저자들은 과학기술계 정부출연연구구기관의 성과 개념이 지닌 3중의 측정난제(공공 부문의 성과, 과학기술의 성과, 연구기관의 성과의 측정문제)에 대한 인식하에, 과학기술계 정부출연연...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82358951
2009
Korean
KCI등재후보
학술저널
401-430(30쪽)
8
0
상세조회0
다운로드저자들은 과학기술계 정부출연연구구기관의 성과 개념이 지닌 3중의 측정난제(공공 부문의 성과, 과학기술의 성과, 연구기관의 성과의 측정문제)에 대한 인식하에, 과학기술계 정부출연연...
저자들은 과학기술계 정부출연연구구기관의 성과 개념이 지닌 3중의 측정난제(공공 부문의 성과, 과학기술의 성과, 연구기관의 성과의 측정문제)에 대한 인식하에, 과학기술계 정부출연연구기관의 성과를 ‘국가의 존립?발전 및 국민삶의 증진을 위해 정부에 의해 부과된 연구임무의 점진적 달성’으로 개념화한다. 기존의 관련 성과지표들에 대한 비판적 검토를 통해, 과학기술계 정부출연연구기관의 성과는 그 성격, 시계, 범위를 고려하여 설정될 것을 주장한다. 이를 통해 저자들은 과학기술계 정부출연연구기관의 산출, 판단기준 및 성과로서 다음과 같이 제시한다. 산출에는 학술적 논문 및 저서, 기술보고서, 특허, 알고리즘, 프로토타입 및 설계, 정보 및 시설 서비스, 기술지원 및 이전; 판단기준으로는 적합성, 질적 우수성, 리더십; 그리고 성과에는 해당 연구분야 새로운 지식의 창출, 공공재의 공급(정부의 기술수요의 충족), 미래 연구인력의 훈련 및 육성, 경제성장 및 산업발전에 공헌, 과학기술에 대한 국민의 이해 증진 등이 종합적으로 고려되어야 함을 제시한다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Recognizing the tripled measurement difficulties reated to the concept of performance of S&T government research institutes, the authors conceptualize the term performance as the imcremental achivement of research missions which have been imposed in o...
Recognizing the tripled measurement difficulties reated to the concept of performance of S&T government research institutes, the authors conceptualize the term performance as the imcremental achivement of research missions which have been imposed in order to enhance the nation's quality of life and the national development. Upon examining existing performance indicators critically, they maintain that the performance of S&T government research institutes be set to consider its nature, time frame, and scope. An alternative approach to performance measurement is suggested to include 'academic papers and books, technical reports, patents, algorithms, prototypes and designs, information and facility services, technical assistance and technology transfer' as outputs, 'relevance, quality and excellence, and leadership' as the criteria, and 'production of new knowledge in the field, supplying public goods or meeting government's technical needs, training and nurturing future research manpower, contributing to economic growth and industrial development, and enhancing the public understanding of science and technology' as performance.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 최영훈, "혁신이론과 과학기술정책의 최근 주요쟁점에 관한 연구"
2 최영훈, "정부출연연구기관의 기관평가지표체계의 성찰: BSC모형을 중심으로 한 탐색적 시도" 정부학연구소 12 (12): 163-193, 2006
3 이장재, "과학기술계 정부출연 연구기관의 균형적성과평가시스템 구축:균형점수표(BSC) 접근방법을 중심으로" 정부학연구소 9 (9): 3-92, 2003
4 Lane,Jan-Erik, "The Public Sector: Concepts, Models and Approaches" SAGE Publications 2000
5 Pesch,U, "The Predicaments of Publicness: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Ambiguity of Public Administration" Eburon Academic Publishers 2005
6 Allen, Thomas J, "The Organization and Architecture of Innovation: Managing the Flow of Technology" Butterworth-Heinemann and Architectural Press 2007
7 Van Ark,B, "The Measurement of Productivity: What Do the Numbers Mean? in: Fostering Productivity: Patterns, Determinants and Policy Implications"
8 Mark, H, "The Management of Research Institutions: a look at government laboratories"
9 Kostoff, N, "The Handbook of Research Impact Assessment" Office of Naval Research 1996
10 Edquist,C, "Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Chanllenges in:The Oxford Handbook of Innovation" Oxford University Press 181-208, 2005
1 최영훈, "혁신이론과 과학기술정책의 최근 주요쟁점에 관한 연구"
2 최영훈, "정부출연연구기관의 기관평가지표체계의 성찰: BSC모형을 중심으로 한 탐색적 시도" 정부학연구소 12 (12): 163-193, 2006
3 이장재, "과학기술계 정부출연 연구기관의 균형적성과평가시스템 구축:균형점수표(BSC) 접근방법을 중심으로" 정부학연구소 9 (9): 3-92, 2003
4 Lane,Jan-Erik, "The Public Sector: Concepts, Models and Approaches" SAGE Publications 2000
5 Pesch,U, "The Predicaments of Publicness: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Ambiguity of Public Administration" Eburon Academic Publishers 2005
6 Allen, Thomas J, "The Organization and Architecture of Innovation: Managing the Flow of Technology" Butterworth-Heinemann and Architectural Press 2007
7 Van Ark,B, "The Measurement of Productivity: What Do the Numbers Mean? in: Fostering Productivity: Patterns, Determinants and Policy Implications"
8 Mark, H, "The Management of Research Institutions: a look at government laboratories"
9 Kostoff, N, "The Handbook of Research Impact Assessment" Office of Naval Research 1996
10 Edquist,C, "Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Chanllenges in:The Oxford Handbook of Innovation" Oxford University Press 181-208, 2005
11 Goldenfeld, N, "Simple Lessons from Complexity" 2 : 87-89, 1999
12 Van Wart, "Public Sector Values and Productivity in:Public Productivity Handbook" Marcel Dekker, Inc. 2004
13 Nachmias,David, "Public Policy Evaluation: Approaches and Methods" St. Martin's 1979
14 Joly, P. B, "Profile of public laboratories, industrial partnerships and organisation of R & D: the dynamics of industrial relationships in a large research organisation" 25 (25): 901-922, 1996
15 Griliches,Z, "Productivity, R&D" 84 (84): 1-23, 1994
16 Quinn,R.E, "Productivity and the Process of Organizational Improvement: Why We Cannot Talk to Each Other" 38 : 41-45, 1978
17 Ammons,David N, "Productivity Barriers in the Public Sector in:Public Productivity Handbook" Marcel Dekker, Inc. 2004
18 Grünberg,T, "Performance improvement: Towards a methods for finding and priotizing potential performance improvement areas in manufacturing operations" 53 (53): 52-71, 2004
19 Enos,Darryl D, "Performance Improvement: Making It Happen" St. Lucie Press 2000
20 United States Government Accounting Office(GAO), "Performance Budgeting: PART Focuses Attention on Program Performance, but More Can Be Done to Engage Congress"
21 Lovell, C, "Performance Assessment in the Public Sector in:Efficiency in the Public Sector" Kluwer Academic Publishers 11-35, 2002
22 Choi,Y, "Partnering Government Laboratories with Industry" Unpublished Dissertation, Syracuse University 1996
23 Szakoni, R, "Measuring R&D effectiveness I" 37 (37): 27-32, 1994
24 Szakoni, R, "Measuring R&D effectiveness I" 37 (37): 44-55, 1994
25 Heinrich,C.J, "Measuring Public Sector Performance and Effectiveness. in:Handbook of Public Administration" SAGE Publications 2006
26 United States Government Accounting Office(GAO), "Measuring Performance: Strengths and Limitations of Research Indicators"
27 Poister,Theodore H, "Measuring Performance in Public and Nonprofit Organizations" Jossey-Bass 2003
28 Alkadry, Mohamad G, "Measurement as Accountability in:Public Productivity Handbook" Marcel Dekker, Inc. 297-310, 2004
29 Kotler, P, "Marketing in the Public Sector: A Roadmap for Improved Performance" Wharton School Publishing 2007
30 de Bruijn, H, "Managing Performance in the Public Sector" Routledge 2007
31 Lane, H. W, "Managing Large Research and Development Programs" State University of New York Press 1981
32 Mintzberg,H, "Managing Government, Governing Management"
33 Crow, M, "Limited by Design: R&D Laboratories in the U.S. National Innovation System" Columbia University Press 1998
34 Hull,F.M, "Inventions from R&D: organizational designs for efficient research performance" 2 : 393-415, 1988
35 Fox,Kevin J, "Introduction. pp. 1-13. n Kevin J. Fox. Edited. Efficiency in the Public Sector" Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002
36 Baily, Martin N, "Innovation and Productivity Crisis" Brookings Instition 1988
37 Rosen,Ellen Doree, "Improving Public Sector Productivity: Concepts and Practice" SAGE Publications 1993
38 EURAB (European Research Advisory Board), "Final Report: Research and Technology Organizations (RTOs) and ERA"
39 Greenough, William T, "Defining Values for Research and Technology: The University's Changing Role" Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. 2007
40 이민형, "BSC를 적용한 정부출연연구기관의 성과중심관리" 15 (15): 1-20, 2005
41 Pestieau,P, "Assessing the performance of the public sector"
42 Lyall, C, "Assessing end-use relevance of public sector research organizations" 33 : 73-87, 2004
43 Marshall, Kimball P, "An Overview of Potential Government Impacts in:Government Policy and Program Impacts on Technology Development, Transfer and Commercialization: International Perspectives" Best Business Books 3-34, 2005
44 Bozeman,B, "All organizations are public" Jossey-Bass Publishers 1989
45 Quinn, R. E, "A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis" 29 : 363-373, 1983
46 Lindsay,C.M, "A Theory of Government Enterprise" 84 (84): 1061-1077, 1976
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2020-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2017-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2013-01-01 | 등재 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2008-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2005-01-27 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 중앙행정학회 -> 한국공공관리학회영문명 : Chung-Ang Academy Of Public Administration -> Korean Association for Public Management | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 1.03 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 1.11 | 1.13 | 1.252 | 0.08 |