RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      민주화, 민족주의 그리고 대외정책 = 러시아 사례를 중심으로

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A77056345

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      ‘Democratic peace,’ which argues that democratic system avoids the war and, at least, respects the cooperation, cannot give us the sufficient answer to these questions in spite of its partial validity. Moreover, multifaceted and unclear definition of democracy also makes us fail to notice the various and complex phases of democratization. Therefore, the argument on the relationship between democracy and peace must be converted into the argument between democratization and peace. In specific, we must focus on the issue of how the democratization of one country could affect the decision?making process of foreign policy.
      Thus, the goal of this article is to critically examine the proposition, which maintains that the democratization process toward the normal state, by engendering the instability and orientation for change in domestic politics, can generate the tendency toward nationalistic tendency in foreign policy. Furthermore, it will study this theme in the case of comtemporary Russia in this regard.
      Jack Snyder(2000) urges us to give attention to the emergence of nationalism in the countries under democratization process and notices that democratization process contains the possible sources of nationalism and ethnic conflict. Snyder’s argument can be developed by examining the influence of democratization process on foreign policy in cases of Russia. As a result of this study, we can summarize several outcomes: First, by critically examining the proposition that democracy or democratization lead a peaceful foreign policy, we can find out some different stories which the case of Russia can tell about the debate around the ‘democratic peace,’ especially, on the argument of ‘democratic peace’ and ‘democratization toward the world peace’; Second, by examining the process of how democratization affects the foreign policy in Russia democratization process, we can find out the correlation between ‘democratization’ and ‘nationalistic foreign policy’; Third, this can even contribute to make a type of decision?making process of foreign policy in the case of non?Western countries model.
      번역하기

      ‘Democratic peace,’ which argues that democratic system avoids the war and, at least, respects the cooperation, cannot give us the sufficient answer to these questions in spite of its partial validity. Moreover, multifaceted and unclear definition...

      ‘Democratic peace,’ which argues that democratic system avoids the war and, at least, respects the cooperation, cannot give us the sufficient answer to these questions in spite of its partial validity. Moreover, multifaceted and unclear definition of democracy also makes us fail to notice the various and complex phases of democratization. Therefore, the argument on the relationship between democracy and peace must be converted into the argument between democratization and peace. In specific, we must focus on the issue of how the democratization of one country could affect the decision?making process of foreign policy.
      Thus, the goal of this article is to critically examine the proposition, which maintains that the democratization process toward the normal state, by engendering the instability and orientation for change in domestic politics, can generate the tendency toward nationalistic tendency in foreign policy. Furthermore, it will study this theme in the case of comtemporary Russia in this regard.
      Jack Snyder(2000) urges us to give attention to the emergence of nationalism in the countries under democratization process and notices that democratization process contains the possible sources of nationalism and ethnic conflict. Snyder’s argument can be developed by examining the influence of democratization process on foreign policy in cases of Russia. As a result of this study, we can summarize several outcomes: First, by critically examining the proposition that democracy or democratization lead a peaceful foreign policy, we can find out some different stories which the case of Russia can tell about the debate around the ‘democratic peace,’ especially, on the argument of ‘democratic peace’ and ‘democratization toward the world peace’; Second, by examining the process of how democratization affects the foreign policy in Russia democratization process, we can find out the correlation between ‘democratization’ and ‘nationalistic foreign policy’; Third, this can even contribute to make a type of decision?making process of foreign policy in the case of non?Western countries model.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 기존 연구의 검토와 연구방법
      • Ⅲ. 민주화와 소련/러시아의 대외정책 지향
      • Ⅳ. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 기존 연구의 검토와 연구방법
      • Ⅲ. 민주화와 소련/러시아의 대외정책 지향
      • Ⅳ. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      • ABSTRACT
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "포스트소비에트 공간에서의 러시안 디아스포라: 러시아의 인식, 정책과 이론적 측면" 2004

      2 "참 고 문 헌"

      3 "소련의 정체성의 위기 『소련과 러시아』" ” 한국슬라브학회 편 1992

      4 "러시아 대외정책과 외교 엘리트의 인식" 2003

      5 "과도기 러시아 정치문화의 성격" 2003

      6 "고전적 유라시아주의의 두 측면에 대한 일고찰" 1998

      7 "“The Paradox of Russian National Identity ” in Roman Szporluk National Identity and Ethnicity in Russia and the New States of Eurasia" 1994

      8 "“The End of the Russian Idea ” Studies in Soviet Thought 43" 1992

      9 "“The End of History" 1989

      10 "“The Emergence of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation" 1993

      1 "포스트소비에트 공간에서의 러시안 디아스포라: 러시아의 인식, 정책과 이론적 측면" 2004

      2 "참 고 문 헌"

      3 "소련의 정체성의 위기 『소련과 러시아』" ” 한국슬라브학회 편 1992

      4 "러시아 대외정책과 외교 엘리트의 인식" 2003

      5 "과도기 러시아 정치문화의 성격" 2003

      6 "고전적 유라시아주의의 두 측면에 대한 일고찰" 1998

      7 "“The Paradox of Russian National Identity ” in Roman Szporluk National Identity and Ethnicity in Russia and the New States of Eurasia" 1994

      8 "“The End of the Russian Idea ” Studies in Soviet Thought 43" 1992

      9 "“The End of History" 1989

      10 "“The Emergence of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation" 1993

      11 "“The Clash of Civilizations" 1993

      12 "“Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace" 1946–19861993

      13 "“Normalisation and Legitimation in Postcommunist Russia ” in S Developments in Russia and Post" Macmillan 1994

      14 "“Der ‘Eurasismus’ und die Suche nach einer neunen russischen Kulturidentitat" 1992

      15 "Россия: партиивыборывласть" 1996

      16 "Российский кризис и евразийская идея в современной российской политике" 1996

      17 "Результаты опросов" 1996

      18 "Дипломатический Вестник."

      19 "but Do Scholars Want to Bridge It" 1994

      20 "Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Response" Norton & Company 2000

      21 "Russian Politics and Society" 1996

      22 "Prospects for Democracy in Russia and Eastern Europe Center for Strategic and International Studies" 1993

      23 "Principles for the Post" Princeton Princeton University Press 1993

      24 "Nationalism and the Marketplace of Ideas" 1996

      25 "Evolution of Party System in Russia: Major Trends and Recent Developments" 2004

      26 "Democratization and the Danger of War" 1995

      27 "Democracy, Accountability, and Representation" Cambridge University Press 1999

      28 "Democracy and International Conflict:Evaluation of the Democratic Peace Proposi-tion University of South Carolina Press" 1995

      29 "Debating the Democratic Peace" 1996

      30 "21세기 러시아 정치와 국가전략" 2001

      31 "2002년형 반미그 정치심리학적 근원과 정치외교적 의의" 2004

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-09-23 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국슬라브학회 -> 한국슬라브․유라시아학회
      영문명 : The Korean Association Of Slavic Studies -> The Korean Association of Slavic-Eurasian Studies
      KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.53 0.53 0.42
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.37 0.35 0.583 0.16
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼