RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국어 교재에 나타난 학습 활동의 현황과 변천 과정 연구 = A Study on the Present Condition and Change of the Learning Activities in Korean Language Textbooks

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104190074

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    There are many differences between the Korean Textbooks of the past and the most recent Korean Language Education materials. While communicative language teaching and the integrative approach constitute the main current, more recent texts emphasize learning activities which focus on the learner. In this study, and through the analysis of the Korean textbooks, learning activities are arranged into 4 basic categories.
    First, ‘exercises’-in which repeated practice (usually in the form of substitution drills) was used (usually referred to as the audio-lingual method) has been changed to ‘activity’. The substitution drill practice presented a relatively passive repetition activity that was weak in developing learner’s practical communication abilities. The need to use active and original ‘activities’ in the latest learning exercises focused on the learner. Second, the ‘after-learning activity’ was changed to ‘combined learning activity’. The latest learning activities are intensifying and practicing the ‘before/during/after’ aspects of the teaching-learning process. Third, current trends emphasize the four language skills- speaking․listening․reading․writing. Forth, changing the learning activity from ‘self-practice’ to a ‘reciprocal learning activity’ done in pairs or groups is appearing frequently promotes actual verbal interaction and therefore practical communication.
    On this basis, the purpose of the learning activity should be presented clearly, and the frame of the possible learning activity should be presented as a concrete process. Finally, and if the learning activity relates to cultural aspects of the language, it should attract the interest of the learners in order to create as memorable an activity as possible.
    번역하기

    There are many differences between the Korean Textbooks of the past and the most recent Korean Language Education materials. While communicative language teaching and the integrative approach constitute the main current, more recent texts emphasize le...

    There are many differences between the Korean Textbooks of the past and the most recent Korean Language Education materials. While communicative language teaching and the integrative approach constitute the main current, more recent texts emphasize learning activities which focus on the learner. In this study, and through the analysis of the Korean textbooks, learning activities are arranged into 4 basic categories.
    First, ‘exercises’-in which repeated practice (usually in the form of substitution drills) was used (usually referred to as the audio-lingual method) has been changed to ‘activity’. The substitution drill practice presented a relatively passive repetition activity that was weak in developing learner’s practical communication abilities. The need to use active and original ‘activities’ in the latest learning exercises focused on the learner. Second, the ‘after-learning activity’ was changed to ‘combined learning activity’. The latest learning activities are intensifying and practicing the ‘before/during/after’ aspects of the teaching-learning process. Third, current trends emphasize the four language skills- speaking․listening․reading․writing. Forth, changing the learning activity from ‘self-practice’ to a ‘reciprocal learning activity’ done in pairs or groups is appearing frequently promotes actual verbal interaction and therefore practical communication.
    On this basis, the purpose of the learning activity should be presented clearly, and the frame of the possible learning activity should be presented as a concrete process. Finally, and if the learning activity relates to cultural aspects of the language, it should attract the interest of the learners in order to create as memorable an activity as possible.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2012-10-30 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국어 교육 -> 한국어교육 KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.88 0.88 0.94
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.95 1.03 1.37 0.35
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼