RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    혼합식 조사와 웹패널의 (옅은) 빛과 (짙은) 그늘 = Prospects and Problems of the Recent Developments in Social Survey in Korea: Mixed-Mode Survey and Volunteer Web Panel

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102051634

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Mixed-mode survey and (volunteer) web panels are the alternative methods introduced of late as ways to cope with the changing environment. Their formal and substantive bases are reviewed in this paper. After placing them in the ecology of social survey in contemporary Korea, I examine their characteristics and limitations, along with the adjustment methods developed to deal with the problems they incur. Of central concern in the assessment is the fundamental question of whether, or how well, they represent the population. With computer simulations, the biases produced when these requirements are not met are illustrated. Lastly, some concrete and practical steps to take in using these new methods are discussed. The paper once again reminds the role expected of the social survey: It is an instrument to observe the social reality, and it is to provide references for making and evaluating policy as well as basic data for research. In doing so, it reconfirms that the lowering of cost merely for the sake of expediencies and without regard to data quality amounts to nothing useful or meaningful.
    번역하기

    Mixed-mode survey and (volunteer) web panels are the alternative methods introduced of late as ways to cope with the changing environment. Their formal and substantive bases are reviewed in this paper. After placing them in the ecology of social surve...

    Mixed-mode survey and (volunteer) web panels are the alternative methods introduced of late as ways to cope with the changing environment. Their formal and substantive bases are reviewed in this paper. After placing them in the ecology of social survey in contemporary Korea, I examine their characteristics and limitations, along with the adjustment methods developed to deal with the problems they incur. Of central concern in the assessment is the fundamental question of whether, or how well, they represent the population. With computer simulations, the biases produced when these requirements are not met are illustrated. Lastly, some concrete and practical steps to take in using these new methods are discussed. The paper once again reminds the role expected of the social survey: It is an instrument to observe the social reality, and it is to provide references for making and evaluating policy as well as basic data for research. In doing so, it reconfirms that the lowering of cost merely for the sake of expediencies and without regard to data quality amounts to nothing useful or meaningful.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김상욱, "한국종합사회조사 2010" 성균관대학교 출판부 2011

    2 김석호, "한국 사회조사자료 생산의 문제점과 양질의 자료 구축을 위한 모색" 2011

    3 구혜란, "표집방법에 따른 자료의 질: 할당표집과 확률표집의 결과 비교" 2011

    4 이계오, "통계조사의 현황과 전망" 1 (1): 1-20, 2000

    5 통계청, "장래가구추계: 2010년∼2035년"

    6 허명회, "자원자 패널에 의한 인터넷 조사의 성향조정 가중화" 한국조사연구학회 11 (11): 1-28, 2010

    7 임경은, "인터넷조사와 가구방문조사간 데이터 품질비교 -사회조사를 대상으로-" 통계개발원 2009

    8 조성겸, "인터넷 여론조사의정확도 관련요인" 한국조사연구학회 6 (6): 51-74, 2005

    9 이계오, "인터넷 선거조사에서 성향가중모형 적용사례" 한국조사연구학회 10 (10): 21-36, 2009

    10 박무익, "우리나라 조사산업의 현황과 전망" 1 (1): 161-177, 2000

    1 김상욱, "한국종합사회조사 2010" 성균관대학교 출판부 2011

    2 김석호, "한국 사회조사자료 생산의 문제점과 양질의 자료 구축을 위한 모색" 2011

    3 구혜란, "표집방법에 따른 자료의 질: 할당표집과 확률표집의 결과 비교" 2011

    4 이계오, "통계조사의 현황과 전망" 1 (1): 1-20, 2000

    5 통계청, "장래가구추계: 2010년∼2035년"

    6 허명회, "자원자 패널에 의한 인터넷 조사의 성향조정 가중화" 한국조사연구학회 11 (11): 1-28, 2010

    7 임경은, "인터넷조사와 가구방문조사간 데이터 품질비교 -사회조사를 대상으로-" 통계개발원 2009

    8 조성겸, "인터넷 여론조사의정확도 관련요인" 한국조사연구학회 6 (6): 51-74, 2005

    9 이계오, "인터넷 선거조사에서 성향가중모형 적용사례" 한국조사연구학회 10 (10): 21-36, 2009

    10 박무익, "우리나라 조사산업의 현황과 전망" 1 (1): 161-177, 2000

    11 이윤석, "온라인 조사의 응답오차에 대한 연구:설문 응답 시간과 응답 성실성의 관계" 한국조사연구학회 9 (9): 51-83, 2008

    12 조성겸, "생활시간 조사를 이용한 가중치 부여방법: 인터넷 조사에 대한 적용 가능성 검토" 한국조사연구학회 12 (12): 145-157, 2011

    13 조성겸, "새로운 사회여론조사 방법: 모바일 조사방법의 가능성 검토" 한국조사연구학회 4 (4): 1-29, 2003

    14 차종천, "사회조사의 업그레이드: 한국종합사회조사(KGSS) 출발" 성균관대학교 출판부 0-0, 2005

    15 조동기, "사이버공간과 사회조사: 온라인 사회조사의 쟁점과 과제" 1 (1): 73-108, 2000

    16 이희길, "국내 패널조사의 현황분석, 2009" 통계개발원 2009

    17 이흥철, "국내 조사업계의 역사" 한국조사연구학회 3 (3): 123-153, 2002

    18 Martin, Peter., "What Makes a Good Mix? Chances and Challenges of Mixed Mode Data Collection in the ESS" City University London, UK. 2011

    19 Couper, Mick., "Web Survey: A Review of Issues and Approaches" 64 (64): 464-494, 2000

    20 National Research Council., "Using the American Community Survey: Benefits and Challenges" The National Academies Press 2007

    21 de Leeuw, Edith D., "Trends in Household Survey Nonresponse: A Longitudinal and International Comparison, In Survey Nonresponse" Wiley 41-54, 2002

    22 Anderson, Margo, "To Sample or Not to Sample? The 2000 Census Controversy" 30 (30): 1-36, 1999

    23 de Leeuw, Edith D., "To Mix or Not to Mix Data Collection Modes in Surveys" 21 (21): 233-255, 2005

    24 Geertz, Clifford., "The Interpretation of Cultures" Basic Books 1973

    25 Smith, Tom W., "The Globalization of Survey Research, In Survey Methods in Multicultur al, Multinational, and Multiregional Contexts" Wiley 477-484, 2010

    26 Martin, Peter, "The Effects of Mixed Mode Survey Designs on Simple and Complex Analyses" City University London, UK. 2011

    27 Groves, Robert M., "The Decennial Census and the ACS: Looking Back and Looking Ahead" U. S. Census Bureau. 2011

    28 Rosenbaum, Paul R., "The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects" 70 (70): 41-55, 1983

    29 Groves, Robert M., "Survey Methodology (2nd ed.)" Wiley 2009

    30 Gelman, Andrew., "Struggles with Survey Weighting and Regression Modeling" 22 (22): 153-164, 2007

    31 Deming, W. Edwards., "Sample Design in Business Research" Wiley 1960

    32 Baker, Reg, "Research Synthesis: AAPOR Report on Online Panels" 74 (74): 711-781, 2010

    33 Gelman, Andrew, "Rejoinder: Struggles with Survey Weighting and Regression Modeling" 22 (22): 184-188, 2007

    34 Link, Michael W., "Reaching the U.S. Cell Phone Generation: Comparison of Cell Phone Survey Results with an Ongoing Landline Telephone Survey" 71 (71): 814-839, 2007

    35 Revilla, Melanie., "Quality in Unimode and Mixed-Mode Designs: A Multitrait-Multimethod Approach" 4 (4): 151-164, 2010

    36 Lee, Sunghee., "Propensity Score Adjustment as a Weighting Scheme for Volunteer Panel Web Surveys" 22 (22): 329-349, 2006

    37 Groves, Robert M, "Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys" Wiley 1998

    38 Roberts, Caroline., "Mixing Modes of Data Collection in Surveys: A Methodological Review" ESRC National Centre for Research Methods. 2007

    39 Griffin, Deborah H., "Meeting 21st Century Demographic Needs .Implementing the American Community Survey: Report 2. Demonstrating Survey Quality" U.S. Census Bureau, Economics and Statistics Administration 2002

    40 Sparrow, Nick, "Measuring the Attitudes of the General Public via Internet Polls: An Evaluation" 46 (46): 23-44, 2004

    41 Dillman, Don A., "Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (3rd Edition)" John Wiley & Sons, Inc 2009

    42 de Leeuw, Edith D., "Internet Surveys as Part of a Mixed-Mode Design, In Social and Behavior al Resear ch and the Internet" Routledge 45-76, 2011

    43 Lynn, Peter, "How Representative Can a Multi-Nation Survey Be?, In Measuring Attitudes Cross-Nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey" Sage 33-52, 2007

    44 Martin, Elizabeth, "Guidelines for Designing Questionnaires for Administration in Different Modes" U.S.Census Bureau

    45 D’Agostino, "Estimating and Using Propensity Scores with Partially Missing Data" 95 (95): 749-759, 2000

    46 Valliant, Richard, "Estimating Propensity Adjustments for Volunteer Web Surveys" 40 (40): 105-137, 2011

    47 Rubin, Donald., "Estimating Causal Effects from Large Data Sets Using Propensity Scores" 127 (127): 757-763, 1997

    48 Krug, Steve., "Don't Make Me Think: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability (2nd ed.)" New Riders Press 2005

    49 Taylor, Humphrey., "Does Internet Research Work? Comparing Electronic Survey Results with Telephone Survey" 42 (42): 51-63, 2000

    50 Vannieuwenhuyze, Jorre, "A Method for Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode Surveys" 74 (74): 1027-1045, 2010

    51 Roster, Catherine A., "A Comparison of Response Characteristics from Web and Telephone Surveys" 46 (46): 359-373, 2004

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.67 0.67 0.78
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.7 0.73 1.041 0.22
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼