유럽연합 민사소송절차의 운용원리와 발전방향 = Principles and development of EU civil procedural law

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

EU civil procedure is not belong to the typical type of civil procedure in contrast with traditional civil procedure law. It could rather classified as a kind of dispute resolution in European Union.
Holistic approach on EU dispute resolution system also helpful to understand EU civil procedure and judicial system. That's mainly due to the characteristics of European Union, which is forming legal personality that could be differentiate from international organization, federal states, confederation etc.
The development of EU civil procedure or dispute resolution system could be summarized as follows according to the professor Calliess ; Privatization, Globalization, Europeanization, Digitization. Cross border dispute resolution is also urgent and pressing problems in EU.
To solve or lessen these problems, EU designs a new system like preliminary references, direct action, enforcement action, action for failure to act, action for damage etc. Sources of secondary EU law comprises regulations, directives, decisions, opinions, recommendations, communications, white and green papers, convention and agreements. The problem of international civil procedure is also discuss lively.
The Court of Justice of the European Union(CJEU) plays an important role in forming the principle of Primacy of Union Law. The CJEU itself depicts their role as the motor of EU. The Court of Justice shall consist of one judge from each Member State and be assisted by Advocates-General. The judges and the Advocates-General of the Court of Justice and the Judges of the General Court shall be chosen from persons whose independence is beyond doubt and who satisfy the conditions of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Korea need to understand the change and reform of EU law because Korea-EU FTA officially took effect and EU law could directly valid to Korean trade company. Korea judicial system also need to receive a hint of court reform from EU at the age of system competition.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박상조, "현대국제사법" 한올출판사 2000

2 전기원, "쟁점으로 본 동아시아 협력과 갈등" 도서출판 오름 2008

3 김용훈, "유럽연합의 규범통제제도 -유럽연합 정체성 평가와 남북한 통합에의 함의-" 경인문화사 2012

4 채형복, "영･한대역 리스본 조약" 국제환경규제 기업지원센터 2010

5 최철, "영국법원에서의 Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd. v. Apple Inc. 사건의 쟁점과판단, 애플-삼성 간 소송의 경과 및 앞으로의 전망 –민사소송시스템의관점에서" 2012

6 석광현, "국제사법 해설" 박영사 2013

7 김용진, "국제민사소송전략" 신영사 1997

8 Gralf-Peter Calliess, "Verhandlungen des 70. Deutschen Juristentages, Band ⅠGutachten" C.H. Beck 2014

9 Paolo Biavati, "European civil procedure" Wolters Kluwer 2011

10 Stefaan Voet, "European Collective Redress: A Status Qusestionis" 2014

11 김대순, "EU법론" 삼영사 1995

12 박덕영, "EU법 강의" 박영사 2012

13 Lenaert, "EU procedure Law" Oxford university press 2014

14 Richard Gordon, "EU Law in Judicial Review" Oxford University Press 2014

15 정선주, "2012년 독일 조정법의 내용과 평가" 한국민사소송법학회 16 (16): 411-453, 2012