한국어 쓰기 능력 평가 방안- 종합적 채점과 분석적 채점 결과를 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Chungsook Kim, 2010. 6. 30. A Study on the Assessment of Writing Proficiency in Korean: Focus on the Result of Comprehensive and Analytic Scoring. Bilingual Research 43, 81-99. The purpose of this study is to find the mean score for Korean learners’ writing proficiency, objectively and reliably, by comparing the result of holistic and analytic scoring. To this ends, 10experienced teachers are asked to score 10 Korean learners' writings using holistic and analytic analysis. In the next stage, each score is compared and analyzed. The following are the results: First in order to result in objective and reliable assessment, analytic scoring is more suitable than holistic scoring which are affected by emotional factors and raters’ preconceived notions. Secondly,analytic scoring can assess low-rated writings in a more objective and reliable way. Lastly analytic scoring is able to shed light on the shortcomings of writers’ proficiency. In other words, analytic scoring could assess sub-skills which have a different developmental stage and would confirm there is a washback effect in writing education. (Korea University)

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김정숙, "한국어능력시험의 등급별 합격 점수 및 채점 기준 설정방안 연구" 한국교육과정평가원 2005

2 이영식, "한국어 말하기 시험의 유형 및 채점 기준 설정을 위한 기초 연구" 국제한국어교육학회 15 (15): 207-228, 2004

3 김유정, "한국어 능력 평가 연구-숙달도 평가를 중심으로-" 고려대학교 대학원 1999

4 이은하, "학문 목적 한국어 학습자의 쓰기 수행 평가를 위한 분석적 채점척도 개발" 이화여자대학교 대학원 2007

5 Brown,H.D, "Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices" Longman 2004

6 Bachman,L.F, "Fundamental Consideration in Language Testing" Oxford University Press 1990