RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    주식명의신탁 과세연구  :  외국의 입법례와 문제점 중심 = A Comparative Study Regarding Imposition of Gift Tax on Stock Registered in Another Person's Name

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In light of existing customary taxing practices and court rulings, the gift tax imposed by regulations concerning legal fiction in donation of title trust in accordance with Inheritance and Gift Tax Act carries the connotation of ""sanctions"" or ""penalty"" rather than actual ""tax""
    In general, the fundamental purpose of tax is in meeting the fiscal need of the national government and local autonomous government agencies, but another leg of its purpose is the function as a political and policy decision tool by the national government.
    However, if this function of taxation as a political or policy tool is over-used, citizens' perception on government tax will sour with defiance, which would result in failing to serve its original purpose the law makers intended.
    Therefore, even if taxes are used as a for policy purposes, it should not go beyond its inherent limits and also should not be at odds with constitutional principles.
    In this sense, previous customary practices on taxation and court rulings concerning the title trusting of stocks are rather inappropriate as in taxing the ""trustee"" who simply lent his/her title although the possible to be blamed is the title ""trusting"" party. Furthermore, any probability of evasion of tax was regarded as intent to evade taxing, as a result even the title trust without the intention of tax evasion was not acknowledged.
    Therefore, if it is necessary to sanction the title trusting of stocks, it would be more appropriate and fair to impose additional tax or penalties through separate laws rather than making a ligal fiction as a gift.
    번역하기

    In light of existing customary taxing practices and court rulings, the gift tax imposed by regulations concerning legal fiction in donation of title trust in accordance with Inheritance and Gift Tax Act carries the connotation of ""sanctions"" or ""pe...

    In light of existing customary taxing practices and court rulings, the gift tax imposed by regulations concerning legal fiction in donation of title trust in accordance with Inheritance and Gift Tax Act carries the connotation of ""sanctions"" or ""penalty"" rather than actual ""tax""
    In general, the fundamental purpose of tax is in meeting the fiscal need of the national government and local autonomous government agencies, but another leg of its purpose is the function as a political and policy decision tool by the national government.
    However, if this function of taxation as a political or policy tool is over-used, citizens' perception on government tax will sour with defiance, which would result in failing to serve its original purpose the law makers intended.
    Therefore, even if taxes are used as a for policy purposes, it should not go beyond its inherent limits and also should not be at odds with constitutional principles.
    In this sense, previous customary practices on taxation and court rulings concerning the title trusting of stocks are rather inappropriate as in taxing the ""trustee"" who simply lent his/her title although the possible to be blamed is the title ""trusting"" party. Furthermore, any probability of evasion of tax was regarded as intent to evade taxing, as a result even the title trust without the intention of tax evasion was not acknowledged.
    Therefore, if it is necessary to sanction the title trusting of stocks, it would be more appropriate and fair to impose additional tax or penalties through separate laws rather than making a ligal fiction as a gift.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 주식명의신탁의 증여의제 관련 이론적 배경
    • Ⅲ. 주식명의신탁관련 외국입법례 검토
    • Ⅳ. 주식명의신탁증여의제 과세의 개선방안 검토
    • Ⅴ. 맺음말
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 주식명의신탁의 증여의제 관련 이론적 배경
    • Ⅲ. 주식명의신탁관련 외국입법례 검토
    • Ⅳ. 주식명의신탁증여의제 과세의 개선방안 검토
    • Ⅴ. 맺음말
    • 【參考文獻】
    • [Abstract]
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼