RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    플레처의 집단책임론에 대한 비판적 재론 = Rethinking Fletcher`s Collective Guilt Theory

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A77040523

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Global financial crisis has arrived, which attacked all the world`s economy and made it down. Naturally diverse reflective arguments on economic and legal liberalism have been rising nowadays. In order to regulate and control the corporation`s abuse of power, we need to examine the theory of collective guilt proposed by George P. Fletcher in his famous book the Romantics at War(2002). In his book, Fletcher argued that in some conditions, not only an actor but also the collective entity surrounding him is guilty. For example, Nazi Germany is guilty for pogrom and the Al-Qaeda is also guilty for 9.11. He called this kind of guilt, the collective guilt. However, there are some critical comments about collective guilt theory made by Herbert Morris. He argues firstly, it is unclear to him how much of a contribution the Romantic-Liberal distinction makes to the issues raised by collective guilt, and secondly, it is also unclear what inferences are permissible from collective guilt to the guilt of individual members of the collective. Finally, he criticizes the function of collective guilt which makes it possible distribution between collective and individual guilt, because if it is possible, too many mitigating factors might be taken into account. I defended Fletcher`s theory of collective guilt from all these critical comments. From his view, we can derive very important conclusions necessary to control appropriately the corporations. In certain conditions, in that the internal cohesion between an actor and the collective entity is strong enough for him to regard himself as the representative of whole entity, the collective entity can be culpable. Similarly, if there are the same conditions between a member of corporations and the corporation itself, the corporation can be culpable. In other words, Fletcher`s theory of collective guilt can be applied to reconstruct corporate criminal liability and thus supply us with legal tools that make it possible to treat corporations as criminal actors.
    번역하기

    Global financial crisis has arrived, which attacked all the world`s economy and made it down. Naturally diverse reflective arguments on economic and legal liberalism have been rising nowadays. In order to regulate and control the corporation`s abuse o...

    Global financial crisis has arrived, which attacked all the world`s economy and made it down. Naturally diverse reflective arguments on economic and legal liberalism have been rising nowadays. In order to regulate and control the corporation`s abuse of power, we need to examine the theory of collective guilt proposed by George P. Fletcher in his famous book the Romantics at War(2002). In his book, Fletcher argued that in some conditions, not only an actor but also the collective entity surrounding him is guilty. For example, Nazi Germany is guilty for pogrom and the Al-Qaeda is also guilty for 9.11. He called this kind of guilt, the collective guilt. However, there are some critical comments about collective guilt theory made by Herbert Morris. He argues firstly, it is unclear to him how much of a contribution the Romantic-Liberal distinction makes to the issues raised by collective guilt, and secondly, it is also unclear what inferences are permissible from collective guilt to the guilt of individual members of the collective. Finally, he criticizes the function of collective guilt which makes it possible distribution between collective and individual guilt, because if it is possible, too many mitigating factors might be taken into account. I defended Fletcher`s theory of collective guilt from all these critical comments. From his view, we can derive very important conclusions necessary to control appropriately the corporations. In certain conditions, in that the internal cohesion between an actor and the collective entity is strong enough for him to regard himself as the representative of whole entity, the collective entity can be culpable. Similarly, if there are the same conditions between a member of corporations and the corporation itself, the corporation can be culpable. In other words, Fletcher`s theory of collective guilt can be applied to reconstruct corporate criminal liability and thus supply us with legal tools that make it possible to treat corporations as criminal actors.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼