법규칙과 법원리 구별의 유용성과 한계

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper is about the utility of distinguishing principles of law from rules of law and its limits. Especially, it treats legal theories of Dworkin and Alexy, which are related to the standards of distinguishing between legal rules and legal principles. And it treats three models of legal system which can be appeared from the result of critical look-over about such discussions. According to Dworkin, legal rules and legal principles are logically and structurally distinctive in that the former has all-or-nothing-character on the one hand and the latter has dimension of weight or importance on the other hand. According to Alexy, both are distinguished in that whereas principles are optimal orders, rules are definite ones. Such distinctions are useful in understanding what law is and which norms legal system includes. Furthermore, the theory of principles is practically very meaningful in that it provides the judge with a clue to make a decision in hard case. When man acknowledges the usefulness of distinguishing principles from rules, legal system is apt to be understood as rule-principle model or rule-principle-process model. These models are the ones which understand law under the viewpoint of practical rationality. By the way, I think rule-principle-process model is more proper than rule-principle one in that the former includes a series of forms and standards for rational argumentations. Their legal theories can be very available foundations to understand, search and analyse our legal system and its problems.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 머리말
• Ⅱ. 구별 논의의 출발점
• Ⅲ. 법규칙과 법원리의 관계 및 구별
• Ⅳ. 법규칙, 법원리, 법체계
• Ⅴ. 맺음말
• 참고문헌
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 변종필, "형법해석에서 법정책적 논거원용의 타당성문제" 한국형사법학회 (26) : 509-518, 2006

2 변종필, "형벌조항에 대한 위헌심사와 책임주의" 11 : 449-, 2010

3 로널드 드워킨, "판결하기 어려운 사안" 교육과학사 66-86, 1993

4 카티야 랑엔부허, "영미 법이론에서 법관의 역할" 세창출판사 2003

5 한스 켈젠, "순수법학" 길안사 1999

6 안준홍, "비실증주의 법원리론 비판" 서울대학교 2008

7 이덕연, "법텍스트와 텍스트작업" 법문사 2005

8 로베르트 알렉시, "법체계와 실천이성" 교육과학사 108-141, 1993

9 로베르트 알렉시, "법적 논증이론" 고려대학교출판부 2007

10 변종필, "법의 효력과 근본규범" 안암법학회 (5) : 1997

11 로널드 드워킨, "법의 제국" 아카넷 2004

12 허버트 하트, "법의 개념" 아카넷 2001

13 울리히 펜스키, "법원칙들과 법규율" 교육과학사 87-107, 1993

14 변종필, "법단계론의 구조와 정당화근거, 지안김지수교수 정년기념논문집" 법률출판사 143-, 1996

15 안준홍, "법규칙과 법원리를 질적으로 구별할 가능성에 대한 비판적 고찰" 한국법철학회 11 (11): 427-450, 2008

16 염수균, "법과 권리" 한길사 2010

17 Robert Alexy, "Zum Begriff des Rechtsprinzips, in: Argumentation und Hermeneutik in der Jurisprudenz" 59-87, 1979

18 Ronald Dworkin, "Taking Rights Seriously, 7th impression" 1994

19 Jan-Reinard Sieckmann, "Regelmodelle und Prinzipienmodelle des Rechtssystems, 1.Aufl" Baden-Baden 1990

20 Dennis Patterson, "Recht und Wahrheit, 1.Aufl" Baden-Baden 1996

21 Dennis Patterson, "Normativity and Objectivity in Law, in: Wittgenstein and Law" 2004