RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS

    좋은 의사'의 특성 규명을 위한 기초 연구 = A Preliminary Study for Exploring the Attributes of being a "Good Doctor"

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104018444

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Purpose: Our understanding of the characteristics that make a ‘good doctor’ is continually changing. The aim of this study is to identify the attributes deemed important for being a ‘good doctor’ and to examine to what extent doctors actually possess them.
    Methods: A list of characteristics of a good doctor was generated from literature review and from opinions from medical education experts, a focus group of medical students and a pilot survey of patients. An inventory comprising 33 statements was administered to 598 medical students, 145 faculty, 164 primary care physicians and 85 patients.
    Results: All participants regarded ‘accurate diagnosis and treatment’ as the most important attribute for being a ‘good doctor’ and ‘keeping up-to-date’ as the second important attribute. Empathy towards patients, continuing professional development(CPD), kind manners towards patients were also regarded as important. There was a discrepancy between perceived importance and competency in the areas of communication skills, health advocacy and social contribution according to the participating groups.
    Conclusion: Excellence in clinical ability was identified as the most important attribute of a ‘good doctor’. Compassion and CPD were also identified as important characteristics. More sophisticated studies are needed to further explore the attributes of a ‘good doctor’ for our society.
    번역하기

    Purpose: Our understanding of the characteristics that make a ‘good doctor’ is continually changing. The aim of this study is to identify the attributes deemed important for being a ‘good doctor’ and to examine to what extent doctors actually ...

    Purpose: Our understanding of the characteristics that make a ‘good doctor’ is continually changing. The aim of this study is to identify the attributes deemed important for being a ‘good doctor’ and to examine to what extent doctors actually possess them.
    Methods: A list of characteristics of a good doctor was generated from literature review and from opinions from medical education experts, a focus group of medical students and a pilot survey of patients. An inventory comprising 33 statements was administered to 598 medical students, 145 faculty, 164 primary care physicians and 85 patients.
    Results: All participants regarded ‘accurate diagnosis and treatment’ as the most important attribute for being a ‘good doctor’ and ‘keeping up-to-date’ as the second important attribute. Empathy towards patients, continuing professional development(CPD), kind manners towards patients were also regarded as important. There was a discrepancy between perceived importance and competency in the areas of communication skills, health advocacy and social contribution according to the participating groups.
    Conclusion: Excellence in clinical ability was identified as the most important attribute of a ‘good doctor’. Compassion and CPD were also identified as important characteristics. More sophisticated studies are needed to further explore the attributes of a ‘good doctor’ for our society.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Fones, "“What makes a good doctor?”-views of the medical profession and the public in setting priorities for medical education" 39 : 537-542, 1998

    2 Leahy, "What makes a good doctor? a cross sectional survey of public opinion" 96 : 38-41, 2003

    3 Abu-Hilal, "What makes a good doctor in the 21st century? a qualitative study" 67 : 375-377, 2006

    4 Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, "Skills for the new millennium: report of the societal needs working group CanMEDS 2000 Project" 29 : 206-261, 1996

    5 General Medical Council, "Recommendation on undergraduate medical education" 1993

    6 Association of American Medical College, "Learning objectives for medical student education-guidelines for medical schools: report I of the Medical School Objectives Project" 74 (74): 13-18, 1999

    7 Maudsley, "Junior medical students′ notion of a ‘good doctor′ and related expectations; a mixed methods study" 41 : 476-486, 2007

    8 Sackett D.L, "Evidence based medicine; what it is and what it isn′t" 312 : 71-72, 1996

    9 Wright, "Attributes of excellent attending physician role models" 339 : 1986-1993, 1998

    10 Wensing M, "A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care" 47 : 1573-1588, 1998

    1 Fones, "“What makes a good doctor?”-views of the medical profession and the public in setting priorities for medical education" 39 : 537-542, 1998

    2 Leahy, "What makes a good doctor? a cross sectional survey of public opinion" 96 : 38-41, 2003

    3 Abu-Hilal, "What makes a good doctor in the 21st century? a qualitative study" 67 : 375-377, 2006

    4 Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, "Skills for the new millennium: report of the societal needs working group CanMEDS 2000 Project" 29 : 206-261, 1996

    5 General Medical Council, "Recommendation on undergraduate medical education" 1993

    6 Association of American Medical College, "Learning objectives for medical student education-guidelines for medical schools: report I of the Medical School Objectives Project" 74 (74): 13-18, 1999

    7 Maudsley, "Junior medical students′ notion of a ‘good doctor′ and related expectations; a mixed methods study" 41 : 476-486, 2007

    8 Sackett D.L, "Evidence based medicine; what it is and what it isn′t" 312 : 71-72, 1996

    9 Wright, "Attributes of excellent attending physician role models" 339 : 1986-1993, 1998

    10 Wensing M, "A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care" 47 : 1573-1588, 1998

    11 Oxman A.D, "A practical guide to informed consent to treatment" 323 : 1464-1466, 2001

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-07-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국의학교육 -> Korean Journal of Medical Education
    외국어명 : korean journal of medical education -> 미등록
    KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.02 1.02 0.76
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.82 0.76 1.204 0.08
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼