RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    협력거버넌스 형성의 미시적 이해 -정식모형(formal model)의 관점에서 바라본 지역 협력 거버넌스의 성립조건- = Micro Understanding of Collaborative Governance: Condition for Regional Partnership Formation

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101975297

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Local economic development policy is often described as a competitive environment in which local jurisdictions compete with each other for creating jobs and increasing the tax base. However, interjurisdictional competition combined with fragmented decision making in US metropolitan area tend to result in many regional problems such as diseconomies of scale, negative externalities, duplication of similar policies, and so on. Therefore, there has been an increasing number of approaches to address regional problems through targeted collaborative efforts. One of the main puzzles to scholars in the field of urban studies and public policy is that the fragmentation of jurisdictional authorities in metropolitan areas creates a self-organizing community to address intergovernmental problems. Formal Model approach provide useful answers to how and to what extent motivations of individual local governments affect the emergence and sustainability of self-organizing interlocal collaboration to address regional economic development. The purpose of study is to examine the utility of Park and Lee model (2009) of regional partnership formation by employing the techniques of computational science. The formal model of regional partnership formation, in fact, examines the effect of group size, degree of decision fragmentation, and benefits/costs structure on regional collaboration. The findings from this study is that the degree of decision fragmentation shows a non-linear relationship with regional partnership formation. This further implies that overall configurations of regional partnership heavily depend upon the level of uncertainty and the extent to which local jurisdictions attempt to retain their local autonomy.
    번역하기

    Local economic development policy is often described as a competitive environment in which local jurisdictions compete with each other for creating jobs and increasing the tax base. However, interjurisdictional competition combined with fragmented dec...

    Local economic development policy is often described as a competitive environment in which local jurisdictions compete with each other for creating jobs and increasing the tax base. However, interjurisdictional competition combined with fragmented decision making in US metropolitan area tend to result in many regional problems such as diseconomies of scale, negative externalities, duplication of similar policies, and so on. Therefore, there has been an increasing number of approaches to address regional problems through targeted collaborative efforts. One of the main puzzles to scholars in the field of urban studies and public policy is that the fragmentation of jurisdictional authorities in metropolitan areas creates a self-organizing community to address intergovernmental problems. Formal Model approach provide useful answers to how and to what extent motivations of individual local governments affect the emergence and sustainability of self-organizing interlocal collaboration to address regional economic development. The purpose of study is to examine the utility of Park and Lee model (2009) of regional partnership formation by employing the techniques of computational science. The formal model of regional partnership formation, in fact, examines the effect of group size, degree of decision fragmentation, and benefits/costs structure on regional collaboration. The findings from this study is that the degree of decision fragmentation shows a non-linear relationship with regional partnership formation. This further implies that overall configurations of regional partnership heavily depend upon the level of uncertainty and the extent to which local jurisdictions attempt to retain their local autonomy.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정문기, "지역경제개발의 협력거버넌스" 한국행정학회 43 (43): 229-259, 2009

    2 박형준, "지역개발정책수단으로서 협력적 지역 거버넌스의 형성 - 승리연합 (winning coalition)게임 모형을 통한 지역 파트너쉽 형성 모형설정 -" 한국정책학회 18 (18): 7-35, 2009

    3 김두래, "지방정책네트워크가 분권적 규제집행에 미치는 영향: 한국 지방정부 환경규제를 중심으로" 한국행정학회 44 (44): 183-202, 2010

    4 배응환, "신지역주의와 협력거버넌스: 광역경제권 설계의 전제" 한국행정학회 44 (44): 203-232, 2010

    5 박재욱, "광역권역의 통합 · 협력을 위한 광역거버넌스의 이론적 논의" 한국지방행정연구원 22 (22): 3-29, 2008

    6 이원섭, "광역경제권 구축방향과 과제" 6-25, 2008

    7 Gulati, Ranjay, "Where Do Interorganizationl Networks Come From?" 104 (104): 1439-1493, 1999

    8 Swanstrom, Todd, "What We Argue About When We Argue about Regionalism" 23 (23): 479-496, 2001

    9 Olson, Mancur, "The logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups" Harvard University Press 1971

    10 Oakerson, Ronald J., "The Study of Metropolitan Governance, In Decentralized governance: The organization of local governments in metropolitan areas" Georgetown University Press 2004

    1 정문기, "지역경제개발의 협력거버넌스" 한국행정학회 43 (43): 229-259, 2009

    2 박형준, "지역개발정책수단으로서 협력적 지역 거버넌스의 형성 - 승리연합 (winning coalition)게임 모형을 통한 지역 파트너쉽 형성 모형설정 -" 한국정책학회 18 (18): 7-35, 2009

    3 김두래, "지방정책네트워크가 분권적 규제집행에 미치는 영향: 한국 지방정부 환경규제를 중심으로" 한국행정학회 44 (44): 183-202, 2010

    4 배응환, "신지역주의와 협력거버넌스: 광역경제권 설계의 전제" 한국행정학회 44 (44): 203-232, 2010

    5 박재욱, "광역권역의 통합 · 협력을 위한 광역거버넌스의 이론적 논의" 한국지방행정연구원 22 (22): 3-29, 2008

    6 이원섭, "광역경제권 구축방향과 과제" 6-25, 2008

    7 Gulati, Ranjay, "Where Do Interorganizationl Networks Come From?" 104 (104): 1439-1493, 1999

    8 Swanstrom, Todd, "What We Argue About When We Argue about Regionalism" 23 (23): 479-496, 2001

    9 Olson, Mancur, "The logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups" Harvard University Press 1971

    10 Oakerson, Ronald J., "The Study of Metropolitan Governance, In Decentralized governance: The organization of local governments in metropolitan areas" Georgetown University Press 2004

    11 Wallis, John Joseph, "The Great Depression: Have We Learned Our Lessons?, In Second Thought: The Uses of American Economic History" Oxford University Press 1991

    12 Axelrod, Robert, "The Evolution of Cooperation" Basic Books 1984

    13 Stevens, J. B., "The Economics of Collective Action" Westview Press 1993

    14 Weir, Margaret, "The Calculus of Coalitions: Cities, Suburbs, and the Metropolitan Agenda" 40 (40): 730-776, 2005

    15 McCabe, Barbara, "Special-District Formation among the States" 32 (32): 121-131, 2000

    16 McCabe, Barbara, "Special Districts as an Alternative to Consolidation: In Reshaping the Local Landscape: Perspectives on City-County Consolidation and its Alternatives" M.E. Sharpe 2003

    17 Ostrom, Elinor, "Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources" University of Michigan Press 1994

    18 Parks, Roger B., "Regionalism, Localism, and Metropolitan Governance: Suggestion from the Research Program on Local Public Economies" 32 (32): 169-179, 2000

    19 Nitzan, S, "Private Provision of a Discrete Public Good with Uncertain Cost" 42 : 357-370, 1990

    20 Palfrey, T, "Private Incentives in Social Dilemmas" 35 : 309-332, 1988

    21 Savitch, H. V., "Path to New Regionalism" 32 (32): 158-168, 2000

    22 Palfrey, T, "Participation and the Provision of Discrete Public Goods: A strategic Analysis" 24 : 171-193, 1984

    23 Orfield, Myron, "Metropolitics: A Regional Agenda for Community and Stability" Brookings Institution 1997

    24 Post, Stephanie, "Metropolitan area governance and institutional collective action" 2002

    25 Savitch, H. V., "Metropolitan Consolidation versus Metropolitan Governance in Louisville" 32 (32): 198-212, 2000

    26 Lewis, Paul G., "Looking Outward or Turing Inward?: Motivations for Development Decisions in CaliforniaCentralCitiesandSuburbs" 36 (36): 696-720, 2001

    27 Ostrom, Elinor, "Local Government in the United States" Institute for Contemporary Studies Press 1988

    28 Post, Stephanie, "Local Government Cooperation: The Relationship between Metropolitan Area Government Geography and Service Delivery" 2002

    29 Hyung Jun Park, "Institutional Collective Action, Social Capital and Regional Deveplopment Partnership" 한국행정학회 11 (11): 57-70, 2007

    30 Feiock, Richard, "Institutional Collective Action and Economic Development Joint Venture" 69 (69): 257-270, 2009

    31 Issac, R. Mark, "Group Size Effects in Public Goods Provision: The Voluntary Contributions Mechanism" 103 (103): 179-199, 1988

    32 Oakerson, Ronald J., "Governing Loca lPublic Economics: Creating the Civil Metropolis" ICS Press 1999

    33 Olberding, Julie C., "Does Regionalism Beget Regionalism?: The Relationship between Norms and Regional Partnerships for Economic Development" 62 : 480-491, 2002

    34 Voith, Richard, "Do Suburbs Need Cities?" 38 (38): 445-464, 1998

    35 Olberding, Julie C., "Diving into the ‘Third Waves’ of Regional Governance Strategies: A Study of Regional Partnerships for Economic Development in U.S. Metropolitan Areas" 16 : 251-272, 2002

    36 McBride, Michael, "Discrete Public Goods under Threshold Uncertainty" 90 : 1181-1199, 2006

    37 Feiock, Richard C., "Decentralized Governance: The Organization of Local Governments in Metropolitan Areas" Georgetown University Press 2004

    38 Ostrom, Elinor, "Covenants with and without a Sword: Self-Governance is Possible" 86 : 404-417, 1992

    39 de Marchi, Scott, "Computational and Mathematical Modeling in the Social Science" Cambridge University Press 2005

    40 Ledebur, Larry C., "City Distress, Metropolitan Disparities and Economics Growth" National League of Cities 1992

    41 Van de Kragt, "Are People who Cooperate ‘Rational Altruists’?" 56 (56): 233-247, 1988

    42 Van de Kragt, "Are People who Cooperate ‘Rational Altruists?" 56 (56): 233-247, 1988

    43 Tiebout, Charles, "A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures" 1956

    44 Ostrom, Elinor, "A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action" 92 (92): 1-22, 1998

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2018-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.69 1.69 1.76
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.83 1.8 1.759 0.69
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼