RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    개인정보의 개념에 대한 논의와 법적 과제

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100291100

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    “Personal data” is a central concept in privacy regulation. This term defines the scope and boundaries of many privacy statutes and regulations. However, since the concept of personal data is too wide and uncertain, it is inconvenient to apply and enforce the laws. Therefore, in this Essay, after looking at the approach ways to the concept of personal information in the United States and EU, I try to suggest future legal challenges that reflect the characteristics of the legal concept of personal information
    The reason why personal data is more important as Legal concept is due to the development of information processing technology. Because of the abuse of personal data collected, personal or property damage was caused to the data subject. In addition, personal information is currently business asset indispensable in order to conduct business associated with the Internet and somtimes should be
    opened to the public in order to ensure the freedom of expression.
    In the United States, the law provides multiple explanations of this term. so that increases the regulatory maze and associated compliance costs for regulated entities, and as a consequence of the multiple possibilities flowing from the three classifications of personal data, the same information may or may not be personal data under different statutes and in different processing contexts. In contrast, in the European Union, there is a single definition, and one that defines personal information broadly to encompass all information that is identifiable to a person, so the EU’s definition of personal information risks sweeping too broadly.
    The Personal Data Protection Act of Korea adopts the way of EU defining the concept of personal data but since special laws regulating personal credit information, medical information, educational information, etc. are applied to the related cases in the first, it can be said that the third method of the United States is also taken as part of a combination. Therefore it can be appeared combination of defects in the United States and EU law in Korea.
    To make privacy law effective for the future, with regard to legislation on personal data, factors to consider are as follows: First specific guidelines should be provided to determine whether or not a certain information is personal information. Secondly it is desirable that the use on proprietary value of personal information is regulated by self-regulation between the parties. Finally lower level of regulation should be applied to the simple personal information that is not a file or database.
    번역하기

    “Personal data” is a central concept in privacy regulation. This term defines the scope and boundaries of many privacy statutes and regulations. However, since the concept of personal data is too wide and uncertain, it is inconvenient to apply and...

    “Personal data” is a central concept in privacy regulation. This term defines the scope and boundaries of many privacy statutes and regulations. However, since the concept of personal data is too wide and uncertain, it is inconvenient to apply and enforce the laws. Therefore, in this Essay, after looking at the approach ways to the concept of personal information in the United States and EU, I try to suggest future legal challenges that reflect the characteristics of the legal concept of personal information
    The reason why personal data is more important as Legal concept is due to the development of information processing technology. Because of the abuse of personal data collected, personal or property damage was caused to the data subject. In addition, personal information is currently business asset indispensable in order to conduct business associated with the Internet and somtimes should be
    opened to the public in order to ensure the freedom of expression.
    In the United States, the law provides multiple explanations of this term. so that increases the regulatory maze and associated compliance costs for regulated entities, and as a consequence of the multiple possibilities flowing from the three classifications of personal data, the same information may or may not be personal data under different statutes and in different processing contexts. In contrast, in the European Union, there is a single definition, and one that defines personal information broadly to encompass all information that is identifiable to a person, so the EU’s definition of personal information risks sweeping too broadly.
    The Personal Data Protection Act of Korea adopts the way of EU defining the concept of personal data but since special laws regulating personal credit information, medical information, educational information, etc. are applied to the related cases in the first, it can be said that the third method of the United States is also taken as part of a combination. Therefore it can be appeared combination of defects in the United States and EU law in Korea.
    To make privacy law effective for the future, with regard to legislation on personal data, factors to consider are as follows: First specific guidelines should be provided to determine whether or not a certain information is personal information. Secondly it is desirable that the use on proprietary value of personal information is regulated by self-regulation between the parties. Finally lower level of regulation should be applied to the simple personal information that is not a file or database.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 문재완, "프라이버시보호를 목적으로 하는 인터넷규제의 의의와 한계: ‘잊혀질 권리’ 논의를 중심으로" 2011

    2 문재완, "프라이버시 보호 : 신화에서 규범으로" 2013

    3 이인호, "정보프라이버시권: 한국에서의 도전과 응전" 2012

    4 박경신, "사생활의 비밀의 절차적 보호규범으로서의 개인정보보호법리 ― 개인정보보호법 및 위치정보보호법의 해석 및 적용의 헌법적 한계 ―" 한국공법학회 40 (40): 129-162, 2011

    5 최경진, "빅데이터와 개인정보" 법학연구소 25 (25): 197-218, 2013

    6 성준호, "빅데이터 환경에서 개인정보보호에 관한 법적 검토" 법학연구소 21 (21): 307-333, 2013

    7 김민호, "민간영역에서 개인정보의 처리와 이용에 관한 비교법적 고찰" 한국토지공법학회 46 : 291-318, 2009

    8 김민호, "공공부문 개인정보보호법제의 현황과 과제" 한국토지공법학회 37 (37): 207-224, 2007

    9 전경근, "개인정보의 활용범위에 관한 고찰" 법학연구소 6 (6): 479-502, 2012

    10 장주봉, "개인정보의 의미와 보호범위" 서울대학교 3 : 2012

    1 문재완, "프라이버시보호를 목적으로 하는 인터넷규제의 의의와 한계: ‘잊혀질 권리’ 논의를 중심으로" 2011

    2 문재완, "프라이버시 보호 : 신화에서 규범으로" 2013

    3 이인호, "정보프라이버시권: 한국에서의 도전과 응전" 2012

    4 박경신, "사생활의 비밀의 절차적 보호규범으로서의 개인정보보호법리 ― 개인정보보호법 및 위치정보보호법의 해석 및 적용의 헌법적 한계 ―" 한국공법학회 40 (40): 129-162, 2011

    5 최경진, "빅데이터와 개인정보" 법학연구소 25 (25): 197-218, 2013

    6 성준호, "빅데이터 환경에서 개인정보보호에 관한 법적 검토" 법학연구소 21 (21): 307-333, 2013

    7 김민호, "민간영역에서 개인정보의 처리와 이용에 관한 비교법적 고찰" 한국토지공법학회 46 : 291-318, 2009

    8 김민호, "공공부문 개인정보보호법제의 현황과 과제" 한국토지공법학회 37 (37): 207-224, 2007

    9 전경근, "개인정보의 활용범위에 관한 고찰" 법학연구소 6 (6): 479-502, 2012

    10 장주봉, "개인정보의 의미와 보호범위" 서울대학교 3 : 2012

    11 정상조, "개인정보의 보호와 민사적 구제수단" 법조협회 58 (58): 5-73, 2009

    12 임규철, "개인정보의 보호범위" (17) : 2012

    13 문재완, "개인정보의 개념에 관한 연구" 한국공법학회 42 (42): 53-77, 2014

    14 이창범, "개인정보보호법" 법문사 2012

    15 이민영, "개인정보법제론, 개정증보판" jinhan M&B 2007

    16 함인선, "개인정보 처리와 관련한 법적 문제 - 우리나라 「개인정보 보호법」과 EU의 ‘2012년 규칙안’을 중심으로 하여 -" 법학연구소 6 (6): 150-171, 2013

    17 황성기, "개인정보 보호와 다른 헌법적 가치의 조화" 법학연구소 5 (5): 20-36, 2012

    18 문재완, "개인정보 보호법제의 헌법적 고찰" 세계헌법학회한국학회 19 (19): 271-296, 2013

    19 구태언, "개인정보 보호법의 제문제" 서울대학교 3 : 2012

    20 행정안전부, "개인정보 보호법령 및 지침 고시 해설"

    21 박경신, "“개인정보”의 정의와 위치정보보호법의 개선 방안 - 익명위치정보, 허가제 및 즉시동의요건을 중심으로 -" 부설법학연구소 37 : 191-221, 2012

    22 Paul M. Schwartz, "The PII Problem: Privacy and a New Concept of Personally Identifiable Information" 86 : 1814-, 2011

    23 Paul M. Schwartz, "Reconciling Personal Information in the United States and European Union" 102 : 2014

    24 FTC, "Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations For Businesses and Policymakers" 2012

    25 "European Commission, Proposal f or a R egu lation o f the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation)"

    26 "Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data"

    27 Paul M. Schwartz, "BEYOND LESSIG'S CODE FOR INTERNET PRIVACY: CYBERSPACE FILTERS, PRIVACY-CONTROL, AND FAIR INFORMATION PRACTICES" 743-, 2000

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-05-18 학술지등록 한글명 : 미국헌법연구
    외국어명 : Study on The American Constitution
    KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.68 0.68 0.68
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.73 0.72 0.798 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼