의과대학생들의 완벽주의, 성취목적 및 학문적 효능감간의 관계 = Perfectionism, achievement goals, and academic efficacy in medical students

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Perfectionism, Achievement Goals, and Academic Efficacy in Medical Students
Doehee Ahn, PhD, Okboon Kim, MA
Department of Education, College of Education, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea

Purpose: This study explored the interrelationships between perfectionism, achievement goals, and academic efficacy, hypothesizing that perfectionism and achievement goals affected academic efficacy in medical students. Of the 400 medical students surveyed from three universities in Seoul, 228 completed and returned the questionnaires yielding a total response rate of 57%. Their average age was 23.28 years.
Methods: Measures of students' perfectionism, achievement goals, and academic efficacy were obtained. Exploratory factor analyses were used to measure dimensions of perfectionism(adaptive and maladaptive) and achievement goals(mastery, performance-approach, and performance- avoidance). Both scales confirmed the three subscales of achievement goals and two subscales of perfectionism through Principal Component Analyses and internal consistency testing. Structural equation modelling techniques were used to test the relationships among the variables.
Results: It was found that adaptive perfectionism positively influenced students' academic efficacy directly and indirectly via their mastery and performance-approach goals. Moreover, maladaptive perfectionism influenced their academic efficacy indirectly via their performance- approach goals. However, maladaptive perfectionism did not influence their academic efficacy directly or indirectly via performance-avoidance goal.
Conclusion: Medical educators need to be aware that encouraging students toward adaptive perfectionism, which is psychologically less stressful, is valuable given these findings. Perhaps learning environments could be developed to enhance students' adaptive perfectionism, mastery and performance-approach goals, and subsequently academic efficacy.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "환자, 의사, 사회에 대한 교육학적 관점" 49-61, 2000

2 "학습자의 인지양식이 하이퍼텍스트의 탐색과 학습에 미치는 영향" 2004

3 "학습자료 제시양식과 학습자 인지양식이 멀티미디어 학습에서 정보의 통합과 인출에 미치는 영향" 성균관대학교 대학원 2003

4 "학습양식과 글요약의 관계분석" 61-66, 2004

5 "지식유형과 인지양식이 글 요약과 이해에 미치는 영향" 16 (16): 271-285, 2005

6 "일개 의과대학 의학과 학생의 학습양식" 18 (18): 31-39, 2006

7 "인지적 학습양식과 교수학습내용영역의 관계" 40 (40): 203-226, 2002

8 "인지양식 유형과 전공계열 및 학업적응과의 관계" 41 (41): 139-154, 2003

9 "의과 대학생의 심리적 특성과 학업성취도와의 관계" 38 (38): 985-996, 1999

10 "교수ㆍ학습방법의 유형과 의학교육에의 적용" 3 (3): 45-54, 2001

11 "과학영재들은 어떻게 사고하는가?" 23 (23): 21-34, 2003

12 "The Impact of Cognitive Styles and Educational Computer Environments on Learning Performance" Computer Sc Dept Trinity College 18 : 2002

13 "School learning and cognitive style" David Fulton Publishers 2002

14 "Learning and teaching styles in engineering education" 78 (78): 674-681, 2002

15 "Engineering students learning style: a statistical analysis using Felder's index and Learning Styles" Quebec June2002

16 "Do thinking styles contribute to academic achievement beyond self-rated abilities?" 135 (135): 621-637, 2001

17 "Assessment of learning style variables: the NASSP task force model" 24 : 138-144, 1985

18 "Are Cognitive styles still in style?" 52 (52): 700-712, 1997

19 "Applications, Reliability and Validity of the Index of Learning styles" 21 (21): 103-112, 2005

20 "A validation study of the thinking style inventory: Implication for gifted education" 21 (21): 302-307, 1999

21 "A contribution of validation of score meaning for Felder-Solomon's Index of Learning Styles" 2003