RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    조선의 초대 주미조선공사 파견과 친청노선 강화 = Joseon’s First Dispatching of a Korean Legation in the U.S., and Joseon’s reinforcement of the Pro-Qing policy

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101850563

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Since the liberation, members of the Korean historical society have continued their efforts to purge all historical studies of certain remnants from the colonial days. In the process, imperialist invasion of the Korean peninsula, and the foundation of a nationalist state became the two topics that collected most of the scholars’ attention and devotion. Historical studies of Korean modern days maintained a perspective viewing those days and the Joseon government’s diplomatic policies through two concepts : ‘invasion’ and ‘resistance.’
    In 2015, after 70 years have passed since the liberation of 1945, scholars are starting to examine those days from the perspectives of the people who actually lived the time. Previous studies concentrated upon examining the actions of the Joseon government, which supposedly tried to resist imperialist invasions and endeavored to maintain its own independence. These studies even expanded their examination to East Asian politics and diplomacy in general, trying to break free from the old perspective, viewing this period with the only two key words mentioned above, invasion and resistance. Yet the inside of Joseon, the actual process in which a policy would have been devised and employed, never garnered the attention it deserved. As a result, the changes that occurred in the Joseon government’s diplomatic policies in the 1880s were never fully examined. It was always assumed that the Joseon government was playing the defense all the time, and all policies of Joseon was a product of such passive stance. The reforms which were in progress since the early 1880s were never fully appreciated.
    So in this article, the direction of such reforms, which continued up until 1894, is examined. Added to that is an analysis of the Joseon government’s diplomatic policy, of how it diverged, and how it all came together. Hopefully a correlation between domestic politics and diplomatic initiatives in the late 1880s could be determined and suggested.
    번역하기

    Since the liberation, members of the Korean historical society have continued their efforts to purge all historical studies of certain remnants from the colonial days. In the process, imperialist invasion of the Korean peninsula, and the foundation of...

    Since the liberation, members of the Korean historical society have continued their efforts to purge all historical studies of certain remnants from the colonial days. In the process, imperialist invasion of the Korean peninsula, and the foundation of a nationalist state became the two topics that collected most of the scholars’ attention and devotion. Historical studies of Korean modern days maintained a perspective viewing those days and the Joseon government’s diplomatic policies through two concepts : ‘invasion’ and ‘resistance.’
    In 2015, after 70 years have passed since the liberation of 1945, scholars are starting to examine those days from the perspectives of the people who actually lived the time. Previous studies concentrated upon examining the actions of the Joseon government, which supposedly tried to resist imperialist invasions and endeavored to maintain its own independence. These studies even expanded their examination to East Asian politics and diplomacy in general, trying to break free from the old perspective, viewing this period with the only two key words mentioned above, invasion and resistance. Yet the inside of Joseon, the actual process in which a policy would have been devised and employed, never garnered the attention it deserved. As a result, the changes that occurred in the Joseon government’s diplomatic policies in the 1880s were never fully examined. It was always assumed that the Joseon government was playing the defense all the time, and all policies of Joseon was a product of such passive stance. The reforms which were in progress since the early 1880s were never fully appreciated.
    So in this article, the direction of such reforms, which continued up until 1894, is examined. Added to that is an analysis of the Joseon government’s diplomatic policy, of how it diverged, and how it all came together. Hopefully a correlation between domestic politics and diplomatic initiatives in the late 1880s could be determined and suggested.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 머리말
    • 1. 주미전권공사 파견을 둘러싼 외교노선 갈등 : 연미와 친청
    • 2. 연미노선의 굴절과 친청노선의 강화
    • 맺음말
    • 참고문헌
    • 머리말
    • 1. 주미전권공사 파견을 둘러싼 외교노선 갈등 : 연미와 친청
    • 2. 연미노선의 굴절과 친청노선의 강화
    • 맺음말
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 최문형, "한국을 둘러싼 제국주의 열강의 각축" 지식산업사 2001

    2 손정숙, "한국 근대 주한 미국공사 연구(1883~1905)" 한국사학 2005

    3 최덕수, "조약으로 본 한국근대사" 열린책들 2010

    4 민경현, "수교와 교섭의 시기 한러관계" 선인 2008

    5 송병기, "소위 「三端」에 대하여 -근대 韓淸關係史의 한 연구-" 6 : 1972

    6 민경현, "러시아와 한국" 서울 2010

    7 사쿠라이 료주, "다시 보는 동아시아 근대사" 까치 2011

    8 이민식, "근대한미관계사" 백산자료원 2001

    9 김도형, "근대 한국의 문명전환과 개혁론 -유교 비판과 변통-" 지식산업사 2014

    10 문일평, "韓美五十年史" 探求堂 1974

    1 최문형, "한국을 둘러싼 제국주의 열강의 각축" 지식산업사 2001

    2 손정숙, "한국 근대 주한 미국공사 연구(1883~1905)" 한국사학 2005

    3 최덕수, "조약으로 본 한국근대사" 열린책들 2010

    4 민경현, "수교와 교섭의 시기 한러관계" 선인 2008

    5 송병기, "소위 「三端」에 대하여 -근대 韓淸關係史의 한 연구-" 6 : 1972

    6 민경현, "러시아와 한국" 서울 2010

    7 사쿠라이 료주, "다시 보는 동아시아 근대사" 까치 2011

    8 이민식, "근대한미관계사" 백산자료원 2001

    9 김도형, "근대 한국의 문명전환과 개혁론 -유교 비판과 변통-" 지식산업사 2014

    10 문일평, "韓美五十年史" 探求堂 1974

    11 신기석, "韓末外交史硏究 : 淸韓宗屬關係를 中心으로" 一潮閣 1967

    12 구선희, "韓國 近代 對淸政策史 硏究" 혜안 1999

    13 김원모, "開化期 韓美 交涉關係史" 단대출판부 2003

    14 박일근, "近代韓美外交史" 博友社 1968

    15 林明德, "袁世凱與朝鮮" 中央硏究院近代史硏究所 1970

    16 연갑수, "蓉菴 金炳始(1832~1898)의 삶과 현실인식" 조선시대사학회 (44) : 103-136, 2008

    17 정경민, "朝鮮의 初代 駐美全權公使 派遣(1887-1889)과 淸國의 對應" 고려대학교 2012

    18 岡本隆司, "屬國と自主のあいだ : 近代淸韓關係と東アジアの命運" 名古屋大學出版會 2004

    19 권혁수, "19世紀末 韓中 關係史 硏究 : 李鴻章의 朝鮮認識와 政策을 中心으로" 백산자료원 2000

    20 小林隆夫, "19世紀イギリス外交と東アジア" 彩流社 2012

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-10-05 학술지명변경 한글명 : 역사와 현실 -> 역사와 현실
    외국어명 : 미등록 -> YŎKSA WA HYŎNSIL
    KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1998-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.91 0.91 0.87
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.87 0.92 1.68 0.36
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼