RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    후기 실증주의와 질적 연구방법의 정책분석평가연구에의 적용가능성

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106043931

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Positivism and rationalism in public policy science have greatly affected on public policy analysis and evaluation theories and practices. However, positivistic philosophy, logic and methods utilizing quantitative research methods have their own strengths and limitations. Behaviorism rooted in positivism had functioned as fetters to the full development of policy science. The development of value-oriented policy science may be much attributed to the rise of post-positivism since 1960s. The study of policy science for the last half-century, however, has been ironically focused on the positivistic approaches and showed limited achievements in its development. Qualities of policy informations and policy recommendations produced by policy experts seem to have been unsatisfactory even in advanced western countries. The reason for these phenomena might be attributed to the under-utilization of qualitative research methods based on post-positivism.This paper deals with the characteristics and strengths of post-positivistic approach and qualitative research methods. This paper discusses also the applicability of post-positivism and qualitative research methods to the study of policy science. The author concludes with recommendations for overcoming the paradoxical phenomena in the field.
    번역하기

    Positivism and rationalism in public policy science have greatly affected on public policy analysis and evaluation theories and practices. However, positivistic philosophy, logic and methods utilizing quantitative research methods have their own stren...

    Positivism and rationalism in public policy science have greatly affected on public policy analysis and evaluation theories and practices. However, positivistic philosophy, logic and methods utilizing quantitative research methods have their own strengths and limitations. Behaviorism rooted in positivism had functioned as fetters to the full development of policy science. The development of value-oriented policy science may be much attributed to the rise of post-positivism since 1960s. The study of policy science for the last half-century, however, has been ironically focused on the positivistic approaches and showed limited achievements in its development. Qualities of policy informations and policy recommendations produced by policy experts seem to have been unsatisfactory even in advanced western countries. The reason for these phenomena might be attributed to the under-utilization of qualitative research methods based on post-positivism.This paper deals with the characteristics and strengths of post-positivistic approach and qualitative research methods. This paper discusses also the applicability of post-positivism and qualitative research methods to the study of policy science. The author concludes with recommendations for overcoming the paradoxical phenomena in the field.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이병철, "포스트모더니즘이 현대행정학에 주는 함의" 8 (8): 229-253, 1998

    2 이지만, "탈(脫)실증주의 사회과학 방법론의 고찰" 경영연구소 41 (41): 285-309, 2004

    3 신경림, "질적연구방법의 철학적 배경" 6 (6): 174-192, 1994

    4 조흥식, "질적 연구방법론: 다섯 가지 전통" 학지사 2007

    5 박병식, "조사방법론" 시대고시기획 2003

    6 김명수, "정책평가에 대한 실증주의적 접근의 유용성: 효과평가를 중심으로" 18 (18): 13-41, 2008

    7 정주택, "정책평가론" 법문사 2007

    8 이성우, "정책분석의 패러다임과 연구방법에 대한 메타적 접근" 14 (14): 2004

    9 이성우, "정책분석론: 이론과 기법" 조명문화사 2008

    10 노화준, "정책분석론" 박영사 2002

    1 이병철, "포스트모더니즘이 현대행정학에 주는 함의" 8 (8): 229-253, 1998

    2 이지만, "탈(脫)실증주의 사회과학 방법론의 고찰" 경영연구소 41 (41): 285-309, 2004

    3 신경림, "질적연구방법의 철학적 배경" 6 (6): 174-192, 1994

    4 조흥식, "질적 연구방법론: 다섯 가지 전통" 학지사 2007

    5 박병식, "조사방법론" 시대고시기획 2003

    6 김명수, "정책평가에 대한 실증주의적 접근의 유용성: 효과평가를 중심으로" 18 (18): 13-41, 2008

    7 정주택, "정책평가론" 법문사 2007

    8 이성우, "정책분석의 패러다임과 연구방법에 대한 메타적 접근" 14 (14): 2004

    9 이성우, "정책분석론: 이론과 기법" 조명문화사 2008

    10 노화준, "정책분석론" 박영사 2002

    11 송근원, "정책분석 및 평가와 실증주의: 절반의 실패" 18 (18): 43-74, 2008

    12 오철호, "머리말: 정책분석평가연구와 실증주의 논쟁의 재인식" 18 (18): 1-12, 2008

    13 김명수, "공공정책평가론" 박영사 2003

    14 Ryu Yoshiaki, "政策評價の 理論と技法" 多賀 出版 2000

    15 송근원, "政策分析 및 評價에 대한 接近方法의 變遷-實證主義에 대한 代案의 探索" 1 (1): 1-18, 1991

    16 金光雄, "後期行態主義論" 13 (13): 110-127, 1975

    17 朴埈成, "實證主義的 社會科學의 論理와 그 批判" 12 (12): 395-406, 1984

    18 金容福, "實證主義的 社會科學方法論에 대한 反省的 論議" 11 : 169-178, 1982

    19 Wolf, Amanda., "“Building Advice: The Craft of the Policy Professional”, Working Paper, No. 7. http://www.ssc.govt.nz/display/document.asp?docid=2804"

    20 Weiss, C. H., "Toward the Future of Stakeholder Approaches in Evaluation" Jossey-Bass 17 : 1983

    21 Cronbach, L. J., "Toward Reform of Program Evaluation" Jossey-Bass 1980

    22 Aldrich, Virgil C., "The Spirit of the New Positivism" 1940

    23 Lasswell, Harold D., "The Policy Orientation in : the Policy Science" Stanford University Press 1951

    24 Shulock, Nancy, "The Paradox of Policy Analysis: If It Is Not Used, Why Do We Produce So Much of It" 18 (18): 1999

    25 Brewer, Garry D., "The Foundations of Policy Analysis" The Dorsey Press 1983

    26 Mark, M. M., "Stakeholder-based Evaluation and Value Judgments" 9 : 605-636, 1985

    27 Abma Tineke A., "Stake's Responsive Evaluation: Core Ideas and Evolution" Sage Publications 2 : 62-79, 2005

    28 Bardach, Eugene., "Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management" 1 : 161-171, 1981

    29 Campbell, D.T., "Reforms as Experiments" 24 (24): 409-429, 1969

    30 Patton, M. Q., "Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods" Sage Publications, Inc. 2002

    31 Creswell, J. W., "Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions" Sage Publications, Inc. 1998

    32 Lasswell, Harold D., "Psychopathology and Politic" Viking Press 1960

    33 Bailey, J. R., "Positivism and the Promise of the Social Sciences" 4 (4): 1994

    34 Lasswell, Harold D., "Politics: Who Gets What, When, and How" Meridian 1958

    35 DeLeon, Peter, "Policy Formulation: Where Ignorant Armies Clash By Night" 111 : 389-405, 1992

    36 May, Peter J., "Policy Analysis: Past, Present, and Future" 49 (49): 1989

    37 Hird, John A., "Policy Analysis for What? The Effectiveness of Nonpartisan Policy Research Organizations" 33 (33): 2005

    38 Moustakas, C., "Phenomenological Research Methods" Sage Publications, Inc. 1994

    39 Papineau, Danielle, "Participatory Evaluation in a Community Organization: Fostering Stakeholder Empowerment and Utilization. Evaluation Research Methods. London: Sage Publications, vol. 2. 68." 19 (19): 79-93, 1996

    40 Alvey, J. E., "Overcoming Positivism in Economics: Amartya Sen's Project of Infusing Ethics into Economics" 16 (16): 227-246, 2005

    41 Guba, E. G., "Naturalistic Inquiry" Sage Publications, Inc. 1985

    42 deLeon, Peter, "Models of policy discourse: Insights vs prediction in : Policy Sciences" Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association 1998

    43 Francisco, V. T., "Key Issues in Evaluation: Quantitative and Qualitative Methods and Research Design" .2 (.2): 20-23, 2002

    44 Jennings, Bruce, "Interpretation and the practice of policy analysis in : Confronting Values in Policy Analysis" Sage Publications, Inc. 1987

    45 Hammond, K. R., "Human Judgment and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncertainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice" Oxford University Press 1996

    46 Denzin, N. K., "Handbook of Qualitative Research" Sage

    47 Shadish, W. R., "Foundations of Program Evaluation-Theories and Practice" Sage Publication 1991

    48 Campbell, D.T., "Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research" Rand McNally 1966

    49 Wholey, J. S., "Evaluation: Promise and Performance" Urban Institute 1979

    50 Rossi, P. H., "Evaluation: A Systematic Approach" Sage Publications 1999

    51 Whitmore, E., "Evaluation and Empowerment: It's the Process That Counts" Cornell Empowerment Project 2 : 1991

    52 Weiss, C. H., "Evaluation Research: Methods of Assessing Program Effectiveness" Prentice Hall 1972

    53 Stern, Elliot, "Evaluation Research Methods. vol. 1, 2, 3, 4" Sage Publications 2005

    54 Weiss, C. H., "Evaluation" Prentice Hall 1998

    55 Stake, R. E., "Evaluating the Arts in Education: A Responsive Approach" Merrill 1975

    56 Fisher, Frank, "Evaluating Public Policy" Nelson-Hall Publishers 1995

    57 Wholey, J. S., "Evaluability Assessment: Developing Program Theory. New Directions for Program Evaluation" Jossey-Bass 1987

    58 OECD, "Doing Evaluation" OECD 1980

    59 Blaikie Norman, "Designing Social Research: The Logic of Anticipation" Blackwell Publishers Inc. 2000

    60 Cronbach, L. J., "Designing Evaluations of Educational and Social Programs" Jossey-Bass 1982

    61 Balfour, D. L., "Connecting the local narratives: Public Administration as a hermeneutic science" 54 : 559-564, 1994

    62 Guba, E. G., "Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research in : Handbook of Qualitative Research" Sage Publications, Inc. 1994

    63 Stake, R. E., "Case Study Methodology in Educational Evaluation" Minnesota Research and Evaluation Center 1981

    64 Lawlor, Edward F, "Book review" 15 (15): 110-121, 1996

    65 Bhaskar, R., "A Realist Theory of Science" Leed Books 1975

    66 Lasswell, Harold D., "A Pre-view of Policy Sciences" American Elsevier 1971

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.73 0.73 0.64
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.84 0.95 0.738 0.32
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼