RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    학교 자율화 정책의 특성과 과제 -5,31 교육개혁에서 4,15 학교자율화 추진계획까지- = A Study on the Policy to Promote the School self-regulation -from 5,31 educational reform to 4,15 school self-regulation action plan-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75040946

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to find the suggestions for `Policy to promote the school self-regulation` under the view of Educational autonomy. For this, I analyzed the relation of `Educational autonomy` and `Local autonomy`, and `School autonomy`. The autonomy of school means that educational staffs including the teacher decide educational plan and organization and operate it independently. Basically the autonomy of school means the completion of local autonomy in education. And, I analyzed the past and now `Policy to promote the school self-regulation`. For example, It contains School management committee, School united accounts system, Invited school principal, Deregulated school, School and teacher evaluation. But, the result of school reform policy is not sufficient to really promote the Educational autonomy in school. Especially the policy focused on the Secondary education than elementary education. As a conclusion, First, what ultimately determines the success or failure of the local autonomy in education is how to well it is practical in a school unit. Second, the deregulation of school can not guarantee the Educational autonomy in school. So, the policy of autonomy must be more practically concreted, and the distribution of power in educational administration should be more propelled among the nation-province-school levels. Third, the principal centered structure and process in school decision-making should be changed to more pluralistic system than now. For this, it is necessary to confirm the teacher and parents and student`s legal status as a autonomy organization. Finally we should regard the guarantee of Right to education as final purpose of policy to promote the school self-regulation or reform the educational autonomy system.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to find the suggestions for `Policy to promote the school self-regulation` under the view of Educational autonomy. For this, I analyzed the relation of `Educational autonomy` and `Local autonomy`, and `School autonomy`. Th...

    The purpose of this study is to find the suggestions for `Policy to promote the school self-regulation` under the view of Educational autonomy. For this, I analyzed the relation of `Educational autonomy` and `Local autonomy`, and `School autonomy`. The autonomy of school means that educational staffs including the teacher decide educational plan and organization and operate it independently. Basically the autonomy of school means the completion of local autonomy in education. And, I analyzed the past and now `Policy to promote the school self-regulation`. For example, It contains School management committee, School united accounts system, Invited school principal, Deregulated school, School and teacher evaluation. But, the result of school reform policy is not sufficient to really promote the Educational autonomy in school. Especially the policy focused on the Secondary education than elementary education. As a conclusion, First, what ultimately determines the success or failure of the local autonomy in education is how to well it is practical in a school unit. Second, the deregulation of school can not guarantee the Educational autonomy in school. So, the policy of autonomy must be more practically concreted, and the distribution of power in educational administration should be more propelled among the nation-province-school levels. Third, the principal centered structure and process in school decision-making should be changed to more pluralistic system than now. For this, it is necessary to confirm the teacher and parents and student`s legal status as a autonomy organization. Finally we should regard the guarantee of Right to education as final purpose of policy to promote the school self-regulation or reform the educational autonomy system.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼