Purpose: Our understanding of the characteristics that make a ‘good doctor’ is continually changing. The aim of this study is to identify the attributes deemed important for being a ‘good doctor’ and to examine to what extent doctors actually ...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104018444
2007
-
KCI등재,SCOPUS
학술저널
313-323(11쪽)
24
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Purpose: Our understanding of the characteristics that make a ‘good doctor’ is continually changing. The aim of this study is to identify the attributes deemed important for being a ‘good doctor’ and to examine to what extent doctors actually ...
Purpose: Our understanding of the characteristics that make a ‘good doctor’ is continually changing. The aim of this study is to identify the attributes deemed important for being a ‘good doctor’ and to examine to what extent doctors actually possess them.
Methods: A list of characteristics of a good doctor was generated from literature review and from opinions from medical education experts, a focus group of medical students and a pilot survey of patients. An inventory comprising 33 statements was administered to 598 medical students, 145 faculty, 164 primary care physicians and 85 patients.
Results: All participants regarded ‘accurate diagnosis and treatment’ as the most important attribute for being a ‘good doctor’ and ‘keeping up-to-date’ as the second important attribute. Empathy towards patients, continuing professional development(CPD), kind manners towards patients were also regarded as important. There was a discrepancy between perceived importance and competency in the areas of communication skills, health advocacy and social contribution according to the participating groups.
Conclusion: Excellence in clinical ability was identified as the most important attribute of a ‘good doctor’. Compassion and CPD were also identified as important characteristics. More sophisticated studies are needed to further explore the attributes of a ‘good doctor’ for our society.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 Fones, "“What makes a good doctor?”-views of the medical profession and the public in setting priorities for medical education" 39 : 537-542, 1998
2 Leahy, "What makes a good doctor? a cross sectional survey of public opinion" 96 : 38-41, 2003
3 Abu-Hilal, "What makes a good doctor in the 21st century? a qualitative study" 67 : 375-377, 2006
4 Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, "Skills for the new millennium: report of the societal needs working group CanMEDS 2000 Project" 29 : 206-261, 1996
5 General Medical Council, "Recommendation on undergraduate medical education" 1993
6 Association of American Medical College, "Learning objectives for medical student education-guidelines for medical schools: report I of the Medical School Objectives Project" 74 (74): 13-18, 1999
7 Maudsley, "Junior medical students′ notion of a ‘good doctor′ and related expectations; a mixed methods study" 41 : 476-486, 2007
8 Sackett D.L, "Evidence based medicine; what it is and what it isn′t" 312 : 71-72, 1996
9 Wright, "Attributes of excellent attending physician role models" 339 : 1986-1993, 1998
10 Wensing M, "A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care" 47 : 1573-1588, 1998
1 Fones, "“What makes a good doctor?”-views of the medical profession and the public in setting priorities for medical education" 39 : 537-542, 1998
2 Leahy, "What makes a good doctor? a cross sectional survey of public opinion" 96 : 38-41, 2003
3 Abu-Hilal, "What makes a good doctor in the 21st century? a qualitative study" 67 : 375-377, 2006
4 Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, "Skills for the new millennium: report of the societal needs working group CanMEDS 2000 Project" 29 : 206-261, 1996
5 General Medical Council, "Recommendation on undergraduate medical education" 1993
6 Association of American Medical College, "Learning objectives for medical student education-guidelines for medical schools: report I of the Medical School Objectives Project" 74 (74): 13-18, 1999
7 Maudsley, "Junior medical students′ notion of a ‘good doctor′ and related expectations; a mixed methods study" 41 : 476-486, 2007
8 Sackett D.L, "Evidence based medicine; what it is and what it isn′t" 312 : 71-72, 1996
9 Wright, "Attributes of excellent attending physician role models" 339 : 1986-1993, 1998
10 Wensing M, "A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care" 47 : 1573-1588, 1998
11 Oxman A.D, "A practical guide to informed consent to treatment" 323 : 1464-1466, 2001
건강-보건-의료 관련 전공자를 위한 기초의학 통합강의의 적용
의생명과학 체험프로그램 개발을 위한 생명과학 교과 교육환경 분석
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 평가 | 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지) | |
| 2017-01-01 | 등재 | 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | |
| 2013-07-22 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 한국의학교육 -> Korean Journal of Medical Education외국어명 : korean journal of medical education -> 미등록 | ![]() |
| 2013-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 0.76 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.82 | 0.76 | 1.204 | 0.08 |