사실의 기록과 야담의 진실성 = The recording of fact and the reality of Yadam

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

There was a tradition of writing which based on fact and some real thing. But it changed into fictitious writing in a narratives. Why? This thesis aims to clear the question, and paid attentions to the change of Pilgi and the birth of Yadam.
At first, Pilgi were regarded as supplementary recordings on historical records. So Pilgi recorded only real things fact based on facts and also none doubted the truth of recording. But the circumstance of writing Pilgi started to change, there were false recordings and a writer emphasized that he only wrote facts. But it also meant that there would be fictions on recordings. As fact, there were false stories and it started to increase at the late of 17th century. And the writer insist that he write facts even though it were fictions. Though, outwardly, the writer went after former writers' writing patterns, and practically they changed their writing patterns.
After all, Yadam born at the 18th century. Yadam was a kind of fictional stories. And writers took positive attitude toward fictions and writing to fictions. Concrete facts of Yadam were fiction but the background of Yadam were real. It means that Yadam was born based on recording fact but it changed according to the change of narrative circumstances. So Yadam is a sort of fictional genre based on real things.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

There was a tradition of writing which based on fact and some real thing. But it changed into fictitious writing in a narratives. Why? This thesis aims to clear the question, and paid attentions to the change of Pilgi and the birth of Yadam.
At first, Pilgi were regarded as supplementary recordings on historical records. So Pilgi recorded only real things fact based on facts and also none doubted the truth of recording. But the circumstance of writing Pilgi started to change, there were false recordings and a writer emphasized that he only wrote facts. But it also meant that there would be fictions on recordings. As fact, there were false stories and it started to increase at the late of 17th century. And the writer insist that he write facts even though it were fictions. Though, outwardly, the writer went after former writers' writing patterns, and practically they changed their writing patterns.
After all, Yadam born at the 18th century. Yadam was a kind of fictional stories. And writers took positive attitude toward fictions and writing to fictions. Concrete facts of Yadam were fiction but the background of Yadam were real. It means that Yadam was born based on recording fact but it changed according to the change of narrative circumstances. So Yadam is a sort of fictional genre based on real things.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김준형, "？天倪錄？ 原形再構와 享有樣相 一考" 한국한문학회 37 (37): 459-501, 2006

2 김준형, "한국패설문학연구" 보고사 2004

3 이강옥, "한국야담연구" 돌베개 2007

4 정명기, "한국야담문학연구" 보고사 1996

5 서대석, "조선조 문헌설화 집요Ⅰ" 집문당 1991

6 이강옥, "조선시대 일화 연구" 태학사 1998

7 김진곤, "이야기 小說 NOVEL" 예문서원 2001

8 루샤오펑, "역사에서 허구로" 길 2001

9 정명기, "야담문학연구의 현단계" 보고사 2001

10 이래종, "선초 필기의 전개 양상에 관한 연구" 고려대학교 1997

11 김동욱, "따져가며 읽어보는 우리 옛이야기" 보고사 2004

12 高尙顔, "국역 효빈잡기" 계명대출판부 2007

13 成大中, "국역 청성잡기" 민족문화추진회 2006

14 임완혁, "구연전통과 서사" 태학사 2008

15 월터 J. 옹, "구술문화와 문자문화" 문예출판사 1995

16 辛敦復, "鶴山閑言" 태학사

17 任邁, "雜記古談 in:野談史話集成" 태동

18 徐有英, "錦溪筆談" 국립중앙도서관본

19 李羲平, "過庭錄 in:한산이씨문헌총록" 仝편찬위원회

20 정명기, "紀聞叢話 in: 한국야담자료집성" 계명문화사

21 苗壯, "筆記小說史" 浙江古籍出版社 1998

22 張漢宗, "禦睡新話" 국립중앙도서관본

23 李羲平, "溪西雜錄 (성균관대본, 연민본, 서울대본)"

24 高尙顔, "泰村集" 민창문화사

25 李齊賢, "櫟翁稗說" 국립중앙도서관본

26 李源命, "東野彙輯 in:原本 東野彙輯" 보고사

27 "東稗追錄" 정명기본

28 盧命欽, "東稗洛誦" 연세대본

29 柳夢寅, "於于野談" 천리대본, 만종재본

30 石昌渝, "小說" 人民文學出版社 1994

31 任 埅, "天倪錄" 천리대본

32 민족문화문고간행회, "大東野乘 전18권" 민족문화추진회 1973

33 徐居正, "四佳名著選" 이회 2001

34 司馬遷, "史記英選" 민창문화사 1994

35 鄭載崙, "公私見聞錄" 세종대왕기념사업회 1983

36 이우성, "『이조한문단편집』상ㆍ중ㆍ하" 일조각 1973

37 "CD-ROM 『朝鮮王朝實錄』"