RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    학습용 전자책의 텍스트 길이와 정보탐색 유형이 시선고정 시간, 인지부하, 학습이해도에 미치는 영향 = The Effects of Line Length and Information Seeking in E-Book for Learning on Eye-fixation Time, Cognitive Load, and Comprehension

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99888154

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of line length and information seeking strategy on eye-fixation time, cognitive load, and comprehension score. The participants of this study were twenty-six college students(female=19 and male=7). The independent variables were text line lengths (long=50 character per line vs. short=25 character per line) and types of information seeking strategies (scanning vs. skimming). The dependent variables were eye-fixation time, cognitive load factor, and comprehension scores. For the eye-fixation time, the eye tracking method was applied for this study. The participants were randomly assigned either long line or short line format of expository text. The participants were asked to perform two reading tasks: Scanning and Skimming. Scanning task was to find out specific concept or keyword, and skimming task was to summarize the passage. For the eye-fixation time there were significant differences between types of information seeking strategies. When the participants were asked to perform a skimming task, their eye-fixation time was significantly increased compared to scanning task conditions. Further, the participants` eye-fixation time showed significant interaction effect between types of information seeking strategies and line lengths. This result revealed that line length can be an important design factor when a learner is reading e-book for learning. There was a significant difference of cognitive load factors in skimming condition. The participants with short line length condition showed higher perception of usefulness. There was no significant difference by comprehension scores. The study made three suggestions for those who are designing e-books for studin.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of line length and information seeking strategy on eye-fixation time, cognitive load, and comprehension score. The participants of this study were twenty-six college students(female=19 and male=7). T...

    The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of line length and information seeking strategy on eye-fixation time, cognitive load, and comprehension score. The participants of this study were twenty-six college students(female=19 and male=7). The independent variables were text line lengths (long=50 character per line vs. short=25 character per line) and types of information seeking strategies (scanning vs. skimming). The dependent variables were eye-fixation time, cognitive load factor, and comprehension scores. For the eye-fixation time, the eye tracking method was applied for this study. The participants were randomly assigned either long line or short line format of expository text. The participants were asked to perform two reading tasks: Scanning and Skimming. Scanning task was to find out specific concept or keyword, and skimming task was to summarize the passage. For the eye-fixation time there were significant differences between types of information seeking strategies. When the participants were asked to perform a skimming task, their eye-fixation time was significantly increased compared to scanning task conditions. Further, the participants` eye-fixation time showed significant interaction effect between types of information seeking strategies and line lengths. This result revealed that line length can be an important design factor when a learner is reading e-book for learning. There was a significant difference of cognitive load factors in skimming condition. The participants with short line length condition showed higher perception of usefulness. There was no significant difference by comprehension scores. The study made three suggestions for those who are designing e-books for studin.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이정엽, "특집 : 예술과 테크놀러지; 전자책은 글을 쓰고 읽는 방식을 어떻게 바꾸는가?" 18 (18): 25-30, 2011

    2 류지헌, "텍스트의 줄 길이와 근접성 원리가 과제유형에 따라서 인지부하에 미치는 영향" 한국교육공학회 27 (27): 401-425, 2011

    3 성대훈, "전자책 환상과 오해. Kmobile 전자책 대폭발: 2012 성공모델을 찾아라"

    4 곽승진, "전자책 단말기의 사용성 평가에 관한 실험적 연구" 한국정보관리학회 28 (28): 313-333, 2011

    5 신종현, "읽기 형태, 줄 길이, 줄 간격이 한글 웹 문서의 가독성에 미치는 영향" 대한산업공학회 29 (29): 197-205, 2003

    6 권효정, "웹 정보시각화를 위한 비주얼서치 기반의 시지각 패턴 연구" 부산대학교 대학원 2011

    7 류지헌, "과제유형과 화면설계방식이 인지부하요인의 과제난이도 지각과 정신적 노력에 미치는 영향" 한국교육공학회 26 (26): 1-23, 2010

    8 서지혜, "‘검지 독서族’ 미는 재미가 쏠쏠하다"

    9 Walton, E. W., "Why undergraduate students choose to use e-books"

    10 Ahmed, F., "Why read if you can skim: towards enabling faster screen reading" ACM 39-, 2012

    1 이정엽, "특집 : 예술과 테크놀러지; 전자책은 글을 쓰고 읽는 방식을 어떻게 바꾸는가?" 18 (18): 25-30, 2011

    2 류지헌, "텍스트의 줄 길이와 근접성 원리가 과제유형에 따라서 인지부하에 미치는 영향" 한국교육공학회 27 (27): 401-425, 2011

    3 성대훈, "전자책 환상과 오해. Kmobile 전자책 대폭발: 2012 성공모델을 찾아라"

    4 곽승진, "전자책 단말기의 사용성 평가에 관한 실험적 연구" 한국정보관리학회 28 (28): 313-333, 2011

    5 신종현, "읽기 형태, 줄 길이, 줄 간격이 한글 웹 문서의 가독성에 미치는 영향" 대한산업공학회 29 (29): 197-205, 2003

    6 권효정, "웹 정보시각화를 위한 비주얼서치 기반의 시지각 패턴 연구" 부산대학교 대학원 2011

    7 류지헌, "과제유형과 화면설계방식이 인지부하요인의 과제난이도 지각과 정신적 노력에 미치는 영향" 한국교육공학회 26 (26): 1-23, 2010

    8 서지혜, "‘검지 독서族’ 미는 재미가 쏠쏠하다"

    9 Walton, E. W., "Why undergraduate students choose to use e-books"

    10 Ahmed, F., "Why read if you can skim: towards enabling faster screen reading" ACM 39-, 2012

    11 van den Broek, P., "Using texts in science education : Cognitive processes and knowledge representation" 328 (328): 453-456, 2010

    12 Krashen, S., "The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom" The Alemany Press 1983

    13 van den Broek, P., "The effects of readers' goals on inference generation and memory for texts" 29 : 1081-1087, 2001

    14 Boot, W. R., "Stable individual differences in search strategy? : The effects of task demands and motivational factors on scanning strategy in visual search" 9 (9): 1-16, 2009

    15 신희숙, "Skimming과 Scanning을 중심으로 한 읽기능력 신장방안" 1 (1): 155-160, 1999

    16 Stuyven, E., "Saccadic eye movements under conditions of cognitive load" 104 : 69-85, 2000

    17 Linderholm, T., "Reading with Purpose" 36 (36): 70-80, 2006

    18 Cromley, J. G., "Reading comprehension of scientific text : A domain-specific test of the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension" 102 (102): 687-700, 2010

    19 Hyönä, J., "Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text : Evidence from eye fixation patterns" 94 (94): 44-55, 2002

    20 Granka, L. A., "Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in WWW search" ACM 478-479, 2004

    21 Őquist, G., "Eye movement study of reading on a mobile device using the page and RSVP text presentation formats, In Mobile human-computer interaction - Mobile HCI 2004" Springer 108-119, 2004

    22 Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., "Electronic versus traditional print textbooks : A comparison study on the influence of university students' learning" 63 : 259-266, 2013

    23 Linderholm, T., "Differences in low and high workingmemory capacity readers' cognitive and metacognitive processing patterns as a function of reading for different purposes" 29 : 61-85, 2008

    24 Olsen, A., "Comparing different eye tracking cues when using the retrospective think aloud method in usability testing" British Computer Society 45-53, 2010

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.66 1.66 1.64
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.73 1.75 1.963 0.27
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼