RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국인의 보편적 신뢰 영향 요인에 관한 연구 = 시민의 사회참여행동과 사회적 불평등 인식의 영향력 검증

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99855529

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    By using the data about Koreans’ Perceptions on Social Elites conducted by the authors and the Korea Research, his article comprehensively examines effect of civic engagement suggested by Putnam (1993) and of inequality suggested by Uslaner (2003) on generalized trust. In addition, it also attempts to examine interaction effect of civic engagement and inequality on generalized trust. The authors present a multiple regression model on the effects of civic engagement, inequality, and interaction on generalized trust, controlling for other related factors. Findings indicate that while civic engagement is not a significant determinant of generalized trust, inequality is a significant determinant of generalized trust. In addition, there are significant interaction effects between civic engagement and inequality on generalized trust. Finally, this article discusses theoretical and practical implications upon the findings.
    번역하기

    By using the data about Koreans’ Perceptions on Social Elites conducted by the authors and the Korea Research, his article comprehensively examines effect of civic engagement suggested by Putnam (1993) and of inequality suggested by Uslaner (2003) o...

    By using the data about Koreans’ Perceptions on Social Elites conducted by the authors and the Korea Research, his article comprehensively examines effect of civic engagement suggested by Putnam (1993) and of inequality suggested by Uslaner (2003) on generalized trust. In addition, it also attempts to examine interaction effect of civic engagement and inequality on generalized trust. The authors present a multiple regression model on the effects of civic engagement, inequality, and interaction on generalized trust, controlling for other related factors. Findings indicate that while civic engagement is not a significant determinant of generalized trust, inequality is a significant determinant of generalized trust. In addition, there are significant interaction effects between civic engagement and inequality on generalized trust. Finally, this article discusses theoretical and practical implications upon the findings.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 송호근, "한국의 평등주의, 그 마음의 습관" 삼성경제연구소 2006

    2 신기현, "한국 지도층의 평등인식 : 경험적 분석" 전북대학교 1989

    3 "제3의자본" 삼성경제연구소 2009

    4 박병진, "신뢰형성에 있어 사회참여와 제도의 역할" 한국사회학회 41 (41): 65-105, 2007

    5 박찬웅, "신뢰의 위기와 사회적 자본" 19 (19): 33-64, 1999

    6 이유재, "상호작용효과를 포함한 다중회귀분석에서 주효과의 검증에 대한 연구" 23 (23): 183-210, 1994

    7 박희봉, "불신에서 신뢰로" 한국정부학회 21 (21): 1271-1300, 2009

    8 한승조, "리더쉽 이론과 한국정치" 민족지성사 1988

    9 강철희, "기부 및 자원봉사와 신뢰의 관계에 관한 연구 : Simultaneous Equation Model을 이용한 분석" 한국사회복지학회 59 (59): 5-32, 2007

    10 Tyler, T. R, "Why do people rely upon others: Social identity and the social aspects of trust, In Trust in Society" Thousand Oaks 285-306, 2001

    1 송호근, "한국의 평등주의, 그 마음의 습관" 삼성경제연구소 2006

    2 신기현, "한국 지도층의 평등인식 : 경험적 분석" 전북대학교 1989

    3 "제3의자본" 삼성경제연구소 2009

    4 박병진, "신뢰형성에 있어 사회참여와 제도의 역할" 한국사회학회 41 (41): 65-105, 2007

    5 박찬웅, "신뢰의 위기와 사회적 자본" 19 (19): 33-64, 1999

    6 이유재, "상호작용효과를 포함한 다중회귀분석에서 주효과의 검증에 대한 연구" 23 (23): 183-210, 1994

    7 박희봉, "불신에서 신뢰로" 한국정부학회 21 (21): 1271-1300, 2009

    8 한승조, "리더쉽 이론과 한국정치" 민족지성사 1988

    9 강철희, "기부 및 자원봉사와 신뢰의 관계에 관한 연구 : Simultaneous Equation Model을 이용한 분석" 한국사회복지학회 59 (59): 5-32, 2007

    10 Tyler, T. R, "Why do people rely upon others: Social identity and the social aspects of trust, In Trust in Society" Thousand Oaks 285-306, 2001

    11 Kang, C. H, "What gives? Cross-national differences in students’ giving behavior" 48 (48): 283-294, 2011

    12 Verba, S, "Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics" Harvard University Press 1995

    13 Brambor, T, "Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses" 14 : 63-82, 2006

    14 Warner, L. D, "Undergraduate psychology students' views of counselors, psychiatrists, and psychologists: a challenge to academic psychologists" 22 : 138-140, 1991

    15 Stolle, D, "Trusting strangers: The concept of generalized trust in perspective" 31 : 397-412, 2002

    16 Claibourn, M. P, "Trusting and joining? An empirical test of the reciprocal nature of social capital" 22 : 267-291, 2002

    17 Fukuyama, F, "Trust: The social virtues and creation of prosperity" 1995

    18 Gambetta, D, "Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations" 1988

    19 Hardin, R, "Trust and trustworthiness" The Russell Sage Foundation Series on Trust 2002

    20 Dunn, J, "Trust and political agency, in: Diego Cambetta" Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations 73-93, 1988

    21 Yamagishi, T, "Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan" 18 : 129-166, 1994

    22 Hardin, R, "The street-level epistemology of trust" 21 (21): 505-529, 1993

    23 Seligman, A, "The problem of trust" Princeton 1997

    24 Allport, G. W, "The nature of prejudice" Addison-Wesley 1954

    25 Uslaner, E. M, "The moral foundations of trust" Cambridge University Press 2002

    26 Alesina, A, "The determinants of trust , In Economic Research Working Paper Series" National Bureau 2000

    27 Lichbach, M, I, "The Cooperator's dilemma" 1996

    28 Bottero, W, "Stratification: Social division and inequality" Routledge 2005

    29 Tajfel, H, "Social identity and intergroup behavior" 13 (13): 65-93, 1974

    30 Kawachi, I, "Social capital, income inequality, and mortality" 87 : 1491-1497, 1997

    31 Gundelach, P, "Social capital and the democratic role of voluntary associations" 1997

    32 Uslaner, E. M, "Segregation and Mistrust: Diversity, Isolation, and Social Cohesion" Cambridge University Press 2012

    33 Webb, A. R, "Prototype of a profession: Psychology's public mage" 17 : 5-9, 1986

    34 Staub, E, "Positive social behavior and morality" 1978

    35 Putnam, R. D, "Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy" Princeton University Press 1993

    36 Rotter, J. B, "Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness and gullibility" 35 (35): 1-7, 1980

    37 Uslaner, E. M, "Inequality, trust, and civic engagement" 31 : 1-28, 2005

    38 Brehm, J, "Individual level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital" 41 : 88-102, 1997

    39 Knack, S, "Groups, growth and trust: Cross-country evidence on the Olson and Putnam hypotheses" 117 : 341-355, 2003

    40 Coleman, J. S, "Foundation of social theory" Cambridge 1990

    41 Bartels, L, "Economic inequality and political representation. Paper for the Russell Sage Foundation Project on the Social Dimensions of Inequality" Princeton University 2003

    42 Knack, S, "Does social capital have an economic payoff? Across-country investigation" 112 : 1251-1288, 1997

    43 Uslaner, E. M, "Civic engagement and particularized trust: The ties that bind people to their ethnic communities" 31 (31): 331-360, 2003

    44 Williamson, O. E, "Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization" 36 (36): 453-486, 1993

    45 Putnam, R. D, "Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community" Simon and Schuster 2000

    46 Stolle, D, "Are all associations alike?: Member diversity, associational type and the creation of social capital" 42 : 47-65, 1998

    47 Cohen, J, "Applied multiple regression and correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences" Lawrence Erlbaum 1975

    48 Tajfel, H, "An integrative theory of intergroup conflict, In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations" Monterey 33-47, 1979

    49 Brady, H. E, "An analytical perspective on participatory inequality and income inequality" University of California 2003

    50 Deininger, K, "A new data set: Measuring economic income inequality" 10 : 565-592, 1996

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.77 1.77 1.73
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.82 1.86 2.025 0.21
    더보기
    해외이동버튼