RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    앙리 르페브르의 일상생활 비판 - 문화이론적 접근 - = Henri Lefebvre’s Critique of Everyday Life

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104647742

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    What is everydaylife? What are its central and ambient qualities, properties and dynamics in ꡔCritique of Everyday Lifeꡕ of Henri Lefebvre? To response this questions I searched ‘everydayness’ in cultural study traditions of a critical approach to the analysis of everydaylife. The strategy of sociocultural critique through the ‘problematization’ or ‘defamiliarization’ of the habitualized character of everydaylife is one that is well-established in the literature, especially for adherents of various neo-Marxisms. However, in recent years, several prominent critics have taken issue with the concept of defamiliarization, arguing that habit-bounded, ‘distracted’ and routinized character of the everyday cannot be easily contrasted with, or superceded by, the exceptional or the extraordinary. Such a position, it is suggested, both denigrateds the integrity of dailylife and promotes a kind of incipient transcendentalism.
    The work of Henri Lefebvre is often taken to be representative in this regard, and various phenomenological-pragmatists are criticized to this position. In this article, I take by analyzing Lefebvre’s writings on such key points as his treatment of routine in everyday life, as well as his concept of totality, dialectics and critique. In summary, despite of many critics, Lefebvre does not promote a dualistic transcendentalism in which daily life is denigrated.
    But in his everyday utopianism in which routine and creativity, the trival and the extraordinary, are viewed as productively interwined rather than opposed. As such I seek to defend the notion of ‘critique’ of everyday and totality in Lefebvre’s Thought.
    번역하기

    What is everydaylife? What are its central and ambient qualities, properties and dynamics in ꡔCritique of Everyday Lifeꡕ of Henri Lefebvre? To response this questions I searched ‘everydayness’ in cultural study traditions of a critical approac...

    What is everydaylife? What are its central and ambient qualities, properties and dynamics in ꡔCritique of Everyday Lifeꡕ of Henri Lefebvre? To response this questions I searched ‘everydayness’ in cultural study traditions of a critical approach to the analysis of everydaylife. The strategy of sociocultural critique through the ‘problematization’ or ‘defamiliarization’ of the habitualized character of everydaylife is one that is well-established in the literature, especially for adherents of various neo-Marxisms. However, in recent years, several prominent critics have taken issue with the concept of defamiliarization, arguing that habit-bounded, ‘distracted’ and routinized character of the everyday cannot be easily contrasted with, or superceded by, the exceptional or the extraordinary. Such a position, it is suggested, both denigrateds the integrity of dailylife and promotes a kind of incipient transcendentalism.
    The work of Henri Lefebvre is often taken to be representative in this regard, and various phenomenological-pragmatists are criticized to this position. In this article, I take by analyzing Lefebvre’s writings on such key points as his treatment of routine in everyday life, as well as his concept of totality, dialectics and critique. In summary, despite of many critics, Lefebvre does not promote a dualistic transcendentalism in which daily life is denigrated.
    But in his everyday utopianism in which routine and creativity, the trival and the extraordinary, are viewed as productively interwined rather than opposed. As such I seek to defend the notion of ‘critique’ of everyday and totality in Lefebvre’s Thought.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-06-10 학술지명변경 한글명 : 전남사학 -> 역사학연구 KCI등재
    2006-03-21 학회명변경 한글명 : 전남사학회 -> 호남사학회
    영문명 : Chonnam Historical Association -> Honam Historical Association
    KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.68 0.68 0.68
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.63 0.6 1.183 0.18
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼