역사지구 내 현대건축물 디자인심의 쟁점에 관한 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper explores critical issues, generated by the design review committees in historic districts, which deal with the construction of contemporary architecture in their historic contexts. The goal is to draw implications from those issues and to propose key points for better operations of design reviews in historic districts. As for the cases, it focuses on the projects of contemporary architecture in Bukchon, Jongno-gu, Seoul since 2006. The research methods include literature reviews, on-site observation, and content analyses of entire design review records since 2006, as well as interview surveys with architects who experienced design reviews in Bukchon. The results indicate that 1) both design reviewers and reviewees were sympathized with the importance of ‘context’ in historic district but interpretation differences exists from one another. Thus, to build well-designed contemporary architecture in historic districts, the consensus on the specific contents of the ‘context’ must be achieved and those contents needs to be forged into specific design guidelines and vocabulary. 2) both administrative review and discretionary design review need to be well balanced, and to operate well, design guidelines and guidelines for design review must be specifically organized and be shared by both reviewers and reviewees. This paper contributes to illuminate the shortcomings and problems of design review in historic districts and to providing bases for the improvements of design review system in future studies.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• 1. 서론
• 2. 선행연구 고찰
• 3. 북촌 역사지구 내 현대건축물 관련 디자인심의 쟁점
• 4. 건축가 인터뷰
• 5. 디자인 심의의 개선 방향 설정을 위한 제안: 역사지구 내 현대건축물 관련 국제원칙
• 6. 결론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "종로구 홈페이지"

2 김은중, "서울시 일반건축물 심의제도와 그 문제점에 관한 연역적 연구" 14 (14): 1998

3 권기범, "서울시 건축심의제도의 운영상 문제점과 개선방안 연구:최근 2005년~2006년 서울시 건축심의를 중심으로" 서울연구원 8 (8): 65-84, 2007

4 서울특별시, "북촌 제1종지구단위계획" 2010

5 박소현, "문화유산보존을 위한 국제원칙 경향 및 특성에관한 연구" 문화재청 2010

6 박소현, "디자인 가이드라인+디자인 심의: 미국 시애틀시의경우를 중심으로 한 시사점" 63-70, 2008

7 이창무, "건축심의제도 운영에 관한 관련그룹간 인식차이에 관한 연구" 16 (16): 2000

8 김도년, "건축심의제도 개선 연구" 서울연구원 1998

9 Beasley, E., "In Design Review : Challenging Urban Aesthetic Control" Chapman & Hall 1994

10 Dawson, E., "How Planning Authorities Can Improve Quality through the Design Review Process:Lessons from Edinburgh" 14 (14): 2009

11 Punter, J, "From Design Advice to Peer Review: The Role of the Urban Design Panel in Vancouver" 8 (8): 2003

12 Punter, J, "Developments in Urban Design Review: The Lessons of West Coast Cities of the United States for British Practice" 1 (1): 1996

13 Nasar, J. L., "Design Review Reviewed" 65 (65): 1999

14 Scheer, B. C., "Design Review :Challenging Urban Aesthetic Control" Chapman & Hall 1994