RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    반응 중심 문학교육에 대한 비판적 고찰 = A Critical Research on the Response-centered Literature Education

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104630022

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This thesis is aiming to research critically about the theory of response-centered literature education. Particularly, I intended to investigate the Rosenblatt's theory on 'response', 'efferent & aesthetic stance', and it's reflections in elementary Korean language textbooks. I think this theory has some problems as theory of literature education in Korean classrooms that the students are over forties, and Korean language textbooks could not adopted the theory desirably.I, therefore, want to seek the problems of the theory when it is used as a educational methods. Next, I want to corroborate the problems in the textbooks how the theory is practiced.To conclude, I could find out some basic problems of this theory, because it is not educational theory but literary one. The alternative is how we choose good literary texts and contain the full text in the textbook. And then, we have to give students enough time and they can respond to literary texts.
    번역하기

    This thesis is aiming to research critically about the theory of response-centered literature education. Particularly, I intended to investigate the Rosenblatt's theory on 'response', 'efferent & aesthetic stance', and it's reflections in elementary K...

    This thesis is aiming to research critically about the theory of response-centered literature education. Particularly, I intended to investigate the Rosenblatt's theory on 'response', 'efferent & aesthetic stance', and it's reflections in elementary Korean language textbooks. I think this theory has some problems as theory of literature education in Korean classrooms that the students are over forties, and Korean language textbooks could not adopted the theory desirably.I, therefore, want to seek the problems of the theory when it is used as a educational methods. Next, I want to corroborate the problems in the textbooks how the theory is practiced.To conclude, I could find out some basic problems of this theory, because it is not educational theory but literary one. The alternative is how we choose good literary texts and contain the full text in the textbook. And then, we have to give students enough time and they can respond to literary texts.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 황지우, "오월의 신부" 문학과지성사 2000

    2 경규진, "반응중심문학교육의 방법 연구" 1993

    3 이대규, "국어과 교육과정의 분석과 평가" 1985

    4 宮地 裕, "國語 三年 上 わかば 光村" 書柱式會社 2003

    5 Rosenblatt L.M, "retrospect and prospect" The Modern Language Association 1995

    6 Probst R, "Transactional theory in the teaching of literature" 1987

    7 Cox C, "Towards an understanding of the aesthetic response to literature" Univ. of Calgary 2000

    8 Rosenblatt L, "Theory into practice" 1982

    9 Rosenblatt L, "The transactional theory of the literary work Implications for research Researching response to literature and the teaching of literature" In C 1985

    10 Squire J, "The responses of adolescent while reading four short stories" 1964

    1 황지우, "오월의 신부" 문학과지성사 2000

    2 경규진, "반응중심문학교육의 방법 연구" 1993

    3 이대규, "국어과 교육과정의 분석과 평가" 1985

    4 宮地 裕, "國語 三年 上 わかば 光村" 書柱式會社 2003

    5 Rosenblatt L.M, "retrospect and prospect" The Modern Language Association 1995

    6 Probst R, "Transactional theory in the teaching of literature" 1987

    7 Cox C, "Towards an understanding of the aesthetic response to literature" Univ. of Calgary 2000

    8 Rosenblatt L, "Theory into practice" 1982

    9 Rosenblatt L, "The transactional theory of the literary work Implications for research Researching response to literature and the teaching of literature" In C 1985

    10 Squire J, "The responses of adolescent while reading four short stories" 1964

    11 Karolides N.J, "The reading process: Transactional theory in action"" 1997

    12 Rosenblatt L, "The reader the text the poem-The transactional theory of the literary work" Southern Illinois University Press 1978

    13 O'Brien B, "The process of responding to literature" Columbia Univ 1981

    14 Holt A, "The effects of traditional and response-based approaches to teaching literature on student involvement" Georgia state university 1986

    15 "Research in response to literature Journal of Research and Development in Education" 1983

    16 Mingshui Cai, "Reflections on transactional theory as a theoretical guide for literacy and literature education" Christopher-Gordon Publisher Inc 14 (14): 2001

    17 Probst R, "Literature as exploration and the classroom Transactions with literature" 1990

    18 Rosenblatt L.M, "Literature as exploration" The Modern Language Association 1995

    19 Purves A, "Elements of writing about literary work A study of response to literature" 1968

    20 Beach R, "Discourse conventions and researching response to literature to literary dialogue Researching response to literature and the teaching of literature Points of departure" In C 1985

    21 Holland K, "Dance between stances Children's response to literature" Heinemann 1993

    22 Purves A, "Can literature be rescued from reading? Transactions with literature" 1990

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.56 0.56 0.56
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.54 0.53 0.99 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼