RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    소득재분배정책이 양극화와 소득불평등 완화에 미치는 영향에 관한 국가간 비교연구 = Effects of the Redistribution Policies on Resolving Income Inequality and Bi-polarization: A Comparative Study

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82491580

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Based on the idea that bi-polarization of income is different from economic inequality measured by Gini coefficient, we examine the effects of taxation and public transfer on income bi-polarization. Our analysis based on the LIS(Luxembourg Income Study) data reveals that redistributive effects of policies vary to the type of welfare states. In the market-oriented English-speaking countries, redistribution policies do not work quite well for resolving bi-polarization, while those policies contribute to reduce bi-polarization as well as income inequality in the western and the northern Europe. We observe that public transfer has greater effects than taxation in the most of the OECD countries. Public transfer focusing on the poorest poor is not very effective, while universalism covering middle class people is an important feature for effective redistribution policies.
    번역하기

    Based on the idea that bi-polarization of income is different from economic inequality measured by Gini coefficient, we examine the effects of taxation and public transfer on income bi-polarization. Our analysis based on the LIS(Luxembourg Income Stud...

    Based on the idea that bi-polarization of income is different from economic inequality measured by Gini coefficient, we examine the effects of taxation and public transfer on income bi-polarization. Our analysis based on the LIS(Luxembourg Income Study) data reveals that redistributive effects of policies vary to the type of welfare states. In the market-oriented English-speaking countries, redistribution policies do not work quite well for resolving bi-polarization, while those policies contribute to reduce bi-polarization as well as income inequality in the western and the northern Europe. We observe that public transfer has greater effects than taxation in the most of the OECD countries. Public transfer focusing on the poorest poor is not very effective, while universalism covering middle class people is an important feature for effective redistribution policies.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼