RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    일본 민설공원 제도의 특성과 시사점 = Characteristics and Policy Implications of Private Development Parks in Japan

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101830081

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Urban park planning has become difficult due to the lack of municipal funds. Thereupon, a special scheme was imposed for city park planning. Since then, a legal amendment was made for economical improvement and more active participation. However, there are a lot of questions about whether it was a suitable direction for parks and where it should be emphasized for public interest. Base on these concerns, this study examined the basis and characteristics of location, creation, and maintenance of private development parks in Japan, which was the policy model of Korean private parks. Location and space planning of private development parks was made up considering an effective green network and disaster prevention function, and a minimum area was about 1.42ha. The minimum area, 1ha, was established on the basis of considering realistic possibilities, disaster protection, and universal validity. It was also amended to consider the standard of type two mid- to high-rise exclusive residential areas and consultation with regional governance. Finally, it was built on the lowest limit of ordinance of the relevant city; for example, 100% of the floor area ratio, 30% of the building coverage ratio, and the maximum height of 11 stories, etc. For maintenance, private and public sectors were working together. Maintenance fees for 35 years (based on $300yen/m^2$ per month) were paid en bloc by the licensee. However, the city was paid for facilities that accompanied excessive maintenance costs. Meanwhile, it seemed difficult to introduce attractive profit facilities because of the limitations in location, usage permission, and introduction equipment; furthermore, there were problems with management authority, and the burden of expenses was deducted. For creating private Korean parks, this study suggested that we should build priority of creating city parks and select appropriate locations first; also, we need to make criteria for location, creation, and standard management rules that are relevant to the whole nation of Korea.
    번역하기

    Urban park planning has become difficult due to the lack of municipal funds. Thereupon, a special scheme was imposed for city park planning. Since then, a legal amendment was made for economical improvement and more active participation. However, ther...

    Urban park planning has become difficult due to the lack of municipal funds. Thereupon, a special scheme was imposed for city park planning. Since then, a legal amendment was made for economical improvement and more active participation. However, there are a lot of questions about whether it was a suitable direction for parks and where it should be emphasized for public interest. Base on these concerns, this study examined the basis and characteristics of location, creation, and maintenance of private development parks in Japan, which was the policy model of Korean private parks. Location and space planning of private development parks was made up considering an effective green network and disaster prevention function, and a minimum area was about 1.42ha. The minimum area, 1ha, was established on the basis of considering realistic possibilities, disaster protection, and universal validity. It was also amended to consider the standard of type two mid- to high-rise exclusive residential areas and consultation with regional governance. Finally, it was built on the lowest limit of ordinance of the relevant city; for example, 100% of the floor area ratio, 30% of the building coverage ratio, and the maximum height of 11 stories, etc. For maintenance, private and public sectors were working together. Maintenance fees for 35 years (based on $300yen/m^2$ per month) were paid en bloc by the licensee. However, the city was paid for facilities that accompanied excessive maintenance costs. Meanwhile, it seemed difficult to introduce attractive profit facilities because of the limitations in location, usage permission, and introduction equipment; furthermore, there were problems with management authority, and the burden of expenses was deducted. For creating private Korean parks, this study suggested that we should build priority of creating city parks and select appropriate locations first; also, we need to make criteria for location, creation, and standard management rules that are relevant to the whole nation of Korea.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이종원, "정책 사례연구 방법의 활용 현황과 발전을 위한 제언 -비교사회과학 방법론의 논의를 중심으로-" 한국거버넌스학회 18 (18): 1-20, 2011

    2 김현, "일본 국영공원 관리 특성 분석" 한국환경복원기술학회 15 (15): 1-17, 2012

    3 Kawasaki, Y, "Study on the redevelopment of suburban amusement parks which railroad companies managed" 49 (49): 273-278, 2014

    4 Uemura, M., "Study on the open space of the city as seen from the spatial analysis of the privately owned public space" 285-286, 2014

    5 Tajima, K., "Public-private partnerships for parks and open spaces in New York city" 63 (63): 51-69, 2010

    6 Kawai, M., "Practical using of the Ppen Space in the city center and its effectiveness: A case study of use for the event in Osaka(Chuo-ku and Kita-ku)" 805-806, 2009

    7 Minai, N., "Planning issue of closed amusement parks: Study on publication of public used private land" 697-698, 2006

    8 Parks & Open Space Association of Japan, "Guideline of Urban Park Law"

    9 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, "Guideline for planning and design of disaster prevention parks(draft)" NILIM 2015

    10 Tsuji, Y., "Astudy on the implementation of the system of park on leased land" 49 (49): 255-260, 2014

    1 이종원, "정책 사례연구 방법의 활용 현황과 발전을 위한 제언 -비교사회과학 방법론의 논의를 중심으로-" 한국거버넌스학회 18 (18): 1-20, 2011

    2 김현, "일본 국영공원 관리 특성 분석" 한국환경복원기술학회 15 (15): 1-17, 2012

    3 Kawasaki, Y, "Study on the redevelopment of suburban amusement parks which railroad companies managed" 49 (49): 273-278, 2014

    4 Uemura, M., "Study on the open space of the city as seen from the spatial analysis of the privately owned public space" 285-286, 2014

    5 Tajima, K., "Public-private partnerships for parks and open spaces in New York city" 63 (63): 51-69, 2010

    6 Kawai, M., "Practical using of the Ppen Space in the city center and its effectiveness: A case study of use for the event in Osaka(Chuo-ku and Kita-ku)" 805-806, 2009

    7 Minai, N., "Planning issue of closed amusement parks: Study on publication of public used private land" 697-698, 2006

    8 Parks & Open Space Association of Japan, "Guideline of Urban Park Law"

    9 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, "Guideline for planning and design of disaster prevention parks(draft)" NILIM 2015

    10 Tsuji, Y., "Astudy on the implementation of the system of park on leased land" 49 (49): 255-260, 2014

    11 Shimomura, Y., "Amendment of urban park act, article 5 and park facilities set up by non-governmental sectors" 76 (76): 697-702, 2013

    12 Soda, O., "A study on getting the basic principles in public space" 119 (119): 36-39, 2004

    13 Land and Housing Institute, "A Study on the System of Park on Leased Land" 2012

    14 Jung, J. K., "A Study on the Private Capital Utilization Method and Characteristics of Private Development Parks in Japan" Hankyung National University 2014

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2020 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2015-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-05-20 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2000-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.74 0.74 0.78
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.76 0.74 1.022 0.14
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼