RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Q 방법론을 이용한 예산 황새마을 조성사업의 갈등구조 분석 = Conflict Structure Analysis on the Construction of stork Eco-Village in Yesangun Using Q methodology

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100352176

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Ecotourism has the potential to boost the energy of a village as it pays keen attention to the ecosystem and the residents of the village. It is empowered by participation of and cooperation among stakeholders who are closely involved in ecotourism. However, many of them express difficulty in striking a right balance between development and conservation with regard to promoting ecotourism. Against this backdrop, this research paper investigates the structure of conflict that the stakeholders, especially those in Stork Village in Yesan County, South Chungcheong Province of Korea, experience during the process of establishment of government-led ecotourism. In addition, this study examines the problems of government-led ecotourism model and how they can be addressed. To analyze conflict structure, this paper used Q methods and found out that the budget-related stakeholders are largely divided into four groups as who; a) complain about how business profits are distributed; b) secure profits by expanding programs; c) consider human settlement, and; d) broaden people`s participation. The biggest contributor to the conflicts is found that compensation was given discriminately to different jurisdictions. The second finding is that residents became less cooperative when the financial compensation did not live up to their expectation. For instance, they would demand the tourism facility physically expanded, repeatedly complain about the process of the work, and even accuse the government of degrading ecosystem. In other words, unless the compromise is reached with the residents regarding financial compensation, it could be difficult to encourage their participation and develop as a program-oriented tour. Lastly, the tour program needs to induce voluntary participation of the residents and deliver proper information on ecosystem and natural resources so as to last as sustainable ecotourism. The success of ecotourism will be subject to the cooperation of stakeholders in a region, conservation of our fragile ecosystem, and realization of sustainable growth through sharing economic benefits. This study looks into the cause of the conflicts of ecotourism sites and their structure. If this paper can bring about cooperation of stakeholders, the management and operation of ecotourism sites would be more sustainable.
    번역하기

    Ecotourism has the potential to boost the energy of a village as it pays keen attention to the ecosystem and the residents of the village. It is empowered by participation of and cooperation among stakeholders who are closely involved in ecotourism. H...

    Ecotourism has the potential to boost the energy of a village as it pays keen attention to the ecosystem and the residents of the village. It is empowered by participation of and cooperation among stakeholders who are closely involved in ecotourism. However, many of them express difficulty in striking a right balance between development and conservation with regard to promoting ecotourism. Against this backdrop, this research paper investigates the structure of conflict that the stakeholders, especially those in Stork Village in Yesan County, South Chungcheong Province of Korea, experience during the process of establishment of government-led ecotourism. In addition, this study examines the problems of government-led ecotourism model and how they can be addressed. To analyze conflict structure, this paper used Q methods and found out that the budget-related stakeholders are largely divided into four groups as who; a) complain about how business profits are distributed; b) secure profits by expanding programs; c) consider human settlement, and; d) broaden people`s participation. The biggest contributor to the conflicts is found that compensation was given discriminately to different jurisdictions. The second finding is that residents became less cooperative when the financial compensation did not live up to their expectation. For instance, they would demand the tourism facility physically expanded, repeatedly complain about the process of the work, and even accuse the government of degrading ecosystem. In other words, unless the compromise is reached with the residents regarding financial compensation, it could be difficult to encourage their participation and develop as a program-oriented tour. Lastly, the tour program needs to induce voluntary participation of the residents and deliver proper information on ecosystem and natural resources so as to last as sustainable ecotourism. The success of ecotourism will be subject to the cooperation of stakeholders in a region, conservation of our fragile ecosystem, and realization of sustainable growth through sharing economic benefits. This study looks into the cause of the conflicts of ecotourism sites and their structure. If this paper can bring about cooperation of stakeholders, the management and operation of ecotourism sites would be more sustainable.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이재혁, "지속가능한 생태관광을 위한 평가지표 개발 및 적용에 관한 연구" 대한지리학회 47 (47): 853-869, 2012

    2 김진, "생태관광활동 참여에 따른 관광환경태도의 변화 - 우포늪 습지 방문객을 중심으로 -" 한국조경학회 39 (39): 56-64, 2011

    3 이호영, "생태관광지 유형별 탐방객 특성 및 자연환경 훼손에 대한 인식 비교 연구" 한국환경생태학회 26 (26): 264-272, 2012

    4 김정민, "산림기반형 한방치유 관광상품의 선호도에 관한 연구" 한국환경생태학회 26 (26): 463-471, 2012

    5 조중현, "농촌지역개발사업 추진과정에서 표출된 주민 간 갈등의 근거 이론적 해석 : 농촌체험마을 사례를 중심으로" 한국농촌계획학회 14 (14): 1-12, 2008

    6 Jungdo Ilbo, "Yes or No about Yesan Stork Eco-village Development"

    7 YTN, "Where is stork Restoration Project going"

    8 Hunter, W. C., "Understanding Resident Subjectivities toward Tourism Using Q method:Orchid Island, Taiwan" 21 (21): 331-354, 2013

    9 Kim, S. E., "Theory and Philosophy of the Q Methodology" 20 (20): 1-25, 2010

    10 Russell C. Hurd, "The Future of the Q Methodology Movement" 28 (28): 58-96, 2004

    1 이재혁, "지속가능한 생태관광을 위한 평가지표 개발 및 적용에 관한 연구" 대한지리학회 47 (47): 853-869, 2012

    2 김진, "생태관광활동 참여에 따른 관광환경태도의 변화 - 우포늪 습지 방문객을 중심으로 -" 한국조경학회 39 (39): 56-64, 2011

    3 이호영, "생태관광지 유형별 탐방객 특성 및 자연환경 훼손에 대한 인식 비교 연구" 한국환경생태학회 26 (26): 264-272, 2012

    4 김정민, "산림기반형 한방치유 관광상품의 선호도에 관한 연구" 한국환경생태학회 26 (26): 463-471, 2012

    5 조중현, "농촌지역개발사업 추진과정에서 표출된 주민 간 갈등의 근거 이론적 해석 : 농촌체험마을 사례를 중심으로" 한국농촌계획학회 14 (14): 1-12, 2008

    6 Jungdo Ilbo, "Yes or No about Yesan Stork Eco-village Development"

    7 YTN, "Where is stork Restoration Project going"

    8 Hunter, W. C., "Understanding Resident Subjectivities toward Tourism Using Q method:Orchid Island, Taiwan" 21 (21): 331-354, 2013

    9 Kim, S. E., "Theory and Philosophy of the Q Methodology" 20 (20): 1-25, 2010

    10 Russell C. Hurd, "The Future of the Q Methodology Movement" 28 (28): 58-96, 2004

    11 Kyunghyang Shinmun, "Stork-village which Attack Storks"

    12 Yesangun, "Regional Plan of Stork Village in Yesan, Chungcheongnamdo"

    13 이순자, "Q 방법론을 활용한 갈등행위자 인식유형 및 특성에 관한 연구 : 가로림조력발전소 건설계획을 중심으로" 한국지방행정연구원 25 (25): 271-302, 2011

    14 김흥규, "Q 방법론 (과학철학, 이론, 분석 그리고 적용)" 커뮤니케이션북스 2008

    15 Kim, H. G, "Q Methodology(Philosophy of Challenges of Planned Eco- tourism: Q Methodology and AHP Analysis for Stakeholders’ Response" 2008

    16 Kim, S. E., "Q Method & Sociology" Gold Well Publishing Inc 2007

    17 White, N. E, "International Handbook on Ecotourism" Edward Elgar Publishing 2013

    18 Coles, T., "Ecotourism, NGOs and Development. A Critical Analysis" 12 (12): 295-296, 2009

    19 Wunder, S., "Ecotourism and Economic Incentives—an Empirical approach" 32 (32): 465-479, 2000

    20 Lee, J. H., "Current Status and Challenges of Planned Eco- tourism: Q Methodology and AHP Analysis for Stakeholders’ Response, Focusing on Maha eco-tourism site in Pyeongchang-gun where 2018 Olympic & Paralympic Winter Games will be held" 2013

    21 Korean Research Institute for Humen Settlement, "Conflict Management in Spatial Development Project ; Exploring People’s Conception and Finding Policy Application" Korean Research Institute for Humen Settlement 2010

    22 Gurung, D. B, "Community-based Ecotourism in Bhutan: Expert Evaluation of Stakeholder-based Scenarios" 15 (15): 397-411, 2008

    23 Graci, S., "Collaboration and Partnership Development for Sustainable Tourism" 15 (15): 25-42, 2013

    24 Chungcheong Today, "Chungnam, Preparing Budget without any Plan"

    25 García-Melón, M., "A Combined ANP-delphi Approach to Evaluate Sustainable Tourism" 34 : 41-50, 2012

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-07-07 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning KCI등재후보
    2006-06-19 학술지등록 한글명 : 농촌계획
    외국어명 : 미등록
    KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.63 0.63 0.59
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.57 0.55 0.727 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼