RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    신뢰도 연구에서 급내상관계수와 관련한 표본수 결정 방법 비교 = A Comparison of Sample Size Requirements for Intraclass Correlation Coefficient(ICC)

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105210134

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In medical practice and research, the problem of assessing reliability between two or more quantitative measures is quite common. Intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC) is commonly used to scale of reliability. Some methods were developed to calculate the required number of subjects, raters or replicates in one-way or two-way random ANOVA models. This paper, studies and compares the performance of four methods such as Walter et al. (1998), Giraudeau and Mary (2001), Saito et al. (2006) and Bonett (2002). In order to compare the efficiency of methods we compare the number of subjects, replicates and the width of confidence interval of ICC needed for some specific ICC values. In the case of subject size, Giraudeau's method is the best. In case of the number of replicates, Saito's method was superior to others. The width of confidence interval of ICC was narrower for Giraudeau's method than any others.
    번역하기

    In medical practice and research, the problem of assessing reliability between two or more quantitative measures is quite common. Intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC) is commonly used to scale of reliability. Some methods were developed to calculat...

    In medical practice and research, the problem of assessing reliability between two or more quantitative measures is quite common. Intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC) is commonly used to scale of reliability. Some methods were developed to calculate the required number of subjects, raters or replicates in one-way or two-way random ANOVA models. This paper, studies and compares the performance of four methods such as Walter et al. (1998), Giraudeau and Mary (2001), Saito et al. (2006) and Bonett (2002). In order to compare the efficiency of methods we compare the number of subjects, replicates and the width of confidence interval of ICC needed for some specific ICC values. In the case of subject size, Giraudeau's method is the best. In case of the number of replicates, Saito's method was superior to others. The width of confidence interval of ICC was narrower for Giraudeau's method than any others.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Landis, J. R, "The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data" 33 : 159-174, 1977

    2 Fisher,R.A, "Statistical Methods for Research Workers" Hafner 1954

    3 Donner, A, "Sample size requirements for reliability studies" 6 : 441-448, 1987

    4 Bonett,D.G, "Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision" 21 : 1331-1335, 2002

    5 Walter, S. D, "Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies" 17 : 101-110, 1998

    6 Giraudeau, B, "Planning a reproducibility study, how many subjects and how many replicates per subject for an expected width of the 95 per cent confidence interval of the intraclass correlation coeficient" 20 : 3205-3214, 2001

    7 White, S. A, "Methods for assessing reliability and validity for a measurement tool, a case study and critique using the WHO Haemoglobin Colour Scale" 23 : 1603-1619, 2004

    8 Shrout, P. E, "Intraclass Correlation, uses in assessing rater reliability" 86 : 420-428, 1979

    9 Rosner,B, "Fundamentals of Biostatistics" Thomson Brooks/Cole 2005

    10 Saito, Y, "Effective number of subjects and number of raters for inter-rater reliability studies" 25 : 1547-1560, 2006

    1 Landis, J. R, "The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data" 33 : 159-174, 1977

    2 Fisher,R.A, "Statistical Methods for Research Workers" Hafner 1954

    3 Donner, A, "Sample size requirements for reliability studies" 6 : 441-448, 1987

    4 Bonett,D.G, "Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision" 21 : 1331-1335, 2002

    5 Walter, S. D, "Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies" 17 : 101-110, 1998

    6 Giraudeau, B, "Planning a reproducibility study, how many subjects and how many replicates per subject for an expected width of the 95 per cent confidence interval of the intraclass correlation coeficient" 20 : 3205-3214, 2001

    7 White, S. A, "Methods for assessing reliability and validity for a measurement tool, a case study and critique using the WHO Haemoglobin Colour Scale" 23 : 1603-1619, 2004

    8 Shrout, P. E, "Intraclass Correlation, uses in assessing rater reliability" 86 : 420-428, 1979

    9 Rosner,B, "Fundamentals of Biostatistics" Thomson Brooks/Cole 2005

    10 Saito, Y, "Effective number of subjects and number of raters for inter-rater reliability studies" 25 : 1547-1560, 2006

    11 Johnson, N. L, "Distributions in Statistics, Continuous Univariate Distrubution 2" John Wiley & Sons 1970

    12 Donner, A, "A note on the accuracy of Fisher's approximation to the large sample variance of an intraclass correlation" 12 : 443-449, 1983

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2000-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.38 0.38 0.38
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.35 0.34 0.565 0.17
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼