RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      사회과 교사의 수업 전문성 제고를 위한 멘토링 체제 개발 = The Development of a Mentoring System for Enhancing Social Studies Teachers` Teaching Professionalism

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76552591

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The objective of this study was to develop a well-structured mentoring system in consideration of the procedure and elements of mentoring (aspect of procedure), the roles and qualities of mentors and mentees (aspect of agents), and mentoring process evaluation and feedback (aspect of evaluation). The contents of this study are summarized as follows. First, before developing a mentoring system, we discussed the necessity and meaning of class mentoring focused on the relation between teaching professionalism and pedagogical content knowledge(PCK) and the relation between mentoring and reflective practice. That is, it is necessary to design a professionalism development program focused on PCK, the key of curriculum teaching professionalism, and such a program is meaningful in that mentoring can stimulate the formation and development of PCK through reflective practice. Second, we developed a class mentoring system for enhancing teaching professionalism. For this, first we suggested the theoretical principles of class mentoring based on the experiential learning theory. That is, based on the experiential learning theory emphasizing the cyclic learning process of `experience→reflect on experiences→draw conclusions and find alternatives→plan the next stage,` we designed a cyclic class mentoring process of `execute a class→reflect on the class→derive implications and theories for improving the class→plan an improved class.` Then, in the aspect of mentoring agents, we suggested mentors` qualities (teaching ability, mentoring abilities such as class analysis ability, interaction ability, alternative suggestion ability, etc.) and mentees` qualities (attitude of receiving mentoring opinions, will and attitude of practice for improvement, etc.), and in the aspect of mentoring evaluation, we suggested evaluation of mentoring process and feedback by external specialists and teachers participating in mentoring. Next, based on political implications of the class mentoring system developed in this study, policies were suggested in connection to teacher ability development and evaluation as follows. First, in connection to teacher ability development and evaluation to be enforced from 2010, we suggest the introduction of the one-to-one customized class mentoring system proposed in this study as an alternative for advanced training of low-score areas in the results of assessment by the government. Second, in case the mentoring system proposed in this study is operated in connection to the above-mentioned teacher ability development and evaluation, it is appropriate for demonstrative operation of `education first evaluation second,` so we suggest the use of the program as an education program in preparation for evaluation. Lastly, a number of suggestions were made as follows with regard to the limitations of the developed class mentoring system, tasks for the settlement of the class mentoring system, and tasks for the activation of class mentoring. First, this study developed a class mentoring system as a preliminary model applicable to social studies, and the model needs to be refined through further research into a social studies class mentoring program with `curricular validity` and `field relevance.` Second, for the successful settlement of the mentoring system proposed in this study, self-reflective and open teacher culture should be settled. Third, because the key factor determining the success of monitoring is the mentoring teacher, we need to develop mentoring teacher training programs and provide governmental supports for such programs. Fourth, for the activation of mentoring operation, various administrative and financial supports are required for mentor and mentee teachers` mentoring activities.
      번역하기

      The objective of this study was to develop a well-structured mentoring system in consideration of the procedure and elements of mentoring (aspect of procedure), the roles and qualities of mentors and mentees (aspect of agents), and mentoring process e...

      The objective of this study was to develop a well-structured mentoring system in consideration of the procedure and elements of mentoring (aspect of procedure), the roles and qualities of mentors and mentees (aspect of agents), and mentoring process evaluation and feedback (aspect of evaluation). The contents of this study are summarized as follows. First, before developing a mentoring system, we discussed the necessity and meaning of class mentoring focused on the relation between teaching professionalism and pedagogical content knowledge(PCK) and the relation between mentoring and reflective practice. That is, it is necessary to design a professionalism development program focused on PCK, the key of curriculum teaching professionalism, and such a program is meaningful in that mentoring can stimulate the formation and development of PCK through reflective practice. Second, we developed a class mentoring system for enhancing teaching professionalism. For this, first we suggested the theoretical principles of class mentoring based on the experiential learning theory. That is, based on the experiential learning theory emphasizing the cyclic learning process of `experience→reflect on experiences→draw conclusions and find alternatives→plan the next stage,` we designed a cyclic class mentoring process of `execute a class→reflect on the class→derive implications and theories for improving the class→plan an improved class.` Then, in the aspect of mentoring agents, we suggested mentors` qualities (teaching ability, mentoring abilities such as class analysis ability, interaction ability, alternative suggestion ability, etc.) and mentees` qualities (attitude of receiving mentoring opinions, will and attitude of practice for improvement, etc.), and in the aspect of mentoring evaluation, we suggested evaluation of mentoring process and feedback by external specialists and teachers participating in mentoring. Next, based on political implications of the class mentoring system developed in this study, policies were suggested in connection to teacher ability development and evaluation as follows. First, in connection to teacher ability development and evaluation to be enforced from 2010, we suggest the introduction of the one-to-one customized class mentoring system proposed in this study as an alternative for advanced training of low-score areas in the results of assessment by the government. Second, in case the mentoring system proposed in this study is operated in connection to the above-mentioned teacher ability development and evaluation, it is appropriate for demonstrative operation of `education first evaluation second,` so we suggest the use of the program as an education program in preparation for evaluation. Lastly, a number of suggestions were made as follows with regard to the limitations of the developed class mentoring system, tasks for the settlement of the class mentoring system, and tasks for the activation of class mentoring. First, this study developed a class mentoring system as a preliminary model applicable to social studies, and the model needs to be refined through further research into a social studies class mentoring program with `curricular validity` and `field relevance.` Second, for the successful settlement of the mentoring system proposed in this study, self-reflective and open teacher culture should be settled. Third, because the key factor determining the success of monitoring is the mentoring teacher, we need to develop mentoring teacher training programs and provide governmental supports for such programs. Fourth, for the activation of mentoring operation, various administrative and financial supports are required for mentor and mentee teachers` mentoring activities.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 강순미, "초임 유아교사의 멘토링 경험과 언어적 상호작용 유형간의 관계 분석" 7 (7): 91-108, 2007

      2 이영국, "초등체육에서 반성적 멘토링 모형의 실천 가능성 탐색" 한국스포츠교육학회 14 (14): 155-172, 2007

      3 경기도교육청, "좋은 수업 나눔 교과교육 멘토링제 워크숍 자료집"

      4 백유순, "유아특수교육교사 양성대학 「현장실습」과목의 효율적 운영을 위한 멘토링 모형 개발 연구" 한국유아특수교육학회 5 (5): 48-87, 2005

      5 조형숙, "유아교사를 위한 집단 멘토링의 의미탐색" 미래유아교육학회 12 (12): 227-263, 2005

      6 신붕섭, "신규교사 멘토링의 운영 실제와 개선 방안" 한국교원교육학회 23 (23): 263-289, 2006

      7 임찬빈, "수업평가 기준 개발 연구(Ⅰ): 일반 기준 및 교과(사회, 과학, 영어) 기준 개발" 한국교육과정평가원 2004

      8 차경수, "사회과 교육" 동문사 2008

      9 이종일, "반성적 실행을 통한 전문가로서의 교사자질 개선" 한국사회과교육연구학회 42 (42): 5-27, 2003

      10 장경숙, "멘토링을 통한 초임교사 영어수업능력 신장: 스토리텔링을 중심으로" 한국초등영어교육학회 13 (13): 65-96, 2007

      1 강순미, "초임 유아교사의 멘토링 경험과 언어적 상호작용 유형간의 관계 분석" 7 (7): 91-108, 2007

      2 이영국, "초등체육에서 반성적 멘토링 모형의 실천 가능성 탐색" 한국스포츠교육학회 14 (14): 155-172, 2007

      3 경기도교육청, "좋은 수업 나눔 교과교육 멘토링제 워크숍 자료집"

      4 백유순, "유아특수교육교사 양성대학 「현장실습」과목의 효율적 운영을 위한 멘토링 모형 개발 연구" 한국유아특수교육학회 5 (5): 48-87, 2005

      5 조형숙, "유아교사를 위한 집단 멘토링의 의미탐색" 미래유아교육학회 12 (12): 227-263, 2005

      6 신붕섭, "신규교사 멘토링의 운영 실제와 개선 방안" 한국교원교육학회 23 (23): 263-289, 2006

      7 임찬빈, "수업평가 기준 개발 연구(Ⅰ): 일반 기준 및 교과(사회, 과학, 영어) 기준 개발" 한국교육과정평가원 2004

      8 차경수, "사회과 교육" 동문사 2008

      9 이종일, "반성적 실행을 통한 전문가로서의 교사자질 개선" 한국사회과교육연구학회 42 (42): 5-27, 2003

      10 장경숙, "멘토링을 통한 초임교사 영어수업능력 신장: 스토리텔링을 중심으로" 한국초등영어교육학회 13 (13): 65-96, 2007

      11 강대현, "교육과정 개정에 따른 사회과 내용 교수 지식(PCK) 연구" 한국교육과정평가원 2007

      12 교육과학기술부, "교원능력개발평가와 연계한 맞춤형 연수 추진 방안"

      13 최승현, "교과별 내용교수지식(PCK) 연구(Ⅱ) - 중등 초임교사 수업컨설팅을 중심으로" 한국교육과정평가원 2008

      14 Shulman,L.S., "Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching" 15 (15): 4-14, 1986

      15 Beard, C., "The power of experiential learning" Saxon Graphics 2002

      16 Daresh,J.C., "Teachers mentoring teachers: A practical approach to helping new and experienced staff" Corwin Press, Inc 2003

      17 Rosemary, P. L., "Methods and techniques for engaging learning in experiential learning in Experiential learning: A new approach" Jossey-Bass Publishers 29-42, 1994

      18 Shulman, J. H., "Mentoring teachers toward excellence: Supporting and developing highly qualified teachers" Jossey-Bass 2006

      19 Cunningham,B., "Mentoring teachers in post compulsory education: A guide to effective practice" David Fulton Publishers 2005

      20 Villani,S., "Mentoring programs for new teachers: Models of induction and support" Corwin Press, Inc 2002

      21 Portner,H., "Mentoring new teachers" Corwin Press 2008

      22 Korthagen, F., "Learning from practice in Linking practice. and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc 32-50, 2001

      23 Shulman,L.S., "Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform" 57 : 1-22, 1987

      24 Kolb,D.A., "Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development" Prentice-Hall, Inc 1984

      25 Jamieson,I., "Experiential learning in the context of teacher education in Action and reflection in teacher education" Ablex Publishing Corporation 35-54, 1994

      26 Dewey,J., "Experience and education" Macmillan Publishing Company 1938

      27 Borko, H., "Expanding a teacher's knowledge base: A cognitive psychological perspective on professional development in Professional development in education: New paradigms & Practices" Teachers College Press 35-65, 1995

      28 Schön, D. A., "Educating the reflective practitioner" John Wiley & Sons, Inc 1987

      29 Jonson,K.F., "Being an effective mentor: How to help beginning teachers succeed" Corwin Press 2008

      30 Reagan, T. G., "Becoming a reflective educator" Corwin Press, Inc 2000

      31 대구광역시교육청, "2009학년도 중등 신규 임용교사 멘토링 제도 추진 계획"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-06-28 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Association of Social Education KCI등재
      2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.5 1.5 1.5
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.4 1.35 1.812 0.28
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼