RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    1980년대 논픽션 양식과 소설 개념의 재편 과정 연구 = A Study on re-conceptualization of novel caused by non-fictional genre in 1980`s

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99968278

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The politics of literature in 1980`s are not limited to the layer of radical message exposed simply on the surface of the text. As the form of writing from the bottom and traditional literary form are conflicted and negotiated, we`ll find the politics in contemporary literature rather than reconstruct the concept of elite ``literature`` considered naturally from the previous period. Especially, existing research literature in the 1980s disclosed limits of not deviating a view of elitism literature, it needs more attention that the tend of setting that ``internal`` and ``external`` side of literature are cut off each other exists. The appearance that Jeon Taeil, Seok Jeongnam write ``novel`` in this awareness of issues provides very important implications. Their texts belong to a form like non-fiction of manipulation in elitism meaning. However, they call the texts ``novel`` and question the concept of the traditional novel. Their questioning is embodied by so-called ``Hakchul`` writers such as Hong Huidam, Bang Hyeonseok, etc. Hong Huidam and Bang Hyeonseok reconstruct the concept of the existing novel by using a strategy to dispose the concept of the canonized novel and a strategy to make writing from the bottom be osmotic pressure to the concept of the traditional novel. This performance is significant in that case that the politics of literature in the 1980s were demonstrated at the point of changing ``literature`` itself.
    번역하기

    The politics of literature in 1980`s are not limited to the layer of radical message exposed simply on the surface of the text. As the form of writing from the bottom and traditional literary form are conflicted and negotiated, we`ll find the politics...

    The politics of literature in 1980`s are not limited to the layer of radical message exposed simply on the surface of the text. As the form of writing from the bottom and traditional literary form are conflicted and negotiated, we`ll find the politics in contemporary literature rather than reconstruct the concept of elite ``literature`` considered naturally from the previous period. Especially, existing research literature in the 1980s disclosed limits of not deviating a view of elitism literature, it needs more attention that the tend of setting that ``internal`` and ``external`` side of literature are cut off each other exists. The appearance that Jeon Taeil, Seok Jeongnam write ``novel`` in this awareness of issues provides very important implications. Their texts belong to a form like non-fiction of manipulation in elitism meaning. However, they call the texts ``novel`` and question the concept of the traditional novel. Their questioning is embodied by so-called ``Hakchul`` writers such as Hong Huidam, Bang Hyeonseok, etc. Hong Huidam and Bang Hyeonseok reconstruct the concept of the existing novel by using a strategy to dispose the concept of the canonized novel and a strategy to make writing from the bottom be osmotic pressure to the concept of the traditional novel. This performance is significant in that case that the politics of literature in the 1980s were demonstrated at the point of changing ``literature`` itself.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 송철순 민주노동열사 추모위원회, "해방의 불꽃으로-고 송철순 열사 추모집" 민주화운동기념사업회,

    2 김대성, "제도의 해체와 확산, 그리고 문학의 정치" 인문학연구, 2011

    3 조영래, "전태일평전" 돌베개, 1991

    4 김원, "여공 1970" 이매진, 2006

    5 천정환, "서발턴은 쓸 수 있는가 : 1970~80년대 민중의 자기재현과 ‘민중문학’의 재평가를 위한 일고" 민족문학사연구 47 (47) : 224 ~ 254, 2011

    6 방현석, "새벽출정" 창작과비평 (봄), 1999

    7 "민주노총 열사추모 홈페이지"

    8 김사인, "민족민중문학론의 쟁점과 전망" 푸른숲, 1989

    9 자유실천문인협의회, "노동의 문학 문학의 새벽" 이삭, 1985

    10 박노해, "광주 무장봉기의 지도자 윤상원 평전" 노동해방문학, 1989

    1 송철순 민주노동열사 추모위원회, "해방의 불꽃으로-고 송철순 열사 추모집" 민주화운동기념사업회,

    2 김대성, "제도의 해체와 확산, 그리고 문학의 정치" 인문학연구, 2011

    3 조영래, "전태일평전" 돌베개, 1991

    4 김원, "여공 1970" 이매진, 2006

    5 천정환, "서발턴은 쓸 수 있는가 : 1970~80년대 민중의 자기재현과 ‘민중문학’의 재평가를 위한 일고" 민족문학사연구 47 (47) : 224 ~ 254, 2011

    6 방현석, "새벽출정" 창작과비평 (봄), 1999

    7 "민주노총 열사추모 홈페이지"

    8 김사인, "민족민중문학론의 쟁점과 전망" 푸른숲, 1989

    9 자유실천문인협의회, "노동의 문학 문학의 새벽" 이삭, 1985

    10 박노해, "광주 무장봉기의 지도자 윤상원 평전" 노동해방문학, 1989

    11 장성규, "1980년대 노동자 문집과 서발턴의 자기 재현 전략" 민족문학사연구 50 (50) : 257 ~ 279, 2012

    12 김성환, "1970년대 논픽션과 소설의 관계 양상 연구 - [신동아] 논픽션 공모를 중심으로" 상허학보 32 : 13 ~ 61, 2011

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼