RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    웹기반 원격학습자의 학업성취도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구 -수도권지역 대학생 원격학습자를 중심으로- = Factors Influencing the Academic Achievements of Web-based Distance Learners -The Case of Capital Region`s Undergraduate Distance Learners-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75434612

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study were 1) to identify the factors and their influences affecting the academic achievements of Web-based distance learners, and 2) to figure out which factors identified were influencing to the learners` achievements depending on learners` characteristics(gender, grade, and speciality areas). Three-hundred sixty undergraduate students who took at least one Web-based distance course and that the university were located in Capital region(Seoul, Gyeonggi Province, and Incheon metropolitan city) were surveyed. Based on the results of literature reviews, the questionnaire which consisted of seven categories, 53 items was developed. The results were as follows: First, six factors influencing distance learners` performance were tools/resources, physical environments, skills/knowledge, incentives, inherent ability, and organizational systems. In addition, incentives(β=.499), skills/knowledge(β=.256), and inherent ability(β=.181) were directly affecting to the learners` academic achievements. Second, there were statistically significant differences between male distance learners[incentives(β=.427), organizational systems(β=.250), inherent ability(β=.212), and skills/knowledge(β=.192)] and female ones[incentives(β=.546), skills/knowledge(β=.326), and tools/resources(β=.211)] on the factors influencing their academic achievements. Third, there were statistically significant differences by grade[freshmen: inherent ability(β=.305); sophomore: incentives(β=.473), inherent ability(β=.260), and skills/knowledge(β=.232); junior: incentives(β=.510) and skills/knowledge(β=.372); senior: incentives(β=.638), tools/resources(β=.280), and physical environments(β=.264)] in terms of the factors influencing their academic achievements. Fourth, there were also statistically significant differences by speciality areas[humane studies division including humane studies, social studies, and education: incentives(β=.413), skills/knowledge(β=.245), inherent ability(β=.186), and physical environments(β=.185); natural science division including natural science, engineering, and medical studies: incentives(β=.491), skills/knowledge(β=.219), and inherent ability(β=.200)] in terms of the factors influencing their academic achievements. In conclusion, this study found that various factors were differently affecting to the undergraduate distance learners` academic achievements depending on the learners` characteristics(gender, grade, and speciality areas) and the degrees of the influences were also differed by the characteristics.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study were 1) to identify the factors and their influences affecting the academic achievements of Web-based distance learners, and 2) to figure out which factors identified were influencing to the learners` achievements depending o...

    The purpose of this study were 1) to identify the factors and their influences affecting the academic achievements of Web-based distance learners, and 2) to figure out which factors identified were influencing to the learners` achievements depending on learners` characteristics(gender, grade, and speciality areas). Three-hundred sixty undergraduate students who took at least one Web-based distance course and that the university were located in Capital region(Seoul, Gyeonggi Province, and Incheon metropolitan city) were surveyed. Based on the results of literature reviews, the questionnaire which consisted of seven categories, 53 items was developed. The results were as follows: First, six factors influencing distance learners` performance were tools/resources, physical environments, skills/knowledge, incentives, inherent ability, and organizational systems. In addition, incentives(β=.499), skills/knowledge(β=.256), and inherent ability(β=.181) were directly affecting to the learners` academic achievements. Second, there were statistically significant differences between male distance learners[incentives(β=.427), organizational systems(β=.250), inherent ability(β=.212), and skills/knowledge(β=.192)] and female ones[incentives(β=.546), skills/knowledge(β=.326), and tools/resources(β=.211)] on the factors influencing their academic achievements. Third, there were statistically significant differences by grade[freshmen: inherent ability(β=.305); sophomore: incentives(β=.473), inherent ability(β=.260), and skills/knowledge(β=.232); junior: incentives(β=.510) and skills/knowledge(β=.372); senior: incentives(β=.638), tools/resources(β=.280), and physical environments(β=.264)] in terms of the factors influencing their academic achievements. Fourth, there were also statistically significant differences by speciality areas[humane studies division including humane studies, social studies, and education: incentives(β=.413), skills/knowledge(β=.245), inherent ability(β=.186), and physical environments(β=.185); natural science division including natural science, engineering, and medical studies: incentives(β=.491), skills/knowledge(β=.219), and inherent ability(β=.200)] in terms of the factors influencing their academic achievements. In conclusion, this study found that various factors were differently affecting to the undergraduate distance learners` academic achievements depending on the learners` characteristics(gender, grade, and speciality areas) and the degrees of the influences were also differed by the characteristics.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼