RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    안젤름 키퍼의 작품에 재현된 역사의 이미지 = 멜랑콜리, 알레고리, 성좌

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Anselm Kiefer is the prominent Neo-Expressionist, who insistently dealt with the German history of Fascism, which was repressed to recall during the post war era in Germany. This paper focuses on the investigation of Anselm Kiefer’s art in terms of Walter Benjamin’s three main philosophic concepts: ‘melancholy’, ‘allegory’ and ‘constellation’.
    Benjamin was against the concept of history as lineal progress that was rooted in rationalism and Enlightenment, resulting to the illustration of history as a process towards catastrophe. Kiefer shared this view of history and expressed into his work by the aesthetic of ruins. But at the same time, this ‘melancholic’ perspective, regarding history as a catastrophic loss, also involves the aspiration for redemption. This dialectic aspect of Melancholy is implicit in Kiefer’s art works, inspired by Durer’s 〈Melancholia I〉 and Klee’s 〈Angelus Novus〉.
    The way how Kiefer visualized his melancholic view of history relates to Benjamin’s concept of allegory. The term ‘allegory’, which is a mode of artistic expression as well as an attitude, was denigrated for a long time as inferior to symbol, until Benjamin focused on it and reestimated its potentiality. In allegory, the relationship between a signifier and the signified is not fixed but rather arbitrary, having a great potential of meaning. This operation works the same as of the ‘constellation’, which means the process of getting to the ‘idea’ by arranging and forming various empirical phenomenon into the overall structure of particular aspects.
    Kiefer’s works, as sedimentations of various fragments, can be referred to layered and fragmented complexity, which constitute the allegorical image of history as ruin. Those heterogeneous elements reverberate with cross-reference. Overlapping fields of forces are not easily assimilated to coherent interpretation and remain in permanent fluctuation. The create endless chains of semiosis, whose unifying signification is constantly deferred. Such allegorical mode is the only way to represent inevitably defective history and the dialectic melancholic gaze in it.
    번역하기

    Anselm Kiefer is the prominent Neo-Expressionist, who insistently dealt with the German history of Fascism, which was repressed to recall during the post war era in Germany. This paper focuses on the investigation of Anselm Kiefer’s art in terms of ...

    Anselm Kiefer is the prominent Neo-Expressionist, who insistently dealt with the German history of Fascism, which was repressed to recall during the post war era in Germany. This paper focuses on the investigation of Anselm Kiefer’s art in terms of Walter Benjamin’s three main philosophic concepts: ‘melancholy’, ‘allegory’ and ‘constellation’.
    Benjamin was against the concept of history as lineal progress that was rooted in rationalism and Enlightenment, resulting to the illustration of history as a process towards catastrophe. Kiefer shared this view of history and expressed into his work by the aesthetic of ruins. But at the same time, this ‘melancholic’ perspective, regarding history as a catastrophic loss, also involves the aspiration for redemption. This dialectic aspect of Melancholy is implicit in Kiefer’s art works, inspired by Durer’s 〈Melancholia I〉 and Klee’s 〈Angelus Novus〉.
    The way how Kiefer visualized his melancholic view of history relates to Benjamin’s concept of allegory. The term ‘allegory’, which is a mode of artistic expression as well as an attitude, was denigrated for a long time as inferior to symbol, until Benjamin focused on it and reestimated its potentiality. In allegory, the relationship between a signifier and the signified is not fixed but rather arbitrary, having a great potential of meaning. This operation works the same as of the ‘constellation’, which means the process of getting to the ‘idea’ by arranging and forming various empirical phenomenon into the overall structure of particular aspects.
    Kiefer’s works, as sedimentations of various fragments, can be referred to layered and fragmented complexity, which constitute the allegorical image of history as ruin. Those heterogeneous elements reverberate with cross-reference. Overlapping fields of forces are not easily assimilated to coherent interpretation and remain in permanent fluctuation. The create endless chains of semiosis, whose unifying signification is constantly deferred. Such allegorical mode is the only way to represent inevitably defective history and the dialectic melancholic gaze in it.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서언
    • Ⅱ. 키퍼의 작품과 멜랑콜리
    • Ⅲ. 재현 원리로서의 알레고리 그리고 성좌
    • Ⅳ. 결어
    • 참고문헌
    • Ⅰ. 서언
    • Ⅱ. 키퍼의 작품과 멜랑콜리
    • Ⅲ. 재현 원리로서의 알레고리 그리고 성좌
    • Ⅳ. 결어
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼