What is everydaylife? What are its central and ambient qualities, properties and dynamics in ꡔCritique of Everyday Lifeꡕ of Henri Lefebvre? To response this questions I searched ‘everydayness’ in cultural study traditions of a critical approac...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104647742
2005
-
KCI등재
학술저널
283-317(35쪽)
9
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
What is everydaylife? What are its central and ambient qualities, properties and dynamics in ꡔCritique of Everyday Lifeꡕ of Henri Lefebvre? To response this questions I searched ‘everydayness’ in cultural study traditions of a critical approac...
What is everydaylife? What are its central and ambient qualities, properties and dynamics in ꡔCritique of Everyday Lifeꡕ of Henri Lefebvre? To response this questions I searched ‘everydayness’ in cultural study traditions of a critical approach to the analysis of everydaylife. The strategy of sociocultural critique through the ‘problematization’ or ‘defamiliarization’ of the habitualized character of everydaylife is one that is well-established in the literature, especially for adherents of various neo-Marxisms. However, in recent years, several prominent critics have taken issue with the concept of defamiliarization, arguing that habit-bounded, ‘distracted’ and routinized character of the everyday cannot be easily contrasted with, or superceded by, the exceptional or the extraordinary. Such a position, it is suggested, both denigrateds the integrity of dailylife and promotes a kind of incipient transcendentalism.
The work of Henri Lefebvre is often taken to be representative in this regard, and various phenomenological-pragmatists are criticized to this position. In this article, I take by analyzing Lefebvre’s writings on such key points as his treatment of routine in everyday life, as well as his concept of totality, dialectics and critique. In summary, despite of many critics, Lefebvre does not promote a dualistic transcendentalism in which daily life is denigrated.
But in his everyday utopianism in which routine and creativity, the trival and the extraordinary, are viewed as productively interwined rather than opposed. As such I seek to defend the notion of ‘critique’ of everyday and totality in Lefebvre’s Thought.
신분투쟁의 마지막 시기(기원전 366~287년)에 대한 고찰 - 신귀족, 평민, 그리고 호민관 -
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2020-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2017-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2013-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 등재 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2008-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2006-06-10 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 전남사학 -> 역사학연구 | ![]() |
| 2006-03-21 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 전남사학회 -> 호남사학회영문명 : Chonnam Historical Association -> Honam Historical Association | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.68 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.63 | 0.6 | 1.183 | 0.18 |