상담자의 타당화 수준 평가 척도 개발 및 타당화 = Development of the Perceived Validation Scale(PVS)

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Perceived Validation Scale (PVS) was developed and validated to assess counselor's validation level perceived by clients. The concept and the level of validation was suggested by Linehan (1993). A total of 105 preliminary items were selected through in-depth literature review. The contents of the selected items were validated by 2 counseling professionals. The readability of each item was checked. The final 18 items of the PVS were developed, and the psychometric properties of the PVS were examined through the study with 259 actual clients. The PVS demonstrated high level of internal consistency, and the result of factor analysis identified six-factor construct, which was the best fit to the six-levels of the validation model theoretically proposed by Linehan (1993). The validity of the PVS was verified with Outcome Questionnaire 30 (OQ-30), Empathic Understanding subscale (EUS), Counselor Rating Form (CRF-S), Test of negative social exchange (TENSE). Finally, the implication and the future studies of the PVS were discussed.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

Linehan(1997)이 제안한 상담자의 타당화(validation) 수준을 내담자가 평정하는 상담자의 타당화 수준 평가 척도(Perceived Validation Scale: PVS)를 개발하였다. 타당화란 내담자와 내담자의 반응에 내재된 본질적인 의미와 이해가능성, 즉 타당성을 발견하고 이를 내담자에게 전달하는 것으로 정의된다. 문헌 질적 분석을 통해 총 105개의 예비문항을 개발하고, 전문가의 내용타당도 검증을 거친 뒤, 대학생 이상 성인 내담자 259명을 대상으로 예비연구를 실시하여 총 18 문항을 선정하였다. PVS는 내적일관성, 시간적 안정성을 갖추었을 뿐 아니라, Linehan(1997)이 제안한 6요인구조를 지지하였다. 또한, 타당화 수준을 고려하여 생성한 변수 PVS-D는 공감적 이해 소척도(EUS), 상담자 평정척도(CRF-S)의 기존 도구에 비해 상담성과를 보다 잘 설명하였다. PVS개발의 의의와 제한점, 후속 연구에 대한 제언을 논의하였다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 오경희, "초기 상담에서 상담자의 반응의도 전달이 내담자의 의도지각 및 상담의 효율성 평가에 미치는 영향" 서울대학교 1986

2 정방자, "정신역동적 상담과정에서의 상담자와 내담자의 언어반응 변화 분석" 서울대학교 1986

3 Kohut,H, "자기의 분석 in The analysis of the self" 한국심리 치료 연구소 2002

4 Raskin, N. J, "인간중심치료 현대심리치료" 학지사 205-255, 2004

5 Egan,G, "유능한 상담자 in The skilled helper" 학지사 1999

6 Beck,A.T, "우울증의 인지치료 in Cognitive therapy of depression" 학지사 2005

7 홍세희, "구조 방정식 모형에 있어서 적합도 선정기준과 그 근거." 19 : 161-177, 2000

8 박성희, "공감학" 학지사 2004

9 Ruehlman, L. S, "With a little flack from my friend: Development and preliminary validation of the Test of Negative Social Exchange (TENSE)" 3 : 97-104, 1991

10 Linehan,M.M, "Validation and Psychotherapy in Empathy reconsidered:New directions in psychotherapy" American Psychological Association 353-392, 1997

11 Baldwin. S. A, "Untangling the alliance-outcome correlation: Exploring the relative importance of therapist and patient variability in the alliance" 75 (75): 842-852, 2007

12 Truax, C. B., "Toward effecitve counseling and psychotherapy" Aldine 1967

13 Horvath, A. O., "The alliance in Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients" Oxford University Press 37-69, 2002

14 Brownson, C, "The Research Consortium of Counseling and Psychological Sevices in Higher Education"

15 Lambert, M. J, "The Outcome Questionnaire-45 in Use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment" Erlbaum 191-234, 2004

16 DeVellis,R.F, "Scale development: Theory and applications" Sage 2003

17 Patton,M.Q, "Qualitative evaluation and research methods" Sage 1990

18 Oilinsky, D. E, "Precess and outcome in psychotherapy-nocheinmal in Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change" Wiley 270-378, 1994

19 Vermeersch, D. A, "Outcome questionnaire: Is it sensitive to changes in counselling center clients?" 51 : 38-39, 2004

20 Barak, A, "Multidimentional perception of counselor behavior" 22 : 471-476, 1975

21 Lynch, T. R, "Mechanisms of change in dialectical behavior therapy: Theoretical and empirical observations" 62 : 459-480, 2006

22 Bohart, A. C, "Empathy: Where are we and where do we go from here?in Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy" American Psychological Association 419-449, 1997

23 Feshbach,N.D, "Empathy: The formative years implications for clinical practice in Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy" American Psychological Association 33-59, 1997

24 Eagle, M, "Empathy: A psychoanalytic perspective in Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy" American Psychological Association 217-244, 1997

25 Shlien,J, "Empathy in psychotherapy:A vital mechanism? yes.therapist's conceit? all too often.by itself enough? in Empathy reconsidered:New directions in psychotherapy" American Psychological Association 63-80, 1997

26 Barrett-Lennard,G.T, "Dimensions of therapist response as causal factors in therapeutic change" 43 : 1-13, 1962

27 Lafferty, P, "Differences between more and less effective psychotherapist: A study of select therapist variables" 57 : 76-80, 1991

28 Hu, L. T., "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives" 6 : 1-55, 1999

29 Cronbach, L. J, "Construct validity in psychological tests" 52 : 281-302, 1995

30 Linehan,M.M, "Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder" Guilford 1993

31 Franks,C.M, "Behavioral model in Advanced abnormal psychology" Plenum 93-110, 1994

32 Warwar, S, "Advances in theories of change and counseling. in Handbook of counseling psychology" John Wiley & Sons 571-600, 2000

33 Rogers,C.R, "A way of being" Houghton Mifflin 1980

34 Mitchell, K. M, "A reappraisal of the therapeutic effectiveness of accurate empathy, nonpossessive warmth, and genuineness in Effective Psychotherapy" Pergamon 1977