergroup tension, promoting prejudice reduction, and improving intergroup relation. Contact hypothesis is one of the most extensively researched framework for reducing intergroup prejudice. But it has gained little attention from domestic researchers. The purpose of this paper was to delve into the implications of contact hypothesis to teaching methodologies in moral education. According to the results of contact theories, intergroup contact is helpful for improving intergroup relations and reducing bias and conflicts. The empirical focus of the early works on contact hypothesis was specifically on the direct, personal experience of intergroup contact. But, as the end of the 20th century approached, a new perspective was introduced. Recently, many researchers on contact hypothesis have emphasized the importance of indirect contact. Indirect contact includes a range of different types of activities. It involves an extended contact, a parasocial contact, a vicarious contact, and an imagined contact. Based on a careful analysis of literature on contact hypothesis, I proposed the five teaching methods for anti-bias education. Utilizing cooperative learning, Using a cultural assimilator, providing students with opportunities for vicarious contact, providing multicultural service learning, and teaching various social skills required for the future contact.
    번역하기

    Psychologists have long been understood that properly structured intergroup contact offers substantial potential for ameliorating intergroup tension, promoting prejudice reduction, and improving intergroup relation. Contact hypothesis is one of the mo...

    Psychologists have long been understood that properly structured intergroup contact offers substantial potential for ameliorating intergroup tension, promoting prejudice reduction, and improving intergroup relation. Contact hypothesis is one of the most extensively researched framework for reducing intergroup prejudice. But it has gained little attention from domestic researchers. The purpose of this paper was to delve into the implications of contact hypothesis to teaching methodologies in moral education. According to the results of contact theories, intergroup contact is helpful for improving intergroup relations and reducing bias and conflicts. The empirical focus of the early works on contact hypothesis was specifically on the direct, personal experience of intergroup contact. But, as the end of the 20th century approached, a new perspective was introduced. Recently, many researchers on contact hypothesis have emphasized the importance of indirect contact. Indirect contact includes a range of different types of activities. It involves an extended contact, a parasocial contact, a vicarious contact, and an imagined contact. Based on a careful analysis of literature on contact hypothesis, I proposed the five teaching methods for anti-bias education. Utilizing cooperative learning, Using a cultural assimilator, providing students with opportunities for vicarious contact, providing multicultural service learning, and teaching various social skills required for the future contact.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 송선영, "한국 다문화 사회의 도덕적 공황 상태에 대한 연구" 한국윤리학회 1 (1): 73-112, 2010

    2 조영달, "학교 다문화교육의 실태 분석" 한국사회과교육학회 42 (42): 151-184, 2010

    3 추병완, "도덕교육의 이해" 백의 2004

    4 교육인적자원부, "도덕과 교육과정" 교육인적자원부 2007

    5 추병완, "다문화교육의 관점에서 도덕과 교육과정의 개정 방향" 한국윤리학회 1 (1): 79-104, 2011

    6 정진경, "남북한 간 문화이해지의 제작" 통일연구원 2 (2): 1998

    7 Mazziotta, A, "Vicarious intergroup contact effects: Applying social-cognitive theory to intergroup contact research" 14 : 255-274, 2011

    8 Johnson, D. W, "The three Cs of reducing prejudice and discrimination, In Reducing prejudice and discrimination" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers 2000

    9 Allport, G. W, "The nature of prejudice, 25th anniversary ed" Addison-Wesley 1979

    10 Wright, S. C, "The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice" 73 : 73-90, 1997

    1 송선영, "한국 다문화 사회의 도덕적 공황 상태에 대한 연구" 한국윤리학회 1 (1): 73-112, 2010

    2 조영달, "학교 다문화교육의 실태 분석" 한국사회과교육학회 42 (42): 151-184, 2010

    3 추병완, "도덕교육의 이해" 백의 2004

    4 교육인적자원부, "도덕과 교육과정" 교육인적자원부 2007

    5 추병완, "다문화교육의 관점에서 도덕과 교육과정의 개정 방향" 한국윤리학회 1 (1): 79-104, 2011

    6 정진경, "남북한 간 문화이해지의 제작" 통일연구원 2 (2): 1998

    7 Mazziotta, A, "Vicarious intergroup contact effects: Applying social-cognitive theory to intergroup contact research" 14 : 255-274, 2011

    8 Johnson, D. W, "The three Cs of reducing prejudice and discrimination, In Reducing prejudice and discrimination" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers 2000

    9 Allport, G. W, "The nature of prejudice, 25th anniversary ed" Addison-Wesley 1979

    10 Wright, S. C, "The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice" 73 : 73-90, 1997

    11 Fiedler, F. E, "The culture assimilator: An approach to cross-cultural training" 95-102, 1971

    12 Schiappa, E, "The Parasocial Contact Hypothesis" 72 : 92-115, 2005

    13 Hoopes, D. S, "Teaching strategies: The methods and techniques of cross-cultural training, In Multicultural education: A cross-cultural training approach" Intercultural Press 1984

    14 Cushner, K. H, "Teaching cross-cultural psychology: Providing the missing link" 14 (14): 220-223, 1987

    15 Stephan, W, "Reducing prejudice and stereotyping in schools" Teachers College Press 1999

    16 Vrij, A, "Reducing ethnic prejudice: An evaluation of seven recommended principles for incorporation in public campaigns" 13 : 284-299, 2003

    17 Brown, R, "Prejudice: Its social psychology" Blackwell 2000

    18 Boyle-Baise, M, "Multicultural service learning" Teachers College Press 2002

    19 Johnson, D W, "Multicultural education and human relations" Allyn and Bacon 2001

    20 Pettigrew, T. F, "Intergroup contact theory" 49 : 65-85, 1999

    21 O'Grady, C, "Integrating service learning and multicultural education: An overview, In Integrating service learning and multicultural education in colleges and universities" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers 2000

    22 Dovidio, J. F, "Improving intergroup relations through direct, extended and other forms of indirect contact" 14 : 147-160, 2011

    23 Pettigrew, T. F, "How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators" 38 : 922-934, 2008

    24 Levy, S. R, "Development of racial and ethnic prejudice among children, In Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination" Psychology Press 2009

    25 Seaman, J, "Contact theory as a framework for experiential activities as diversity education: An exploratory study" 32 (32): 207-225, 2009

    26 Erasmus, Z, "Contact Theory: Too Timid for Race and Racism" 66 (66): 387-400, 2010

    27 Crisp, R. J, "Can imagined inter¬actions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact" 64 (64): 231-240, 2009

    28 Dixon, J, "Beyond the optimal contact strategy: A reality check for the contact hypothesis" 60 : 697-711, 2005

    29 Derman-Sparks, L, "Anti-bias curriculum: Tools for empowering young children" National Association for the Education of Young Children 1989

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2014-02-24 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Ethics Studies Association -> The Korean Association of Ethics KCI등재
    2014-02-24 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Korean Ethics Studies -> Journal of Ethics KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-12-20 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국국민윤리학회 -> 한국윤리학회 KCI등재
    2006-12-20 학술지명변경 한글명 : 국민윤리연구 -> 윤리연구
    외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Korean Ethics Studies
    KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.43 0.43 0.42
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.41 0.4 0.578 0.08
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼