RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    국고보조금이 지방정부의 재정지출에 미치는 영향분석 - 사회복지분야 국고보조금의 fungibility 가설 검증 - = Impact of categorical grants-in-aid on local expenditures- Testing "the fungibility hypothesis" of matching grants for social welfare -

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103989330

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The primary objective of this study is to test "the fungibility hypothesis": if categorical grants are executed as mandated by the grantor, the central government. To this end, this study analyzes the data for 15 years (1995-2009) on the grants-in-aid categorized for social welfare programs. Followings are a brief summary of the analysis.
    Empirical evidence suggests that the hypothesis is generally supported and the extent of fungibility are different from a local government to another. Much of the variances are accounted for by the financial condition of each local government. Financially weak governments are more inclined to divert the grants toward more imminent demands from the points of their own view. On the other hand those metropolitan governments that are in better financial condition have little inducement to reallocate resources against the stipulation attached to the categorical grants.
    Similar patterns are observed when the effect of population size is controlled by using per capita expenditures instead of the gross expenditures. The fungibility hypothesis was again supported in provinces (Do's). However, Seoul and six other metropolitan governments appear to have significantly different resource allocation patterns: they are not actively pursuing fungibility. Even further, a reverse fungibility pattern is observed: more of their own resources are allocated toward social welfare in their efforts to secure more matching grants. Their stronger financial condition, often represented by high self-sustenancy rates, made this possible. One important implication we can draw from this analysis is that the discrepancy of social welfare services between financially strong governments and weak ones are likely to be expanded in the future. Therefore, a carefully designed reform in categorical grant system is required, especially with regard to differentiated matching rates that reflect the financial conditions of grantees.
    To sum up, fungibility is a widespread in local resource allocation in response to matching grants-in-aid; and the extent of fungibility is negatively correlated to the financial condition of each local government. "A reverse fungibility" observed among the metropolitan city governments that are in good financial condition.
    번역하기

    The primary objective of this study is to test "the fungibility hypothesis": if categorical grants are executed as mandated by the grantor, the central government. To this end, this study analyzes the data for 15 years (1995-2009) on the grants-in-aid...

    The primary objective of this study is to test "the fungibility hypothesis": if categorical grants are executed as mandated by the grantor, the central government. To this end, this study analyzes the data for 15 years (1995-2009) on the grants-in-aid categorized for social welfare programs. Followings are a brief summary of the analysis.
    Empirical evidence suggests that the hypothesis is generally supported and the extent of fungibility are different from a local government to another. Much of the variances are accounted for by the financial condition of each local government. Financially weak governments are more inclined to divert the grants toward more imminent demands from the points of their own view. On the other hand those metropolitan governments that are in better financial condition have little inducement to reallocate resources against the stipulation attached to the categorical grants.
    Similar patterns are observed when the effect of population size is controlled by using per capita expenditures instead of the gross expenditures. The fungibility hypothesis was again supported in provinces (Do's). However, Seoul and six other metropolitan governments appear to have significantly different resource allocation patterns: they are not actively pursuing fungibility. Even further, a reverse fungibility pattern is observed: more of their own resources are allocated toward social welfare in their efforts to secure more matching grants. Their stronger financial condition, often represented by high self-sustenancy rates, made this possible. One important implication we can draw from this analysis is that the discrepancy of social welfare services between financially strong governments and weak ones are likely to be expanded in the future. Therefore, a carefully designed reform in categorical grant system is required, especially with regard to differentiated matching rates that reflect the financial conditions of grantees.
    To sum up, fungibility is a widespread in local resource allocation in response to matching grants-in-aid; and the extent of fungibility is negatively correlated to the financial condition of each local government. "A reverse fungibility" observed among the metropolitan city governments that are in good financial condition.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "행정안전부 재정고"

    2 "통계청 국가통계포털"

    3 김렬, "지방재정조정제도의 지출효과 분석: Flypaper Effect를 중심으로" 한국행정학회 37 (37): 241-261, 2003

    4 행정안전부, "지방재정연감: 각 연도별"

    5 유금록, "지방재정교부금의 지출효과: 끈끈이 효과의 검정" 9 (9): 111-136, 2000

    6 국회예산정책처, "지방자치단체 재정난의 원인과 대책: 예산정책보고서 제11호" 2010

    7 이재완, "지방자치단체 사회복지지출 수준의결정요인 분석 : 1995-2005" 한국사회복지정책학회 (31) : 105-124, 2007

    8 김태일, "지방의회 구성과 단체장 선출이 자치단체 사회복지지출 규모에 미친 영향" 35 (35): 69-89, 2001

    9 주만수, "지방소비세(안): 조세인가 혹은 이전재원인가" 자유기업원 2009

    10 최병호, "지방분권특별법과 지방자치단체의 재정격차 완화 방안" 5 : 56-76, 2004

    1 "행정안전부 재정고"

    2 "통계청 국가통계포털"

    3 김렬, "지방재정조정제도의 지출효과 분석: Flypaper Effect를 중심으로" 한국행정학회 37 (37): 241-261, 2003

    4 행정안전부, "지방재정연감: 각 연도별"

    5 유금록, "지방재정교부금의 지출효과: 끈끈이 효과의 검정" 9 (9): 111-136, 2000

    6 국회예산정책처, "지방자치단체 재정난의 원인과 대책: 예산정책보고서 제11호" 2010

    7 이재완, "지방자치단체 사회복지지출 수준의결정요인 분석 : 1995-2005" 한국사회복지정책학회 (31) : 105-124, 2007

    8 김태일, "지방의회 구성과 단체장 선출이 자치단체 사회복지지출 규모에 미친 영향" 35 (35): 69-89, 2001

    9 주만수, "지방소비세(안): 조세인가 혹은 이전재원인가" 자유기업원 2009

    10 최병호, "지방분권특별법과 지방자치단체의 재정격차 완화 방안" 5 : 56-76, 2004

    11 배상석, "지방교부세가 정책유형별 지방정부 지출에 미친 영향분석" 한국정책학회 16 (16): 143-166, 2007

    12 김성태, "중위투표자 모형에 의한 지방재정지출의 결정요인 분석" 1 (1): 121-136, 1999

    13 장덕희, "조건부 지원금이 자치단체의 자체사업비에 미친 영향 분석: Fungibility 가설의 검증을 중심으로" 한국행정학회 44 (44): 291-309, 2010

    14 허명순, "정부간 재정지원금의 변화에 따른 지방정부의 반응" 한국행정학회 37 (37): 189-210, 2003

    15 최원익, "재정분권화와 경제성장의 관계에 관한 실증분석" 한국지방자치학회 20 (20): 89-107, 2008

    16 김미혜, "재정분권 이후 기초지방자치단체의 사회복지예산 변화에 대한 결정요인 연구" 한국사회복지정책학회 36 (36): 189-213, 2009

    17 최병호, "우리나라의 국고보조금 제도에 있어서 Fungibility 가설에 관한 실증적 분석" 13 (13): 171-195, 1999

    18 강성식, "우리나라 광역자치단체의 Fungibility 가설 검증: 시계열 자료를 중심으로" 21 (21): 171-194, 2003

    19 김종순, "사회복지분야 국고보조금이 지방자치단체간 재정불균형에 미치는 영향 분석" 한국지방재정학회 13 (13): 35-62, 2008

    20 문병근, "불완전정보하에서의 지방공공지출: 재정환상모형을 이용한 flypaper effect 검증" 2 : 177-199, 1998

    21 보건복지부, "보건복지부 소관 자치단체에 대한 국고보조금 예산: 각 연도별"

    22 이상용, "국고보조금제도의 개혁방향: 국고보조금제도의 운영현황과 문제점" 112 : 23-36, 2001

    23 박기묵, "국고보조금의 지방비부담방식에 대한 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 연구" 11 (11): 67-87, 2002

    24 이창균, "국고보조금의 보조율과 지방비부담에 관한 연구" 6 (6): 123-148, 2001

    25 Gamkhar, Shama, "The Impact of Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers, In Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: Principles and Practice" The World Bank 2007

    26 Khilji, M. N., "The Fungibility of U.S. Military and Non-Military Assistance and the Impacts on Expenditure of Major Aid Recipients" 43 : 345-362, 1994

    27 Hall, Jeremy. H., "The Changing Federal Grant Structure and Its Potential Effects on State and Local Community Development Efforts" 20 (20): 46-71, 2008

    28 Shah, Anwar, "Shah, Anwar. (1989). A Linear Expenditure System Estimation of Local Response to Provincial Transportation Grants" 2 (2): 150-168, 1989

    29 민인식, "STATA 패널데이터 분석" 한국STATA학회 2009

    30 Zampelli, E. M., "Resource Fungibility, The Flypaper Effect, and the Expenditure Impact of Grants-in Aid" 68 (68): 33-40, 1986

    31 Oates, Wallace E., "On The Evolution of Fiscal Federalism: Theory and Institutions" 61 (61): 313-334, 2008

    32 McGuire, Martin C., "Notes on Grants-in-Aid and Economic Interactions among Governments" 6 (6): 207-221, 1973

    33 최유성, "Intergovernmental Relation (IGR) in Korea and Japan: Phases, Patterns, and Progress Toward Decentralization (Local Autonomy) in a Trans-Pacific Context" 한국행정학회 9 (9): 1-22, 2004

    34 塚原康博, "Fungibility 가설과 Flypaper 효과" 99 (99): 136-150, 1988

    35 Niskanen, William A. Jr., "Bureaucracy and Public Economics (2nd ed.). Brookkfield" Edward Elgar Publishing Company 1994

    36 Gujarati, Damodar N., "Basic Econometrics" Mcgraw-Hill 2003

    37 McGuire, Martin C., "An Econometrics Model of Federal Grants and Local Fiscal Response, In Financing the New Federalism" Johns Hopkins University Press 1975

    38 Shah, Anwar, "A Practitioner's Guide to Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers, In Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: Principles and Practice" The World Bank 2007

    39 McGuire, Martin C., "A Method for Estimating the Effect of a Subsidy on the Receiver's Resource Constraint: With an Application to U.S. Local Governments 1964-1971" 10 : 25-44, 1978

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.89 0.89 0.84
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.84 0.87 1.024 0.24
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼