RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      OECD 국가의 삶의 질의 구조에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Structure of Quality of Life in OECD Member Countries

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103529686

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper considers what constitutes the quality of life based on the review of theories and overseas cases. It then analyzes main factors of happiness in OECD countries, and measures weights and rankings of member countries by applying the principal component analysis to sub-indices, starting from OECD`s Better Life Index(BLI) with some portion of which amended in accordance with theories. As a result of the analysis, we found that stable living and fairness in income distribution are the foremost and second important factors, respectively, explaining happiness of OECD member countries. The former specifically implies that people in countries with stable household income and in economies with stable employment are healthier, living in pleasant dwellings, well-equipped with social capital, and enjoying happy life generally, while the latter is interpreted in such a way that countries with fairer distribution of wealth more likely have the lesser number of poor people and are surrounded by securer environment. Finally, it was derived that Korea ranked the 32nd, belonging to the lowest ranking group, compared with the rank of the 22nd in OECD`s BLI assessed with equal weights, which urgently call for government`s plans and actions to enhance happiness of people from a perspective of both growth and distribution.
      번역하기

      This paper considers what constitutes the quality of life based on the review of theories and overseas cases. It then analyzes main factors of happiness in OECD countries, and measures weights and rankings of member countries by applying the principal...

      This paper considers what constitutes the quality of life based on the review of theories and overseas cases. It then analyzes main factors of happiness in OECD countries, and measures weights and rankings of member countries by applying the principal component analysis to sub-indices, starting from OECD`s Better Life Index(BLI) with some portion of which amended in accordance with theories. As a result of the analysis, we found that stable living and fairness in income distribution are the foremost and second important factors, respectively, explaining happiness of OECD member countries. The former specifically implies that people in countries with stable household income and in economies with stable employment are healthier, living in pleasant dwellings, well-equipped with social capital, and enjoying happy life generally, while the latter is interpreted in such a way that countries with fairer distribution of wealth more likely have the lesser number of poor people and are surrounded by securer environment. Finally, it was derived that Korea ranked the 32nd, belonging to the lowest ranking group, compared with the rank of the 22nd in OECD`s BLI assessed with equal weights, which urgently call for government`s plans and actions to enhance happiness of people from a perspective of both growth and distribution.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Nussbaum, M., "Women and human development: The capabilities approach" Cambridge University Press 2000

      2 Easterlin, R., "Will Raising the Incomes of All Increase the Happiness of All?" 27 : 35-47, 1995

      3 Frey, B., "What can economists learn from happiness research?" 40 : 402-435, 2002

      4 Eggers, A., "Well-being and unemployment in Russia in the 1990’s: can society’s suffering be individuals’ solace?" 35 (35): 209-242, 2006

      5 Hagerty M., "Wealth and happiness revisited: Growing national income does go with greater happiness" 64 : 1-27, 2003

      6 Clark, D., "Visions of Development : A Study of Human Values" Edward Elgar 2002

      7 Kahneman, D., "Toward National Well-Being Accounts" 94 (94): 429-434, 2004

      8 Veblen, T., "Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institutions" The Macmillan Company 1899

      9 Stutzer, A., "The role of social work norms in job searching and subjective well-being" 2 : 696-719, 2004

      10 Easterlin R., "The happiness-income paradox revisited" 107 (107): 22463-22468, 2010

      1 Nussbaum, M., "Women and human development: The capabilities approach" Cambridge University Press 2000

      2 Easterlin, R., "Will Raising the Incomes of All Increase the Happiness of All?" 27 : 35-47, 1995

      3 Frey, B., "What can economists learn from happiness research?" 40 : 402-435, 2002

      4 Eggers, A., "Well-being and unemployment in Russia in the 1990’s: can society’s suffering be individuals’ solace?" 35 (35): 209-242, 2006

      5 Hagerty M., "Wealth and happiness revisited: Growing national income does go with greater happiness" 64 : 1-27, 2003

      6 Clark, D., "Visions of Development : A Study of Human Values" Edward Elgar 2002

      7 Kahneman, D., "Toward National Well-Being Accounts" 94 (94): 429-434, 2004

      8 Veblen, T., "Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institutions" The Macmillan Company 1899

      9 Stutzer, A., "The role of social work norms in job searching and subjective well-being" 2 : 696-719, 2004

      10 Easterlin R., "The happiness-income paradox revisited" 107 (107): 22463-22468, 2010

      11 Wilkinson, R., "The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better" Allen Lane 2009

      12 Snowdon, C., "The Spirit Level Delusion: Fact-checking the Left's New Theory of Everything" Democracy Institute 2010

      13 Alkire, S., "The Human Development and Capability Approach, In An Introduction to the Human Development and Capability Approach, Sterling" Earthscan 2009

      14 World Economic Forum, "The Global Gender Gap Report 2010"

      15 EIU, "The Economist Intelligence Unit’s quality-of-life index"

      16 Clark, D., "The Capability Approach: Its Development, Critiques and Recent Advances’, In Development Studies" Atlantic Books and Distributors 105-127, 2008

      17 UNDP, "Technical notes, Human Development Report 2010"

      18 Newsweek, "THE WORLD’S BETST COUNTRIES"

      19 Nicoletti, G., "Summary Indicators of Product Market Regulation with an extension to Employment Protection Legislation" OECD 2000

      20 Hagerty M., "Rising happiness in nations 1946–2004: A reply to Easterlin" 79 : 421-436, 2006

      21 Sen, A., "Rationality and social choice" 85 : 1-24, 1995

      22 Wackernagel, M., "Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth" New Society Publishers 1996

      23 김용하, "OECD 국가의 행복지수 산정에 관한 연구" 한국보건사회연구원 2009

      24 김용하, "OECD 국가의 복지지표 비교 연구" 한국보건사회연구원 2011

      25 Luttmer, F., "Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being" 120 (120): 963-1002, 2005

      26 Sen, A., "Inequality Reexamined" Harvard University Press 1992

      27 Duesenberry, J. S., "Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behavior" Harvard University Press 1949

      28 Sen, A., "Human Rights and Capabilities" 6 (6): 151-166, 2005

      29 Frey, B., "Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect well-being" Princeton University Pres 2002

      30 Stevenson, B., "Happiness Inequality in the United States" 37 (37): 33-79, 2008

      31 OECD, "Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators, METHODOLOGY AND USER GUIDE"

      32 Ura, D. K., "Gross National Happiness as larger Context for Healing and Global Change"

      33 Velicer, W. F., "Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery" 3 : 231-251, 1998

      34 Global Footprint Network, "ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT ATLAS 2010" 2010

      35 Norberg, J., "Dr Friedman and Mr Hyde: The Rise of Disaster Polemics" 24 (24): 7-12, 2008

      36 Easterlin, R., "Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot?, In Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz" Academic Press 1974

      37 Sen, A., "Development as Freedom" Oxford University Press 1999

      38 Stiglitz, J., "Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress"

      39 Pickett, K., "Child wellbeing and income inequality in rich societies: ecological cross sectional study" 335 : 1080-1085, 2007

      40 Narayan, D., "Cents and Sociability - Household Income and Social Capital in Rural Tanzania" Social Development Department, World Bank 1997

      41 Alkire, S., "Capability and Functionings: Definition & Justification"

      42 Global Footprint Network, "CALCULATION METHODOLOGY FOR THE NATIONAL FOOTPRINT ACCOUNTS" 2010

      43 Putnam, R., "Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital" 6 (6): 65-78, 1995

      44 Diener, E., "Beyond Money: Toward an economy of well-being" 5 (5): 1-31, 2004

      45 Solnick, S. J., "Are Positional Concerns Stronger in Some Domains Than in Others?" 95 (95): 147-151, 2005

      46 OECD, "2010 Society at a glance"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-04-25 학술지등록 한글명 : 보건사회연구
      외국어명 : Health and Social Welfare Review
      KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 등재 SCOPUS 등재 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.79 1.79 1.91
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.06 2.16 2.497 0.32
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼