베르그손 <지속> 이론의 근본적인 변화 = 시간 구성에 있어서 미래의 주도적 역할

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Bergson`s second work, matter and memory, shows a considerable change in his understanding of time`s nature. There, time is no more something indivisible, the distinction of past and present being taken as it`s essential feature. Bergson asserts that the past, by it`s nature, is something that never ceases to be. His assertion of this immortality of the past leads many people to think that, for him, it`s by virtue of the past that duration is possible. Deleuze, an excellent commentator of Bergson`s thinking, constructs a really sophisticated argumentation to explain how this immortal ontological past makes possible the passage of time. But we think that the past, as well as the present, tends only to be spatialized, if it is left alone without the help of the future: the ontological past can not make possible time. We try to show how the future can save past and present from their inherent tendency of spatialization: it is by virtue of the future that time(duration) is possible.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 피터하, "하이데거와 베르그송에 있어서 시간성 문제" 한국하이데거학회 8 (8): 33-45, 2003

2 김재희, "베르그손의 잠재적 무의식: 반복을 넘어서는 창조적 사유역량의 회복" 그린비 2010

3 Heidegger, Martin, "Sein und Zeit. Gesamtausgabe Band 2. Frankfurt am Mein. Hyppolite, Jean. 1971. “Aspects divers de la mémoire chez Bergson.” Figures de la pensée philosophique. PUF"

4 Merleau-Ponty, Mauris, "Phénoménologie de la perception" Gallimard 1945

5 Bergson, Henri, "OEuvres" PUF 1959

6 Bergson, Henri, "Mélanges" PUF 1972

7 Deleuze, Gilles, "Le Bergsonisme" PUF 1966

8 Worms, Frédéric, "Introduction à Matière et Mémoire" PUF 1997

9 Jankélévitch, Vladimir, "Henri Bergson" PUF 1959

10 Bergson, Henri, "Durée et Simultanéité" PUF 1969

11 Marquet, Jean-françois, "Durée bergsonienne et temporalité Bergson, la durée et la nature. Coordinné par Jean Louis Vieillard- Baron. PUF"

12 Poulet, G., "Bergson, le thème de la vision panoramique des mourants et la juxtaposition" NRF 1963