RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    방송통신심의위원회의 독립성 확보방안에 관한 연구 = A study on independence acqusition method of Korea Communications Standards Commission

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100111346

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Where needs arise to perform part of duties independently, an administrative agencymay establish a representative administrative agency, such as administrative committee,etc. For guaranteeing the public nature and fairness of broadcasting contents, cresting asound culture in the areas of information and communications and creating anenvironment where information and communications are used in an appropriate manner,the Korea Communications Standards Commission(hereinafter referred to as the “KCSC”)established to perform its duties independently by the Act on the establishment andoperation of Korea Communications Commission in Feb. 29, 2008. But there are someproblems as follows. First, legal status of KCSC is vague so there are some problems toperformance of KCSC``s duties such as administrative appeals, information disclosure,electronic lawsuit. Second, authority of deliberation and decision on sanctions aredualized by the Act on the establishment and operation of Korea CommunicationsCommission ; while KCSC has authority to deliberation on broadcasting and internetcontent - the deliberation authority on matters falling under Article 32 of theBroadcasting Act and Article 44-7 of the Act of Promotion of information,Communications Network Utilization and information Protection. ect, decision on sanctions, etc. under Article 100 of the Broadcasting Act and requests for correction, theKorea Communications Commission(hereinafter referred to as the KCC) has authorityto decision on sanctions but constitutional court granted KCSC disposition of requestsfor correction on internet contents deliberation. Third, KCSC has not authority to reviewbill related content. For perform KCSC’s duties independently, we should improve problems of laws andsystem about contents deliberation on broadcasting and internet. First, we have to grantKCSC independent regulatory agency to clarify the legal statue of KCSC. Second, weshould amend the laws of contents deliberation to unify deliberation authority anddisposition authority. Third, for perform deliberation contents independently, we shouldgrant KCSC authority to review bill related content.
    번역하기

    Where needs arise to perform part of duties independently, an administrative agencymay establish a representative administrative agency, such as administrative committee,etc. For guaranteeing the public nature and fairness of broadcasting contents, cr...

    Where needs arise to perform part of duties independently, an administrative agencymay establish a representative administrative agency, such as administrative committee,etc. For guaranteeing the public nature and fairness of broadcasting contents, cresting asound culture in the areas of information and communications and creating anenvironment where information and communications are used in an appropriate manner,the Korea Communications Standards Commission(hereinafter referred to as the “KCSC”)established to perform its duties independently by the Act on the establishment andoperation of Korea Communications Commission in Feb. 29, 2008. But there are someproblems as follows. First, legal status of KCSC is vague so there are some problems toperformance of KCSC``s duties such as administrative appeals, information disclosure,electronic lawsuit. Second, authority of deliberation and decision on sanctions aredualized by the Act on the establishment and operation of Korea CommunicationsCommission ; while KCSC has authority to deliberation on broadcasting and internetcontent - the deliberation authority on matters falling under Article 32 of theBroadcasting Act and Article 44-7 of the Act of Promotion of information,Communications Network Utilization and information Protection. ect, decision on sanctions, etc. under Article 100 of the Broadcasting Act and requests for correction, theKorea Communications Commission(hereinafter referred to as the KCC) has authorityto decision on sanctions but constitutional court granted KCSC disposition of requestsfor correction on internet contents deliberation. Third, KCSC has not authority to reviewbill related content. For perform KCSC’s duties independently, we should improve problems of laws andsystem about contents deliberation on broadcasting and internet. First, we have to grantKCSC independent regulatory agency to clarify the legal statue of KCSC. Second, weshould amend the laws of contents deliberation to unify deliberation authority anddisposition authority. Third, for perform deliberation contents independently, we shouldgrant KCSC authority to review bill related content.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼