RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    대중 집단지성의 사용자 수용 모형에 관한 연구 = A Study on the User Acceptance Model of Mass Collective Intelligence

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82571724

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    As web technologies evolve and so-called Web 2.0 technologies appear, collective intelligence is being applied in widespread areas. In general, mass collective intelligence like Wikipedia is created, revised, and managed by anonymous participants in an uncontrolled system. Thus, the knowledge provided by mass collective intelligence may be distorted, and may not be true, which may affect the user acceptance behavior. However, there have been few academic studies that analyzed the factors that affect user acceptance of mass collective intelligence, and their relationships. Under this academic background, we develop a model to examine how mass collective intelligence is accepted by users. The theoretical model is validated through an online survey of the Wikipedia users from three universities in Korea. The results reveal that the users will have positive attitude towards adopting mass collective knowledge when they perceive that the knowledge from mass collective intelligence is useful. We also find that the perceived usefulness of the knowledge is affected by perceived knowledge quality and trust in knowledge contributors. The results also suggest that perceived knowledge quality is determined by perceived level of collaboration, perceived objectivity, and recipient expertise, whereas trust in knowledge contributors is determined by natural propensity to trust and perceived objectivity. Theoretical and practical implications about mass collective knowledge are discussed.
    번역하기

    As web technologies evolve and so-called Web 2.0 technologies appear, collective intelligence is being applied in widespread areas. In general, mass collective intelligence like Wikipedia is created, revised, and managed by anonymous participants in a...

    As web technologies evolve and so-called Web 2.0 technologies appear, collective intelligence is being applied in widespread areas. In general, mass collective intelligence like Wikipedia is created, revised, and managed by anonymous participants in an uncontrolled system. Thus, the knowledge provided by mass collective intelligence may be distorted, and may not be true, which may affect the user acceptance behavior. However, there have been few academic studies that analyzed the factors that affect user acceptance of mass collective intelligence, and their relationships. Under this academic background, we develop a model to examine how mass collective intelligence is accepted by users. The theoretical model is validated through an online survey of the Wikipedia users from three universities in Korea. The results reveal that the users will have positive attitude towards adopting mass collective knowledge when they perceive that the knowledge from mass collective intelligence is useful. We also find that the perceived usefulness of the knowledge is affected by perceived knowledge quality and trust in knowledge contributors. The results also suggest that perceived knowledge quality is determined by perceived level of collaboration, perceived objectivity, and recipient expertise, whereas trust in knowledge contributors is determined by natural propensity to trust and perceived objectivity. Theoretical and practical implications about mass collective knowledge are discussed.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 이론적 배경
    • 3. 연구모형 : 대중 집단지성의 사용자 수용 모형
    • 4. 연구모형의 검증
    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 이론적 배경
    • 3. 연구모형 : 대중 집단지성의 사용자 수용 모형
    • 4. 연구모형의 검증
    • 5. 결언
    • 참고문헌
    • 저자소개
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 안현철, "집단지성의 사용자 수용 에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구" 1 (1): 101-114, 2009

    2 최항섭, "레비의 집단지성: 대중지성을 넘어 전문가지성의 가능성 모색" 사이버커뮤니케이션학회 26 (26): 287-322, 2009

    3 이형용, "가상 공동체에서의 고객 행동" KAIST 2006

    4 "wikipedia"

    5 Levy,P, "World Philosophie" Odile Jacob 2000

    6 Lih, A, "Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news source" 2004

    7 Black,E.W, "Wikipedia and academic peer review? Wikipedia as a recognized medium for scholarly publication?" 32 (32): 73-88, 2008

    8 Denning, P, "Wikipedia Risks" 48 (48): 152-, 2005

    9 McLure Wasko,M., "Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in Electronic networks of practice" 29 (29): 35-57, 2005

    10 Davis,F.D, "User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models" 35 (35): 982-1003, 1989

    1 안현철, "집단지성의 사용자 수용 에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구" 1 (1): 101-114, 2009

    2 최항섭, "레비의 집단지성: 대중지성을 넘어 전문가지성의 가능성 모색" 사이버커뮤니케이션학회 26 (26): 287-322, 2009

    3 이형용, "가상 공동체에서의 고객 행동" KAIST 2006

    4 "wikipedia"

    5 Levy,P, "World Philosophie" Odile Jacob 2000

    6 Lih, A, "Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news source" 2004

    7 Black,E.W, "Wikipedia and academic peer review? Wikipedia as a recognized medium for scholarly publication?" 32 (32): 73-88, 2008

    8 Denning, P, "Wikipedia Risks" 48 (48): 152-, 2005

    9 McLure Wasko,M., "Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in Electronic networks of practice" 29 (29): 35-57, 2005

    10 Davis,F.D, "User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models" 35 (35): 982-1003, 1989

    11 Moore,T.D, "Understanding Member Motivation for Contributing to Different Types of Virtual Communities: A Proposed Framework" 153-158, 2007

    12 Koufaris,M, "The development of initial trust in an online company by new customers" 41 (41): 377-397, 2004

    13 McKinney,V, "The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction:An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach" 13 (13): 296-315, 2002

    14 Viegas,F.B, "Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualization" 575-582, 2004

    15 Chow,W.S, "Social network,social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing" 45 (45): 458-465, 2008

    16 Resnick,P, "Reputation systems" 43 (43): 45-48, 2000

    17 Nov,O, "Open source content contributors’ response to free-riding:The effect of personality and context" 24 (24): 2848-2861, 2008

    18 Kuznetsov,S, "Motivations of contributors to Wikipedia" 36 (36): 1-7, 2006

    19 Hu,M, "Measuring Article Quality in Wikipedia:Models and Evaluation" Proceedings of CIKM’07 243-252, 2007

    20 Giles,J, "Internet encyclopedias go head to end" 438 : 900-901, 2005

    21 Sussman,S.W, "Informational Influence in Organizations :An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption" 14 (14): 47-65, 2003

    22 Jin, X. L, "How to keep members using the information in a computer- supported social network" 25 (25): 1172-1181,

    23 Cachia,R, "Grasping the potential of online social networks for foresight" 74 (74): 1179-1203, 2007

    24 Sulis,W, "Fundamental Concepts of Collective Intelligence" 1 (1): 35-53, 1997

    25 Saeed, K. A, "Examining the effects of information system characteristics and perceived usefulness on post adoption usage of information systems" 45 (45): 376-386,

    26 Gefen,D, "E-Commerce:The Role of Familiarity and Trust" 28 (28): 725-737, 2000

    27 Lim,K.H, "Do I Trust You Online,and If So,Will I Buy? An Empirical Study of Two Trust-Building Strategies" 23 (23): 233-266, 2006

    28 Shneiderman,B, "Designing trust into online experiences" 43 (43): 57-59, 2000

    29 Priedhorsky,R, "Creating, Destroying, and Restoring Value in Wikipedia" Proceedings of GROUP’07 259-268, 2007

    30 Boder,A, "Collective intelligence:a keystone in knowledge management" 10 (10): 81-93, 2006

    31 Emigh,W, "Collaborative authoring on the Web" 2005

    32 Sherif,K, "Can technology build organizational social capital? The case of a global IT consulting firm" 43 (43): 795-804, 2006

    33 Atlee, T, "Blog of Collective Intelligence:A source document for Collective Intelligence"

    34 Chesney,T, "An empirical examination of Wikipedia’s credibility" 11 (11): 2006

    35 Gerbing,D.W, "An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment" 25 (25): 186-192, 1988

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-04-01 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국데이타베이스학회 -> 한국데이터전략학회
    영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Data Strategy Society
    KCI등재
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-06-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : Journal of Information Technology Applications & Menagement -> Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management
    외국어명 : Journal of Information Technology Applications & Menagement -> Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management
    KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.39 0.39 0.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.59 0.56 0.673 0.18
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼