RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국어 교실 교사-학습자 간 대화에 나타난 교사 중심적 의사소통 양상

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76485064

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Jin, Jae-Hee. 2004. Aspects of Teacher-centered Communication in Conversations between Teachers and Learners in the Korean Language Classroom. Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea, 12(2). This paper examines how and why asymmetrical relationships are constituted through verbal interactions between teachers and students in the Korean language classroom. According to van Dijk (1989), 'power' in institutions such as hospitals or classrooms is best conceptualized as ‘group power asymmetrical relations’ between groups. As is the case for institutional members, members of dominant groups may derive their individually exercised power from the overall power of the group to which they belong. Speakers often possess an institutional role and their conversations are backed by the power or authority of the institution. From this perspective, this paper examines how power is being exerted and assigned in conversations between teachers and students in the Korean classroom.
    First, this research examined if the turns at talk for the participants (teacher and students) were equally distributed. The results showed that the teacher took about 50% of the total turns at talk, which is about eight times as many turns taken by each student. This indicates that the flow of classroom conversation starts from the teacher, or in other words, is teacher-centered communication. Second, this research considered inequality that occurs during problem solving meaning negotiation. Research results also showed that in 165 negotiated exchanges, over 85% were initiated by the teacher, which underscores the extremely asymmetrical instigation of conversation in Korean language classrooms. Student deficiencies in fluency and initiation, teacher questioning methodology and dialogue guidance, the teacher's almost exclusive right to choose the topic, the excessive adaptation of students to the classroom environment as well as the nationality of students were all factors contributing to this phenomenon.
    번역하기

    Jin, Jae-Hee. 2004. Aspects of Teacher-centered Communication in Conversations between Teachers and Learners in the Korean Language Classroom. Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea, 12(2). This paper examines how and why asymmetrical relationships are cons...

    Jin, Jae-Hee. 2004. Aspects of Teacher-centered Communication in Conversations between Teachers and Learners in the Korean Language Classroom. Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea, 12(2). This paper examines how and why asymmetrical relationships are constituted through verbal interactions between teachers and students in the Korean language classroom. According to van Dijk (1989), 'power' in institutions such as hospitals or classrooms is best conceptualized as ‘group power asymmetrical relations’ between groups. As is the case for institutional members, members of dominant groups may derive their individually exercised power from the overall power of the group to which they belong. Speakers often possess an institutional role and their conversations are backed by the power or authority of the institution. From this perspective, this paper examines how power is being exerted and assigned in conversations between teachers and students in the Korean classroom.
    First, this research examined if the turns at talk for the participants (teacher and students) were equally distributed. The results showed that the teacher took about 50% of the total turns at talk, which is about eight times as many turns taken by each student. This indicates that the flow of classroom conversation starts from the teacher, or in other words, is teacher-centered communication. Second, this research considered inequality that occurs during problem solving meaning negotiation. Research results also showed that in 165 negotiated exchanges, over 85% were initiated by the teacher, which underscores the extremely asymmetrical instigation of conversation in Korean language classrooms. Student deficiencies in fluency and initiation, teacher questioning methodology and dialogue guidance, the teacher's almost exclusive right to choose the topic, the excessive adaptation of students to the classroom environment as well as the nationality of students were all factors contributing to this phenomenon.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "한국어 교실 구두 상호작용에 나타난 문제 해결을 위한 의미 협상: 교사-학습자 대화를 중심으로" 2004

    2 "교실 상호작용에서 나타난 교사의 역할: 스캐폴딩 교수를 중심으로" 국제한국어교육학회 13 (13): 243-264, 2002

    3 "negotiation and age difference in second language acquisition" 409-438, 1981

    4 Oxford, "Towards an Analysis of Discourse" Sinclair Oxford University Press 1975

    5 "The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom" 7 : 183-213, 1978

    6 "The development of pragmatic competence by Japanese learners of English" 131-55, 1987

    7 "Structure of discourse and structure of power" 198918-59

    8 "Some universals in language usage Some Universal in Language Usage" Cambridge University Press 321-335, 1987

    9 "Research on negotiation What does it reveal about second- language learning conditions" 493-527, 1994

    10 "Research on Teaching and Learning" Cambridge University Press 1988

    1 "한국어 교실 구두 상호작용에 나타난 문제 해결을 위한 의미 협상: 교사-학습자 대화를 중심으로" 2004

    2 "교실 상호작용에서 나타난 교사의 역할: 스캐폴딩 교수를 중심으로" 국제한국어교육학회 13 (13): 243-264, 2002

    3 "negotiation and age difference in second language acquisition" 409-438, 1981

    4 Oxford, "Towards an Analysis of Discourse" Sinclair Oxford University Press 1975

    5 "The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom" 7 : 183-213, 1978

    6 "The development of pragmatic competence by Japanese learners of English" 131-55, 1987

    7 "Structure of discourse and structure of power" 198918-59

    8 "Some universals in language usage Some Universal in Language Usage" Cambridge University Press 321-335, 1987

    9 "Research on negotiation What does it reveal about second- language learning conditions" 493-527, 1994

    10 "Research on Teaching and Learning" Cambridge University Press 1988

    11 "Negotiating meaning in institutional and informal conversations with non-native speakers Intercultural Communication Proceedings of the 17th International LAUD Symposium Duisburg 23-27 March 1992" 159-184, 1994

    12 "Methodological issues in interlanguage studies" Edinburgh University Press 253-279, 1984

    13 "Learner interaction in the classroom and its effect on language acquisition Classroom Oriented Research in Second Language Acquisition" 246-267, 1983

    14 "Analyzing talk at work Talk at Work Interaction in Institutional Settings" Cambridge University Press 1-65, 1992

    15 "A reconsideration of the Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis" Blackwell Publishers 138-163, 1991

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2012-06-04 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Linguistic Journal of Korea -> The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.46 0.46 0.5
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.56 0.51 0.724 0.17
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼