국어 항진명제의 통사유형과 의미 = A Study on the Syntactic Patterns and Meanings of Korean Tautology

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper aims to describe syntactic patterns and meanings of tautology in Korean. It has been explained tautology by focusing upon two essential aspects. The first aspect is related to philosophical and classic semantic views of tautology focused on logic and meanings. The second is related to viewpoints associated with radical pragmatics, radical semantics and non-radicals. This paper takes radical semantic position. Furthermore, this paper classifies tautological utterances of Korean into three syntactic patterns; equatives, conditionals and adverb clauses to express time. Equatives are used in sentences following this format ('X nun X', 'X ga X', 'X mo X', 'X nun X, Y nun Y'), conditionals in this format ('p (u)myen p', 'p ramyen p', 'p eya p', 'p (i)myen p') and adverb clauses to express time in this format ('p ttay p'). Thus, this paper shows that tautological utterances of Korean have certain language-specific syntactic constructions that consistently contribute to the meaning of tautology.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 들어가는 말
• 2. 항진명제의 통사유형
• 3. 국어 항진명제의 의미
• 4. 맺는 말
• <참고문헌>
• [Abstract]

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Levinson, Stephen, "화용론" 한신문화사 1991

2 최중열, "항진명제(tautology)의 의미해석" (창간) : 139-150, 1992

3 이미순, "항진 명제 발화의 해석에 대한 재검토" 담화·인지언어학회 16 (16): 123-147, 2009

4 채 완, "조사 ‘-는’의 의미" 4 : 93-113, 1976

5 김준영, "입에 익은 우리 익은 말" 학고재 2006

6 이정애, "다문화의사소통론" 역락 2013

7 서정수, "국어문법" 지문당 2006

8 이정애, "국어 항진명제에 대한 의미 연구" 한국어의미학회 33 : 179-202, 2010

9 전혜영, "구어 담화에 나타나는 ‘X는 X다’ 표현의 화용 양상" 국어학회 (64) : 273-299, 2012

10 Wilson, Deirdre, "Truthfulness and relevance" 111 : 583-632, 2002

11 Wittgenstein, Ludwig J., "Tractatus：Logico-Philosophicus" Routledge & Kegan Paul 1961

12 Leech, Geoffrey, "Towards a Semantic Description of English" Longman 1969

13 Audi, R., "The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. 2nd" Cambridge University Press 1995

14 Wong, King-on, John, "Semanticsand pragmatics of tautology in Cantonese" The University of Hong Kong 2006

15 Saeed, JohnI, "Semantics. 2nd." Blackwell 2003

16 Leech, Geoffrey, "Semantics" Penguin Books 1981

17 Lehrer, A., "Semantic Fields and Lexical Structure" Norht-Holland, American Elsevier 1974

18 Sperber, Dan, "Relevance, 2nd" Blackwell 1995

19 Cole, Peter, "Radical pragmatics" Academic Press 1981

20 Okamoto, Shigeko, "Nominal‘Tautologies’in Japanese" 218-229, 1991

21 Fraser, Bruce, "Motor oil is motor oil：an account of English nominal tautologies" 12 : 215-220, 1988

22 Grice, Paul, "Logic and conversation" 3 : 41-58, 1975

23 Lyons, John, "Linguistic Semantics：An Introduction" Cambridge University Press 1995

24 Allan, K., "Linguistic Meaning" Routledge & Kegan Paul 1986

25 Swart, H., "Introduction to Natural Language Semantics" CSLI 1998

26 Trier, J., "Das sprachliche Feld. Eine Auseinandersetzung" 10 : 428-449, 1934

27 Farghal, M., "Colloquial jordanian arabic tautologies" 17 : 223-240, 1992

28 Wierzbicka, Anna, "BoyswillbeBoys：A rejoinder to Bruce Fraser" 12 : 221-224, 1988

29 Wierzbicka, Anna, "Boys willbe boys：“Radical Semantics” vs “Radical Pragmatics.”" 63 : 95-114, 1987

30 Ward, Gregory, "A pragmatic analysis of tautological utterances" 15 : 507-520, 1991