RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      연금개혁의 정치: 서구 3개국 사례를 통해 본 구조적 개혁의 정치적 조건들 = The Politics of Pension Reform: Political Conditions for Structural Pension Reform in the Three West European Countries

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45031590

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper explores the political conditions for structural pension reform focussing on the experiences of the three west European countries, namely, the UK, Sweden, and Italy. In the UK, a structural pension reform was introduced by the government`s unilateral imposition, while Sweden achieved a fundamental transformation of the pension scheme by building a broad policy-oriented coalition among political parties, and Italy, by a government- trade union consensus. Regardless of these different political expressions of social consensus, the most important factor determining the success or failure of pension reform seems to be power relations among the social actors involved in pension reform. In other words, the experiences of the three countries show that the pension reform can be achieved when the social actors defending existing pension system are divided and weak, and thus welfare coalition for the pension system is broken down. This implies that, contrary to the new institutionalist arguments, the power resource and power relations among the class-based social actors are still important in the welfare politics in the mature welfare states.
      번역하기

      This paper explores the political conditions for structural pension reform focussing on the experiences of the three west European countries, namely, the UK, Sweden, and Italy. In the UK, a structural pension reform was introduced by the government`s ...

      This paper explores the political conditions for structural pension reform focussing on the experiences of the three west European countries, namely, the UK, Sweden, and Italy. In the UK, a structural pension reform was introduced by the government`s unilateral imposition, while Sweden achieved a fundamental transformation of the pension scheme by building a broad policy-oriented coalition among political parties, and Italy, by a government- trade union consensus. Regardless of these different political expressions of social consensus, the most important factor determining the success or failure of pension reform seems to be power relations among the social actors involved in pension reform. In other words, the experiences of the three countries show that the pension reform can be achieved when the social actors defending existing pension system are divided and weak, and thus welfare coalition for the pension system is broken down. This implies that, contrary to the new institutionalist arguments, the power resource and power relations among the class-based social actors are still important in the welfare politics in the mature welfare states.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼