한국전쟁기 유엔군의 피난민 인식과 정책 = UN Army's Refugee Cognition and Policy in Korean War

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In official war history of Korean War, refuge is utmost important topic to be discussed. However, unfortunately, researchers have tended to only describe a situation of refuge-refugee's suffering and misery-very rough stage and not wholly understandable. Even more, refuge has been toyed, captured within the Anti-Communist mythic rhetoric, as a sort of quest for freedom, like ‘exodus’ from horrible Communism in North Korea, as an evidence justifying an orthodoxy of ‘Republic of Korea’ and Liberalism and revealing an monstrous invasion from Communism. The purpose of this thesis is to expose characters of Korean War and re-understand ‘relation between nation and people’ through focusing on refuge. For this direction, this thesis are centered on various experience undergone by refugees in the time of UN army's refugee cognition and polices.
Just after an outbreak of Korean War, Rheesyngman government thrown by its people and thereafter, people left behind could not help being refugees. Even if the refugees were people of their nation, they were threatened to prove whether they were ‘rebellious element’ or not constantly. If they could prove themselves innocent ideologically and sanitarily in this harsh surveillance and control, they barely became an object to aid. On the other hand, if they could not, no one guarantee their safety. According to Rheesyngman government's expression for them, they left as ‘sacrifice for vitory’.
Unfortunately, UN army's attitude on them was not so different. UN army defined refugees as an outcast from their own hometown so that they differentiate the native residents in local area and the refugees. Therefore, we cannot identify refugee with other simple concepts; ‘war victim’ or ‘residual needy’. Refugees, since they were not the native, were enforced to prove their identity and exposed to strict controls and surveillance. Also, there was a ‘lethal force’ to refugees who did not follow the ‘movement restriction phere ’ and disturbed UN's military strategies. Even, the army did not avoid to strafe and bombard indiscriminately towards them. Moreoem. Mone of US division commander regarded refugee as ‘fair game’. In this context Mobserving the humanitarian guideline was surely easycriminaignored in clash with military vantnes and demands. The reason why the humanitarian relief program could hadvantnekept was that the program matvisd or, at least, went along to military purpose. This ‘purpose’ may based on the commands from UNC. To see this circumstance, we should cognize the severe damage and victim of refugees as ‘methodical destruction’, not as ‘collateral damage’ argued by UN army.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정구도, "한국전쟁기의 미8군의 피난민 통제정책" 노근리평화연구소 2007

2 양영조, "한국전쟁과 동북아국가정책 In: 남북한 피난민 상황과 피난민 대책" 선인 2007

3 신오성, "한국전쟁 전후의 보건의료에 대한 연구: 1945-59 한국전쟁기를 중심으로" 서울대학교

4 국방부, "한국전란 1년지" C49-, 1951

5 지수걸, "한국의 근대와 공주사람들" 공주문화원 390-391, 1999

6 박명림, "한국 1950, 전쟁과 평화" 나남 144-, 2002

7 서덕순, "피난실기" 1950

8 "조선일보, 서울신문, 1948.6.4."

9 "조선일보, 1950.12.16."

10 서중석, "조봉암과 1950년대(하)" 786-, 2000

11 김학재, "정부수립후 국가감시체제의 형성과정" 서울대학교 2004

12 김동춘, "전쟁과 사회" 돌베개 2000

13 부산일보사, "임시수도 천일(하)" 217-, 1984

14 "서울신문, 1950.12.13."

15 "부산일보, 1950.7.25."

16 Mossman, Billy C, "밀물과 썰물" 대륙연구소출판부 1995

17 "민주신보, 1951.1.18."

18 "민주신보, 1951.1.16."

19 "민주신보, 1950.8.26."

20 "민주신보, 1950.8.13."

21 중앙일보사, "민족의 증언 4" 중앙일보사 50-56, 1983

22 중앙일보사, "민족의 증언 3" 중앙일보사 132-134, 1983

23 군사편찬연구소, "미국무부 한국 국내상황 관련문서 XV: 한국전쟁 자료총서 53" 624-631, 1999

24 "동아일보, 1951.1.21."

25 "동아일보, 1950.12.7."

26 "동아일보, 1950.12.17."

27 "동아일보, 1950.12.13."

28 "동아일보, 1950.10.7."

29 "동아일보, 1948.11.14"

30 최상훈, "노근리다리" 잉걸 2003

31 대한민국 국회사무처, "국회사-제헌국회ㆍ2대국회ㆍ3대국회" 350-, 1971

32 국회도서관 입법조사국, "국제연합 한국통일부흥위원단 보고서(1951ㆍ1952ㆍ1953)" 90-, 1965

33 "경제신문, 1950.7.15."

34 "경제신문, 1950.7.11."

35 Shaw, Martin, "What is Genocide?" Polity 118-119, 2007

36 "Operational Report(1950.7.19-7.30)" 1950

37 Conway-Lanz, Sahr, "NoGunRi and Issues of Orders" 노근리평화연구소 27-, 2007

38 Conway-Lanz, Sahr, "No Gun Ri and the Issue of Orders" 노근리평화연구소 25-26, 2007

39 "New York Times 1950.9.1"

40 US Department of the Army, "Inspector General, No Gun Ri Review"

41 "Historical Report(Narrative Report)" 25th Infantry Division

42 Conway-Lanz, Sahr, "Collateral Damage: Americans, Noncombatant Immunity, and Atrocity after World War II" 166-, 2006

43 Conway-Lanz, Sahr, "Collateral Damage" Rouledge 2006

44 J. P. Powhida, "Civilian Control in South Korea"

45 Conway-Lanz, Sahr, "Beyond No Gun Ri: Refugees and the United States Military in the Korean War" 29 (29): 2005