조선시대의 교화와 형정 = The Joseon Government's efforts toward a Governance of Enlightenment, and Its Penal Administration

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Joseon dynasty, which chose Neo-Confucianism as its new ruling ideology, preferred a ruling based upon protocols and enlightenment, to a ruling based upon law and punishment. This led to a philosophy that believed a generous ruling based upon moral values should be primarily employed, and legal or penal institutions should only be used as instruments to complement such generous ruling(德主刑輔).
The characteristic of the penal administration in premodern societies is that the level of punishments actually differed due to differences' in the recipients' social status. The belief that everyone is equal in front of the law only came to existence in the modern period when the social-class system was abolished. This means that a certain form of legalism completely of its own was only established after the premodern era ended, and the rather Confucian perspective to view penal administration, which was basically 'values first, punishments second,' disappeared at the time as well.
During the Joseon dynasty period, this perspective and philosophy was never abandoned, yet the status of moral ruling and legal ruling continued to change over the years. As time went on, the sense of obligation toward a generous ruling based upon values and protocols got weakened, and a sense of need for a ruling based upon legalism grew stronger and stronger. And in the middle and latter periods of the 18th century, during the reigns of kings Yeongjo and Jeongjo, both sides came to be equally appreciated(禮法?重).

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 머리말
• 1. 교화 중심 통치체제의 확립
• 2. 형정이 중시되는 사회로의 전환
• 맺음말
• 참고문헌
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 장국화, "중국법률사상사, In 대우학술총서" 아카넷 2003

2 김인걸, "조선후기 향촌사회 변동에 관한 연구 ‒18,19세기 ‘향권’담당층의 변화를 중심으로" 서울대학교 1991

3 조윤선, "조선후기 소송연구" 국학자료원 2002

4 한상권, "조선후기 사회와 소원제도" 일조각 1996

5 김성우, "조선중기 국가와 사족" 역사비평사 2000

6 한국역사연구회 19세기 정치사연구반, "조선정치사 (하)" 청년사 1990

7 한국역사연구회 조선시기 사회사 연구반, "조선은 지방을 어떻게 지배했는가, In 대우학술총서" 2000

8 김현영, "조선시대의 양반과 향촌사회" 집문당 1999

9 정진영, "조선시대 향촌사회사" 한길사 1998

10 한상권, "조선시대 소송과 외지부(外知部) ― 1560년 「경주부결송입안(慶州府決訟立案)｣ 분석 ―" 한국역사연구회 (69) : 255-292, 2008

11 한상권, "조선시대 법전 편찬의 흐름과 각종 법률서의 성격" 13 : 1994

12 이해준, "조선시기 촌락사회사" 민족문화사 1996

13 한상권, "순암 안정복의 사회사상" 17 : 1987

14 이태진, "사림파의 유향소 복립운동(상)" 34 : 1972

15 구덕회, "대명률과 조선 중기 형률상의 신분 차별" 한국역사연구회 (65) : 59-88, 2007

16 박병호, "韓國法制史攷" 법문사 1974

17 范忠信, "中國法律文化探究‒情理法과 中國人" 일조각 1996

18 심재우, "≪審理錄≫ 연구" 서울대학교 2005

19 심희기, "18세기의 형사사법제도 개혁" 20 : 1997

20 심재우, "18세기 옥송의 성격과 형정운영의 변화" 34 : 1995

21 이태진, "17, 18세기 향도조직의 분화와 두레발생" 67 : 1989

22 한상권, "16·17세기 향약의 기구와 성격" 58 : 1984