RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    아동ㆍ청소년이용음란물의 단순소지자에 대한 규제의 현상과 방향성

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The production and sale, and to a slightly lesser degree the possession, of child pornography, which is the visual representation of minors engaged in sexual activity or engaging in lewd or erotic behavior designed to arouse the viewer’s sexual interest, is illegal in most countries. In South Korea, the Protection of Children and Adolescents Against Sexual Exploitation Act criminalizes the producing, importing, exporting, selling, distributing, offering, disseminating and possessing of pornography involving children and adolescents. So, under the conditions as prescribed by the Act, attempting to gain access to such pornographic materials is not punishable, but(simple) possession of such pornographic materials is illegal if it is for the purpose of selling, renting, or distributing it for profit.
    Few would disagree that the government has a compelling interest in protecting minors from sexual abuse and exploitation, which is also the main reason for defining and criminalizing child pornography. In this regard, forms of child pornography offences,(simple) possession of child pornography in particular, have to be designed and implemented more precisely and goal-oriented as well. Laws addressing the(simple) possession of child pornography vary from country to country. Some countries have restrictions on the criminalization of(simple) possession of child pornography; the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the provisions prohibiting virtual depictions of child pornography went too far by trying to ban speech that created no real minor victims of sexual abuse.
    The United Nations Optional Protocol on the Rights of the Child states that all signatories shall take appropriate measures to prevent the exploitative use of children in pornographic performances and materials. Both the Council of Europe’s Cybercrime Convention and the EU Framework Decision require member states to criminalize all aspects of child pornography. There is a growing international consensus on the risks to children from child pornography, but such a consensus is based on the concept that the use of children in the production or distribution of pornographic materials or performances must be prohibited. In that sense, the(simple) possession of child pornography can be appropriately classified as criminal conduct. Nonetheless, how it is treated thereafter is of concern, and also requires a careful discussion.
    번역하기

    The production and sale, and to a slightly lesser degree the possession, of child pornography, which is the visual representation of minors engaged in sexual activity or engaging in lewd or erotic behavior designed to arouse the viewer’s sexual inte...

    The production and sale, and to a slightly lesser degree the possession, of child pornography, which is the visual representation of minors engaged in sexual activity or engaging in lewd or erotic behavior designed to arouse the viewer’s sexual interest, is illegal in most countries. In South Korea, the Protection of Children and Adolescents Against Sexual Exploitation Act criminalizes the producing, importing, exporting, selling, distributing, offering, disseminating and possessing of pornography involving children and adolescents. So, under the conditions as prescribed by the Act, attempting to gain access to such pornographic materials is not punishable, but(simple) possession of such pornographic materials is illegal if it is for the purpose of selling, renting, or distributing it for profit.
    Few would disagree that the government has a compelling interest in protecting minors from sexual abuse and exploitation, which is also the main reason for defining and criminalizing child pornography. In this regard, forms of child pornography offences,(simple) possession of child pornography in particular, have to be designed and implemented more precisely and goal-oriented as well. Laws addressing the(simple) possession of child pornography vary from country to country. Some countries have restrictions on the criminalization of(simple) possession of child pornography; the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the provisions prohibiting virtual depictions of child pornography went too far by trying to ban speech that created no real minor victims of sexual abuse.
    The United Nations Optional Protocol on the Rights of the Child states that all signatories shall take appropriate measures to prevent the exploitative use of children in pornographic performances and materials. Both the Council of Europe’s Cybercrime Convention and the EU Framework Decision require member states to criminalize all aspects of child pornography. There is a growing international consensus on the risks to children from child pornography, but such a consensus is based on the concept that the use of children in the production or distribution of pornographic materials or performances must be prohibited. In that sense, the(simple) possession of child pornography can be appropriately classified as criminal conduct. Nonetheless, how it is treated thereafter is of concern, and also requires a careful discussion.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김미숙, "아동청소년 성착취 근절을 위한 국내외 이행실태 연구" 보건복지가족부ㆍ한국보건사회연구원 2009

    2 경찰청, "아동음란물 단속 관련 설명자료"

    3 한석현, "성범죄 처벌법규의 체계적 정비방안" 국회입법조사처 2011

    4 加藤隆之, "性表現規制の限界-「わいせつ」概念とその規制根拠"

    5 Endrass, Jérôme, "The consumption of Internet child pornography and violent and sex offending" 43-50, 2009

    6 Burke, Debra D, "The Criminalization of Virtual Child Pornography: A Constitutional Question" 439-472, 1997

    7 Wortley, Richard, "Situational Prevention Of Child Sexual Abuse: Crime Prevention Studies Vol.19" Crime Prevention Studies 2006

    8 U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary, "Sex Crimes and the Internet, Hearing before the Committee on the Judiciary House of Representatives" 2007

    9 European Commission, "Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on combating the sexual abuse, sexual exploitation of children and child pornography, repealing Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA"

    10 Altenhain, Karsten, "Kriterien der Scheinminderjährigkeit im Rahmen des Stafverbots der Jugendpornographie"

    1 김미숙, "아동청소년 성착취 근절을 위한 국내외 이행실태 연구" 보건복지가족부ㆍ한국보건사회연구원 2009

    2 경찰청, "아동음란물 단속 관련 설명자료"

    3 한석현, "성범죄 처벌법규의 체계적 정비방안" 국회입법조사처 2011

    4 加藤隆之, "性表現規制の限界-「わいせつ」概念とその規制根拠"

    5 Endrass, Jérôme, "The consumption of Internet child pornography and violent and sex offending" 43-50, 2009

    6 Burke, Debra D, "The Criminalization of Virtual Child Pornography: A Constitutional Question" 439-472, 1997

    7 Wortley, Richard, "Situational Prevention Of Child Sexual Abuse: Crime Prevention Studies Vol.19" Crime Prevention Studies 2006

    8 U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary, "Sex Crimes and the Internet, Hearing before the Committee on the Judiciary House of Representatives" 2007

    9 European Commission, "Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on combating the sexual abuse, sexual exploitation of children and child pornography, repealing Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA"

    10 Altenhain, Karsten, "Kriterien der Scheinminderjährigkeit im Rahmen des Stafverbots der Jugendpornographie"

    11 Deutscher Bundestag, "Drucksache 16/9646"

    12 Finkelhor, David, "Current Information on the Scope and Nature of Child Sexual Abuse" 31-53, 1994

    13 대검찰청, "2012년 9월 24일자 보도자료(검찰, 아동ㆍ청소년 음란물 유통 근절을 위해 엄중처벌로 강력 대처)"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-05-18 학술지등록 한글명 : 미국헌법연구
    외국어명 : Study on The American Constitution
    KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.68 0.68 0.68
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.73 0.72 0.798 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼