RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      행정입법 통제를 위한 국회법 개정안 파동의 헌법적 함의 = Revision of Congress Act in the Perspective of Constitutional Law

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109280124

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This year, Korean Congress tried to revise Article 98-2 of Congress Act and reinforce the control power of Korean Congress against the administrative regulation. The bill passed the plenary session of the Congress but the President exercised veto power against the bill alleging that the bill was against the Constitution. This paper aims at examining whether the bill is against the Constitution as the President alleged it and analyzing the case in the perspective of constitutional law. To achieve the aim, this paper will overview the history of congressional review system of administrative regulation in Korea at first, and will examine whether the bill is against the Constitution violating the separation of power principle provided in Korean Constitutional Law. It will also examine the congressional review system of administrative regulation in the United States as well as in the United Kingdom in the comparative law perspective. Finally, based on the examinations, this paper will explore the desirable reform measures in congressional review system of administrative regulation in Korea.
      번역하기

      This year, Korean Congress tried to revise Article 98-2 of Congress Act and reinforce the control power of Korean Congress against the administrative regulation. The bill passed the plenary session of the Congress but the President exercised veto powe...

      This year, Korean Congress tried to revise Article 98-2 of Congress Act and reinforce the control power of Korean Congress against the administrative regulation. The bill passed the plenary session of the Congress but the President exercised veto power against the bill alleging that the bill was against the Constitution. This paper aims at examining whether the bill is against the Constitution as the President alleged it and analyzing the case in the perspective of constitutional law. To achieve the aim, this paper will overview the history of congressional review system of administrative regulation in Korea at first, and will examine whether the bill is against the Constitution violating the separation of power principle provided in Korean Constitutional Law. It will also examine the congressional review system of administrative regulation in the United States as well as in the United Kingdom in the comparative law perspective. Finally, based on the examinations, this paper will explore the desirable reform measures in congressional review system of administrative regulation in Korea.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼