학교용지부담금과 미국의 학교영향부담금 제도의 비교 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Reports on population movement(2000-2030) by the National Statistical Office show that the number of elementary school age population will be decreased by 1.4million from 2005 to 2020. Nevertheless, the needs of new school have been required due to a lot of new city and housing developments. It may follow new community without a school, increase the inequality of school facility service and bring press on the local finance.
『The exemption law of securing school land』 was enacted in 1995 for securing school lands in new housing development project. But the Constitutional Court decided in 2005 that it is against the constitution with the legal principles such as the principles of compulsory education and the principles of proportion.
This study reviews the problems of the law and exaction system at present, and then explores the development impact fees and school impact fees in America, which is defined as a monetary exaction charged by a local government agency to an applicant in connection with approval of develop project for the purpose of defraying a portion of the cost of school facilities related to the development project. With comparative study on school land fees in Korea and school impact fees, this study suggests to apply the exaction system based on cost accounting approach, the rational nexus test and the citizen's participation in the exaction processes.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• 1. 서론
• 2. 미국의 개발영향부담금 제도
• 3. 미국의 학교영향부담금(school impact fees) 제도
• 4. 학교용지부담금과 학교영향부담금 제도 비교
• 5. 미국 학교영향부담금제도의 시사점
• 6. 결론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 윤흥주, "학교용지확보제도의 성과 및 과제" 20 (20): 2007

2 하봉운, "학교용지확보등에관한 특례법의 쟁점과 과제" 한국교육재정경제학회 14 (14): 85-110, 2005

3 교육인적자원부, "학교용지확보 효율화 방안 개선연구, 정책연구과제" 2002

4 강운산, "학교용지부담금제도의 문제점과 개선방안" 한국건설산업연구원 2003

5 박정훈, "학교용지부담금의 합헌성 기준에 관한 해석론, 토지 공법연구" 30 : 2006

6 천세영, "지방교육재정구조 혁신 전략 연구" 교육인적자원부 2006

7 김현아, "지방공공재의 비용부담 원칙에 관한 연구" 한국조세연구원 2004

8 김현아, "지방공공재의 비용부담 원칙에 관한 연구" 한국조세연구원 2004

9 Lee County, "The Lee Plan, Policy 110.5, 2006. 6"

10 James C.Nicholas, "School Impact Fee Update Study" Ducan Associates, Lee County, Florida 2005

11 Downing & Frank, "Recreational Impact Fees: Characteristics and Current Usage" 36 : 1983-, 1983

12 Frank, James E, "Patterns of Impact Fee Use. In Development Impact Fees: Policy Rationale, Practice, Theory, and Issues" 1988

13 Clancy Mullen, "National Impact Fee Survey:2007"

14 "Lee County Land Development Code, Sec. 2-410"

15 "Impact Fee Development for New Hampshire Communities, Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission, 1999.7"

16 Kirwan, "Finance for Urban Public Infrastructure" 26 : 1989

17 "Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County v, 334 S.E.2d 542" SieGray Developers, Inc 1985

18 Nicolas, James C, "A practitioner Guide to development Impact Fees" American Planning Association 1991

19 Department of Housing and Community Development, ""Pay to Play" Residential development fees in California Cities and Counties" California 2001